Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Fundamental Contradiction in the Article !  
4 comments  




2 "Coromega" listed at Redirects for discussion  
1 comment  




3 Benefits of EPA only vs EPA+DHA treatment  
3 comments  













Talk:Omega-3 fatty acid




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Fundamental Contradiction in the Article ![edit]

In the introduction, Omega-3 fatty acid is described as playing "an important role in the human diet and in human physiology".

However, in the section "Health Effects", there appears to be negligible evidence for any proven benefits !

Have I missed something ?

Please would someone knowledgeable add an explanation for this ? Many thanks ! Darkman101 (talk) 21:09, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Omega-3 fatty acids are very important for human health and physiology. The "Health effects of omega-3 supplementation" is talking about omega-3 supplements (fish oil) which have not been demonstrated to be beneficial so there is no contradiction. That section is about supplements not omega-3 foods. Psychologist Guy (talk) 21:22, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33888689/ Atchoum (talk) 23:17, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That review was heavily industry funded. Psychologist Guy (talk) 21:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Coromega has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 28 § Coromega until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Benefits of EPA only vs EPA+DHA treatment[edit]

I started noticing recent publications are talking about significant benefit of Omega-3 with EPA only, on various health measures. For example see here

Omega-3 FAs reduced cardiovascular mortality and improved cardiovascular outcomes. The cardiovascular risk reduction was more prominent with EPA monotherapy than with EPA+DHA.

Also see: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002561962030985X

Any thoughts on this? Tal Galili (talk) 18:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with most of these papers is that they are not neutral, they are funded by Omega-3 supplement companies. For example, your second link check the bottom of the paper "Potential Competing Interests" and "Grant Support". The authors of the paper are selling supplements and it was funded by a company selling DHA and EPA supplements. This type of research is really no different than the recent flawed trials we have seen on red meat that were funded by the beef industry. Industry-sponsored studies are nearly always biased in favour of the sponsor's products. Psychologist Guy (talk) 21:18, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a great point!
I've added a new notes section, and will try to add comments about conflict of interests for citated sources from now on.
I don't think a biased paper should be excluded at all times, but I do agree it should be easily available for people to know about it and decide for themselves.
WDYT? Tal Galili (talk) 09:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Omega-3_fatty_acid&oldid=1197400013"

Categories: 
Wikipedia articles that use American English
B-Class vital articles
Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
Wikipedia vital articles in Biology and health sciences
B-Class level-5 vital articles
Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
B-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
B-Class Molecular Biology articles
Unknown-importance Molecular Biology articles
B-Class MCB articles
Top-importance MCB articles
WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology articles
All WikiProject Molecular Biology pages
B-Class medicine articles
High-importance medicine articles
All WikiProject Medicine pages
B-Class pharmacology articles
High-importance pharmacology articles
WikiProject Pharmacology articles
B-Class Skepticism articles
Low-importance Skepticism articles
WikiProject Skepticism articles
B-Class Dietary supplement articles
Mid-importance Dietary supplement articles
Articles with connected contributors
Hidden categories: 
WikiProject Dietary Supplements articles
Pages using connected contributor with unknown parameters
 



This page was last edited on 20 January 2024, at 09:58 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki