Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 China part of Green Revolution  
1 comment  




2 POV  
4 comments  




3 Political science  
1 comment  




4 Green Revolution: The term "Green Revolution" is applied to the period from and 1967 to 1978. The green revolution started by Dr. Norman Borlaug in Mexico and Dr. M.S. Swaminathan in India. The term green revolution is a general one that is applied to successful agricultural experiments in many countries. But it was most successful in India.  
1 comment  













Talk:Green Revolution




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


China part of Green Revolution

[edit]

China part of the article reads like something taken directly from the Chinese official propaganda textbooks.

And not new ones, considering such peculiarities like the "Agrarian Reform Law of 1950, which ended private land ownership and gave land back to the peasants" - which is self-contradictory.

Also suggesting that Great Leap Forward was beneficial for food security in China, when in reality it caused one of the greatest famines in history, reads like a morbid joke. Or an official Maoist propaganda, take your pick.

This definetly doesn't fit Wikipedia rules about unbiased articles. 176.106.33.167 (talk) 20:43, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

POV

[edit]

The article gives a very pro-Green Revolution view, and little voice is given to the many reliable sources that are more critical of it.

Here is a variety of sources that take a more critical eye to the Green Revolution - they represent a variety of views on it, from "on the whole positive but not without major flaws" to "wholly negative". There are plenty more sources that could be incorporated into the article than these.

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2014/apr/01/norman-borlaug-humanitarian-hero-menace-society

https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9780203840443/green-revolution-revisited-bernhard-glaeser

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11024-019-09372-7

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/green-revolution-norman-borlaug-race-to-fight-global-hunger/

http://kyle.dyson.cornell.edu/aem%204640/Hazell%20green%20rev%20paper.pdf

https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/how-unintended-consequences-unraveled-a-legendary-agricultural-achievement/2020/04/17/b62f0f04-7ff0-11ea-8013-1b6da0e4a2b7_story.html

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/farm-protests-in-india-are-writing-the-green-revolutions-obituary/

https://ourworldindata.org/reducing-fertilizer-use

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jun/27/using-far-less-chemical-fertiliser-still-produces-high-crop-yields-study

https://agricultureandfoodsecurity.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40066-023-00409-5

Furthermore, I don't think "Norman Borlaug's response to criticism" deserves its own section. Eldomtom2 (talk) 17:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, the situation is a bit more complex than that. There is in fact some critical material in the main text (perhaps moved out of the deprecated 'Criticism' section). There is therefore a danger of duplication if materials are added to 'Criticism' or 'Responses' or whatever. We need to remove the section altogether and apply the new sources wherever they fit in the main text. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:09, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is no policy against "reception" or "assessment" sections. With how controversial the Green Revolution is I think such a section would be appropriate, providing it gave adequate weight to both those who think the Green Revolution was a good thing and those who think it was a bad thing.--Eldomtom2 (talk) 17:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There isn't, indeed, but that doesn't licence duplication, nor a definite non-neutral tone throughout the article. The whole thing beads a careful rewrite; the assessment could either be built into each section, or at the end. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Political science

[edit]

Green revolution of India 2409:4065:41A:56DE:0:0:1771:18B0 (talk) 13:09, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Green Revolution: The term "Green Revolution" is applied to the period from and 1967 to 1978. The green revolution started by Dr. Norman Borlaug in Mexico and Dr. M.S. Swaminathan in India. The term green revolution is a general one that is applied to successful agricultural experiments in many countries. But it was most successful in India.

[edit]

The term Green Revolution 2409:408C:2C9C:4237:3DB3:3364:DFD3:47F0 (talk) 05:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Green_Revolution&oldid=1227513727"

Categories: 
B-Class vital articles
Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
Wikipedia vital articles in History
B-Class level-4 vital articles
Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in History
B-Class vital articles in History
B-Class Agriculture articles
High-importance Agriculture articles
WikiProject Agriculture articles
B-Class history of science articles
High-importance history of science articles
WikiProject History of Science articles
B-Class sociology articles
Mid-importance sociology articles
B-Class Food and drink articles
Low-importance Food and drink articles
WikiProject Food and drink articles
B-Class Technology articles
WikiProject Technology articles
B-Class Science Policy articles
Mid-importance Science Policy articles
B-Class Climate change articles
Mid-importance Climate change articles
WikiProject Climate change articles
Hidden category: 
Pages with broken anchors
 



This page was last edited on 6 June 2024, at 05:43 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki