Contents

Talk:Umami

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Umami article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 180 days

Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Molecular Biology: MCB This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Food and drink High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

This article was selected as the article for improvement on 14 June 2021 for a period of one week.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 August 2020 and 23 November 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Zjurkowski24. Peer reviewers: MGduffy24, Cconde24.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 11:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2020 and 11 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tyingmyshiu. Peer reviewers: JBonz, Cmbio401.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 11:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Netherzone: Prior to my including 1 citation, there were 8 citations in the article's lead section. "Umami flavorness intensity": nucleotides < glutamates << (glutamates + nucleotides), is a simple fundamental concept. Thanks for not Edit-Warring. ....0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 20:10, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

0mtwb9gd5wx, et al, to my way of thinking the addition of this information is too technical for the article lead, and belongs in the Properties or Background section. Not all encyclopedia readers come to the article because they are interested in the molecular structure of Umami, but come here because they are interested in food, flavor, cuisine, taste and overall sensation. BTW, I'm not an edit warrior, which is why I left you a message about this matter on your talk page. Netherzone (talk) 23:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why the unusual Japanese word just simply the word “savoury” or “savoury” [US]? This Wikipedia English version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.143.179.3 (talk) 03:40, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Atycoon wanted to have sushi for dinner, but a tsunami had hit the coast and the fish markets were gone, so instead he decided to hibachi a burger with a side of ramen. Afterwards he played some sudoku then did some zen meditation, and finally sent a 'sleepy' emoji to his friend before going to bed.

Each of the wikilinked words above is a loan word from Japanese, in common use in english. Umami is a perfectly serviceable word. Is there a problem you perceive with using the word? cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 03:58, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention that “savory” isn’t a good translation; it can apply to flavors that are not umami. Strebe (talk) 19:19, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's interesting the words you chose. "Tycoon" links to "Business Magnate", with tycoon as an alternate loanword from Japanese. Hibachi, Sushi, Sudoku all refer to things that are Japanese creations, without existing English words to use in their place. "Zen" is the Japanese pronunciation of a Chinese word taken from a Sanskrit word. But Umami? Umami isn't any of those. The Wikipedia page repeatedly uses "savoury" as a way to explain Umami. Savoury being the word English-speaking people understand. If you need to explain what Umami is with an English word, there's definitely a larger discussion to be had. Umami and Savoury are not interchangeable, and Umami has a specific scientific background that Savoury lacks. From a Scientific standpoint, Umami is the word that is used, and not even as a loanword. But for general parlance, for a casual discussion about taste - savoury is the word. It's an existing word, it's the sole word used to explain what Umami is, and before the word Umami was decided on, the fifth taste was savoury. People who repeatedly try to paint the tension over shoving the word "Umami" into the language as racist are not having an honest discussion. Maybe there will be a day far in the future where Umami stands on its own without savoury next to it to explain things, but until that happens people are going to bristle at this "Umami is the word there can be no debate" attitude towards a word which needs another word to explain it. Clearly the forced adoption of Umami is not going as well as some people want to pretend. And given how well you illustrated how easily some Japanese loanwords slip into English with no friction and a wide adoption - clearly there's something to the resistance to Umami beyond "you're racist if you don't like this word". Even with a Scientific background, Umami is an ill-defined concept. And while "savoury" can apply to flavours that are not "Umami" - how do you explain that? Shouldn't the Wikipedia article go into depth on that? I'd find that an interesting read. Instead the Wikipedia article uses them interchangeably. This is part of the problem. This is part of the resistance. I do feel there is a large amount of a "smarter than you" attitude when it comes to Umami. You clearly believe you know what Umami is and is not, but you have not used that knowledge to explain things in the article. But you are very happy to insult others and call them racist for not understanding what you very definitively know about a word that Wikipedia uses interchangeably with savoury. Umami is a difficult word. It means something, it's hard to explain, and in the meantime everyone is just going to explain Umami as savoury - but it doesn't mean savoury. But that's the word we're going to use to explain it. But don't think Umami is savoury, it's not, and if you think it is you're racist. Gee what a fun, non-problematic word! Let's compare it to Sudoku while we're at it, I remember the great Sudoku wars where everyone wanted to call them by their traditional English name. You see it yet? If you really want to hasten Umami adoption, maybe find another slant on how to separate Umami and savoury that isn't "the non-racists use Umami". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.14.86.5 (talk) 08:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have a lot of problems with this commentary but the one I’m going to spend a few seconds on is to point out that the word “racist” never appeared in this discussion, nor any sentiment like it, until you (= 100.14.86.5) mysteriously invoked it. Strebe (talk) 18:37, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I have no idea why this has 'triggered' anon-ip so deeply. His/hers is the first "resistance" to the word umami that I've come across. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 21:06, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]