![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The "Negotiations" section of template needs to be considered. Compare the following two templates. Note in the template『India–Pakistan relations』- "Simla Agreement" is listed under "Treaties and Summits". Should others also be included in this template such as Tashkent Declaration and Agra summit.
| |
---|---|
| |
Wars and conflicts |
|
Border skirmishes |
|
Operations |
|
Negotiations |
|
Bombings and massacres |
|
Militant organisations |
|
Observances |
|
Related |
|
DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 19:24, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Abhishek0831996, care to explain why you're POV-pushing and labelling peaceful organizations such as Tehreek-e-Hurriyat as "terrorist jihadist" groups, when TeH hasn't even been classified as such by any government or organization in the world? (Read: WP:OR). Furthermore, while Dukhtaran-e-Millat has been banned by India for separatism, as a peaceful all-women organisation which has never engaged in militancy or been designated as a terrorist group by any other country, does it seriously count as "terrorist jihadist" group in the league of ISIS-K? Then there's the non-jihadi militants like JKLF (again, not even banned by the Indian government[1]). If you insist on lumping all of them under the same label, then "Separatist/Militant" conforms to WP:NPOV. Cipher21 (talk) 18:39, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]