Hello, I'm Kansas Bear. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. The removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Defensor Ursa17:37, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Xiongnu, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop changing articles so that they read 'Turkish' instead of something else. This edit changed sourced text. Others have just deleted text with no justification given in edit summaries. Editors who do this persistently usually end up blocked.Dougweller (talk) 16:18, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:01, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Because of your unencyclopedic behaviour and your obvious ethnocentric and unscientific agenda, you have been reported to admins. You can comment on it here. --Lysozym (talk) 10:25, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Project Turkey sayfasında Turkish speaking user need iletisinden anladığım kadarıyla, Administrator sayfasında EMr KnG paragrafında şikayet edilmiş bulunuyorsunuz. Konunun öncesini bilmiyorum ama galiba Ani maddesiyle ilgili. İsterseniz yardımcı olabilirim. İyi çalışmalar. (This message in Turkish language is a help offer) Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 19:18, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merhaba. Kaynaklarinizi ben de kontrol ettim, bu web siteler bilimsel kaynaklar degildir. Kaynak göstermeyen websitelerdir, profesyonel tarihcilerin yaptigi siteler degildir. Lütfen ciddi kaynaklar gösterin. Ayrica da heryere kisilerin Türk isimlerini yazmak cok tuhaf geliyor. Anylayisiniz icin tesekkürler. 小龙 (Timish)# xiǎolóng de xìnxiāng10:07, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bilimsel değil diyorsunuz, ama pek de dikkatli bakmamışsınız o zaman, veya gözünüzden kaçmış. Kaynak olarak sadece site sunmadım, oradaki asıl kaynak kitaptır, siteleri de ek olarak sundum. Her yere kişilerin Türkçe isimlerini yazmak niye tuhaf gelsin ki? O Türkçe isimlerini yazdığım kişiler Babür padişahıdır. Babür padişahları Türktür. Ama niyeyse bu adamlar Türk olduğu halde Urduca'sı, hatta Farsça'sı bile yazıyor da Türkçe'si yazmıyor. Asıl tuhaf olan budur işte. EMr KnG (talk) 11:07, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Even if it is true that those historical personalities and states were Turkish (or "Turkic"), in some sense, it still makes no sense to add those names in the way you did. Those are names in modern Turkish. They have little or nothing to do with what those persons would themselves have spoken or written, and even less with what English Wikipedia readers are likely to come across in the literature. You need to get this misunderstanding out of your head that foreign names in lead sentences are included as some kind of symbolic acknowledgment of a person's ethnic identity. That is not what we have them for. Fut.Perf.☼08:58, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sizi anlıyorum . Geçmişte ben de tamamen Türkiye'te ait RumiveTenedos gibi maddelerin başlıklarını değiştirmeğe kalkmış ve başarısızlığa uğramıştım. Madem İngilizce WP de yazıyoruz, kurallara da uymalıyız. Mümkün olduğu kadar güvenilir İngilizce kaynaklar kullanın. Sıkışırsanız Türkçe kaynak ta olabilir. Ama sıradan internet sayfası değil, Zeki Velidi Togan ya da Halil İnalcık gibi uluslararası üne sahip isimlerin kitaplarını kullanın. Ayrıca fazla revert (geri alma) yapmayın; şikayet edilebilirsiniz. İyi çalışmalar. (This message in Turkish language is about my suggestion to EMr KnG)Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 08:28, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Şayet İngilizce kaynak bulamadıysanız, Türkçe yazılı kaynak kullanabilirsiniz. Bu durumda yazarın akademisyen olmasında yarar var. (Şayet yazar adına Wikipedia'da madde varsa iyi olur.) Referanslarda kitapların International Standard Book Number (ISBN) numarasını yazın. On line kaynaklarınızın .edu uzantılı olanları biraz daha güvenilir sayılır. Ayrıca kaynakların pdf formatlı olanlarını tercih edin. Selamlar (This message in Turkish language is about reference suggestions.) Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 19:22, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Kansas Bear. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. The removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Defensor Ursa 17:37, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Xiongnu, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop changing articles so that they read 'Turkish' instead of something else. This edit changed sourced text. Others have just deleted text with no justification given in edit summaries. Editors who do this persistently usually end up blocked. Dougweller (talk) 16:18, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:01, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
