Contents

Talk:Honeywell RQ-16 T-Hawk

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Honeywell RQ-16 T-Hawk article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aircraft project. Military history: Aviation / North America / United States Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force North American military history task force United States military history task force

Thanks for input on naming convention. However, calling RQ-16 "Honeywell RQ-16" implies that the vehicle was all-together developed by Honeywell and takes credit away from a lot of other people/organizations. Until recently, the MAV project was headed by DARPA, now the project is under responsibility of US Army, the RQ-16 designation belongs to US military, which is funding it from taxpayers money, and calling RQ-16 Honeywell’s because they happen to get most of that money and may be replaced as the manufacturer at any time in the future is simply incorrect. But being incorrect is the case of many articles on Wikipedia written by consensus of not very knowledgeable people, and civility or not, if such people insist of stating incorrect things, calling them dickheads is appropriate. As I stated before, due to such people I generally don't contribute to Wikipedia and I won't bother doing it again. --Bxb

Nevertheless, Honeywell is (at present) the current contractor for this system. If and when that changes (or if and when a name is assigned to the system) then we can move the article to that new name.

And there's simply no excuse for incivility. --Rlandmann (talk) 10:58, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is the maximum speed ? -- User:Nroets —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.210.128.156 (talk) 00:26, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted the changes made by an IP which made this inconsistent. (Hohum ^@) 01:35, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's a lot of news coverage right now of Miami-Dade Police adopting this. I'm not sure what qualifies as a suitable reference to include in the article. -- SpareSimian (talk) 06:22, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]