Some toilet roll holders or dispensers allow the toilet paper to hang in front of (over) or behind (under) the roll when it is placed parallel to the wall. This divides opinions about which orientation is better. Arguments range from aesthetics, hospitality, ease of access, and cleanliness, to paper conservation, ease of detaching sheets, and compatibility with pets.
The US advice column Ask Ann Landers reported that the subject was the most controversial issue in the column's history and, at 15,000 letters in 1986, provoked the highest number of responses.[1]
The case study of "toilet paper orientation" has been used as a teaching tool in instructing sociology students in the practice of social constructionism.[2]
Two paper holders, each with different orientation
The main reasons given by people to explain why they hang their toilet paper a given way are ease of grabbing and habit.[3]
The over position reduces the risk of accidentally brushing the wall or cabinet with one's knuckles, potentially transferring grime and germs;[4] makes it easier to visually locate and to grasp the loose end;[5] gives the option to fold over the last sheet to show that the room has been cleaned;[6] and is generally the intended direction of viewing for the manufacturer's branding, so patterned toilet paper looks better this way.[7]
The under position provides a more tidy appearance, in that the loose end can be more hidden from view;[8][9] reduces the risk of a toddler or a house pet such as a cat unrolling the toilet paper when batting at the roll;[10] and in a recreational vehicle may reduce unrolling during driving.[11]
Partisans have claimed that each method makes it easier to tear the toilet paper on a perforated sheet boundary.[12]
The over position is shown in illustrations with the first patents for a free-hanging toilet-roll holders, issued in 1891.[13]
Various toilet paper dispensers are available which avoid the question of over or under orientation; for example, single sheet dispensers, jumbo roll dispensers in which the toilet roll is perpendicular to the wall, and twin roll dispensers.[14] Swivelling toilet paper dispensers have been developed which allow the paper to be unrolled in either direction.[15][16]
In various surveys, around 70% of people prefer the over position.[a] In a survey of 1,000 Americans, Cottonelle found that "overs" are more likely than "unders" to notice a roll's direction (~75 percent), to be annoyed when the direction is "incorrect" (~25 percent), and to have flipped the direction at a friend's home (~30 percent).[citation needed] The same claim is made by James Buckley's The Bathroom Companion for people older than 50.[24] Toilet paper orientation is sometimes mentioned as a hurdle for married couples.[25] The issue may also arise in businesses and public places.[26] At the Amundsen–Scott Research Station at the South Pole, complaints have been raised over which way to install toilet paper.[27] It is unclear if one orientation is more economical than the other. The Orange County Register attributes a claim to Planet Green that over saves on paper usage.[28]
The case study of "toilet paper orientation" is an important teaching tool in instructing sociology students in the practice of social constructionism.[29][2]
In the article "Bathroom Politics: Introducing Students to Sociological Thinking from the Bottom Up",[2]Eastern Institute of Technology sociology professor Edgar Alan Burns describes some reasons toilet paper politics is worthy of examination. On the first day of Burns' introductory course in sociology, he asks his students, "Which way do you think a roll of toilet paper should hang?"[30] In the following fifty minutes, the students examine why they picked their answers, exploring the social construction of "rules and practices which they have never consciously thought about before".[31] Burns' activity has been adopted by a social psychology course at the University of Notre Dame, where it is used to illustrate the principles of Berger and Luckmann's 1966 classic The Social Construction of Reality.[29]
Christopher Peterson, a professor of psychology at the University of Michigan, classifies the choice of toilet paper orientation under "tastes, preferences, and interests" as opposed to either values or "attitudes, traits, norms, and needs". Other personal interests include one's favorite cola or baseball team. Interests are an important part of identity; one expects and prefers that different people have different interests, which serves one's "sense of uniqueness".
Differences in interests usually lead at most to teasing and gentle chiding. For most people, interests do not cause the serious divisions caused by conflicts of values; a possible exception is what Peterson calls "the 'get a life' folks among us" who elevate interests into moral issues.[32]
Morton Ann Gernsbacher, a professor of psychology at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, compares the orientation of toilet paper to the orientation of cutlery in a dishwasher, the choice of which drawer in a chest of drawers to place one's socks, and the order of shampooing one's hair and lathering one's body in the shower. In each choice, there is a prototypical solution chosen by the majority, and it is tempting to offer simplistic explanations of how the minority must be different. She warns that neuroimaging experiments—which as of 2007 were beginning to probe behaviors from mental rotation and facial expressions to grocery shopping and tickling—must strive to avoid such cultural bias and stereotypes.[33]
In his book Conversational Capital, Bertrand Cesvet gives toilet paper placement as an example of ritualized behavior—one of the ways designers and marketers can create a memorable experience around a product that leads to word-of-mouth momentum. Cesvet's other examples include shaking a box of Tic Tacs and dissecting Oreo cookies.[34]
^Ode 2010: "The Kimberly-Clark company cites three advantages for rolling over: perforation control, viewing advantage and wall avoidance."; Garton 2005; Jarski & Jarski 2007.
^Lind 1992; "The Grand Princess cruise ship replaces its toilet paper with the leading edge over the front, so that it can be folded as is done in five-star hotels. (Yes, someone really did ask this question.)" (Carpenter 1999); Rosencrans 1998; Garton 2005.
Burns, Edgar Alan (January 2003). "Bathroom Politics: Introducing Students to Sociological Thinking from the Bottom Up". Teaching Sociology. 31 (1): 110–118. doi:10.2307/3211429. JSTOR3211429.
Carpenter, Richard P. (28 March 1999). "It's swimming vs. snoozing". The Boston Globe. p. M4. Factiva bstngb0020010825dv3s00asy.
Cesvet, Bertrand; Babinski, Tony; Alper, Eric (2008). Conversational Capital: How to Create Stuff People Love to Talk About. Pearson Education. ISBN978-0-13-714550-8.
"At long last, I can escape from my Polar prison", Daily Express, pp. 38–39, 14 October 1999, Factiva theexp0020010826dvae0066w
Darbo, Paul (April 2007). This Way In: The Sound and the Fury: ELSEWHERE IN THE BIN (letters to the editor). Vol. 147. p. 22. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
Ebenkamp, Becky (19 January 2004), "Out of the Box", Brandweek, Factiva ADMW000020040202e01j0002m
Elliott, Carson (11 June 2006). "The proper thing: Position plates so that meat is closest to diner, unless dishes display pictures". Augusta Chronicle. p. G02. Factiva AGCR000020060809e26b00004.
Floyd, Jacquielynn (29 June 1999). "Inventor rolls out solution to toilet paper war". The Dallas Morning News. p. 15A. Factiva dal0000020010829dv6t005qf.
Garton, Nicole (8 January 2005). "Over or under? The great toilet paper debate continues". Tulsa World. p. D10. Factiva TUL0000020050111e1180000y.
Grant, Michael (16 July 1991). "Paper chase unravels at 30,000 feet". The San Diego Union-Tribune. p. C-1. Factiva SDU0000020070627dn7g002uk.
Grant, Michael (1 September 1991). "Toilet paper theorist is on a roll, but issue is still under scrutiny". The San Diego Union-Tribune. p. D-1. Factiva SDU0000020070627dn91007fo.
Henry, Bonnie (1 August 1999). "The key role of toilet paper has columnist's eyes rolling". The Arizona Daily Star. p. 3E. Factiva tucs000020010830dv81006wg.
Jarski, Rosemarie; Jarski, Milena (2007). How to Do Everything!. Globe Pequot. p. 143. ISBN978-1-84537-415-0.
Hogan, Eve Eschner; Hogan, Steve (2000). Intellectual Foreplay: Questions for Lovers and Lovers-To-Be. Hunter House.
Rosencrans, Joyce (7 November 1998), "To fold or not to fold/ guest-bathroom tissue", The Cincinnati Post, p. 1C, Factiva cinp000020010916dub700mw1
Rubin, Neal (28 September 1989), "From socks to toilet paper roll, answers unfold in U.S. survey", Toronto Star, p. LIFE L2, Factiva TOR0000020080325dl9s019zs
Davis, Rich (14 February 2006). "'House Rules' Aims at Harmony". The Evansville Courier. p. D5. Factiva EVVL000020060216e22e0004u.
Dickson, Gunna (3 July 2001). "New Products – Clean All Over". Reuters. Factiva lba0000020010912dx730069x.
Downey, Maureen; Harrison, Bette (27 June 1993). "Peach buzz talk of our town". Atlanta Journal and Constitution. p. D/2. Factiva atjc000020011031dp6r00w44.
Harden, Hike (30 July 1995). "Like these ideas? OK, then start your own column". The Columbus Dispatch. p. 01I. Factiva clmb000020011024dr7u00d2h.
Keim, David (7 April 1997). "Science fair has 301 entries from 40 schools". The Knoxville News-Sentinel. p. A4. Factiva kxvl000020011007dt47006av.
Ladan, Mark (20 March 2001). "New exhibit from Guelph lifts the lid on toilet history". Toronto Star. p. A04. Factiva tor0000020010713dx6k00ldj.
Landers, Ann (7 January 1998). "'Illegitimate daughter' harassing you could be a dangerous weirdo". St. Louis Post-Dispatch. p. E2. Factiva SLMO000020040607du17004nd.
Landers, Ann (27 July 2002). Mary K. Nolan (ed.). "It's been an interesting 47 years". The Hamilton Spectator. p. A01. Factiva hmsp000020030501dy7r000xe.
"Interview: Ann Landers; Ann Landers discusses her life, her column and her new book, 'Wake Up and Smell the Coffee!'", The Oprah Winfrey Show, 6 June 1996, Factiva OPRH000020070817ds66000bj
"Hang toilet paper over top of roll, Ann Landers says". Toronto Star. 19 November 1986. p. A4. Factiva TOR0000020080607dibj01g0q.
"TTA/Talk Radio", Voice of America Press Releases and Documents, 2 March 2004, Factiva VOA0000020040303e0320001j
Marelius, John (18 February 1987). "Ann Landers' world has changed in 31 years". The San Diego Union-Tribune. p. D-3. Factiva SDU0000020070707dj2i00mgk.
McCarthey, Tom (3 March 1996). "Unraveling Toilet Trivia". The Salt Lake Tribune. p. Travel H1. Factiva sltr000020011015ds33006we.
Mitchell, Kathy; Sugar, Marcy (13 September 2005). "Annie's Mailbox: Ask phone company to block prank calls". The Gazette (Montreal). p. E8. Factiva MTLG000020050915e19d0000c.
Nestruck, J. Kelly (1 February 2005). "In loo of usual exhibits". National Post. p. AL5. Factiva FINP000020050201e1210002l.
Stark, Judy (27 June 1993). "They must be flushed". St. Petersburg Times. p. AT HOME, 1. Factiva stpt000020011101dp6r00yb8.
Toronto Star staff and news services (15 June 1993). "Over beats under in toilet paper poll". Toronto Star. p. LIFE, B1. Factiva TOR0000020080312dp6f00bo2.
