Contents

Talk:Psychoeducation

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Social Work Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Social Work, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Social Work on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Social WorkWikipedia:WikiProject Social WorkTemplate:WikiProject Social WorkSocial work articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Psychology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Medicine Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Collaboration on article revision[edit]

This article is an area of interest to me and within my range of experience. I welcome collaboration and plan to share suggested updates here before posting to the page. FYI, my edits are also being reviewed by colleagues and faculty at my university, as this contribution is an element in a Wikipedia project.

I'm looking at the following journal articles: ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]}

Krshein (talk) 02:30, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've now edited the definition and provided additional information to the introduction. Krshein (talk) 09:12, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article covers a fairly central and important topic in clinical psychology, but the second section (beginning "Actually, nothing...") requires revision for appropriate tone, and citations for multiple claims.

This is an area of interest for me and, though not would not claim expertise, I am quite familiar with the subject (I am a student in this discipline). If nobody else chimes in I will see what I can do. :)

Any comment?

Abidagus (talk) 03:56, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am a student of the field in Quebec, Canada, although I am not sure if the profession means the same, in terms of definition, everywhere.

For example (in French) is official documentation concerning the roles of the psychoeducator, although it might be a somewhat-narrowed point of view, and something left to be more exhaustive. http://www.ordrepsed.qc.ca/Psychoeducateur.aspx Twipley (talk) 03:17, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article really needs a rewrite. Firstly, it is a very limited view on the topic - Psycho-education does not only mean education provided to people with a mental health issue, but can be used to describe education given to anyone on various psychosocial topics.

This article makes it sound like a self-contained therapeutic approach, which it is not.

Also, I am deleting the entire 'Controversy' section. It is entirely off-topic, very subjective and even written from the first person. It reads like a copy paste job for sure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.74.165.67 (talk) 05:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I mostly agree with this summation regarding a re-write needed. Have started working on it. In the process of gathering reliable sources and developing some structure.Mrm7171 (talk) 03:15, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Important article though and will be worth the effort. Empirical research has shown this a very effective and evidence based practice.Mrm7171 (talk) 03:17, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First sentence is plagiarized from Oxford English Dictionary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.85.50 (talk) 12:28, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]