Contents

User talk:Eleutherius

{{helpme}} Hello random editor. I have tried to find a place on wp to put forward an idea of mine but cant locate such a place. My idea is that someone would create a tool or a html or something that would automatically put any reference in an article to a year e.g 1567 to that years page. Most years pages are sparse even though that year might be mentioned many articles. I realise that you couldnt just send the sentence containing the year to the years page as the sentence mightnt provide enough context to make sense on the years page. But maybe we could do like we do with cat tags and have a year tag or something that would send the paragraph to the years page which would force some editing to be done on the years page but it would at least make the year pages much much better. Just a thought.I realise that the whole area of cat tags is compliacted but maybe theres something we could do.

Hi. Please take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/1567 and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&redirs=0&search=1567&fulltext=Search&ns0=1&title=Special:Search&advanced=1&fulltext=Advanced+search - perhaps those will help? If not, please place a {{helpme}} again. Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ 15:51, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

www.fira-aer-rugby.com 76.173.85.6 (talk) 15:59, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Like it says. i got a guy who keeps vandailising things. His talk page is full of requests to stop vandalising but so far noone has done it. How do i make it happen?Eleutherius (talk) 12:26, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eleutherius, in case there is an ongoing vandalism by a user or IP address that has already been warned multiple times, it should be notified at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism to get the attention by admins. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 12:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Real Sinn Féin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Sinn Féin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Quasihuman | Talk 14:04, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding categorisation of this article — please see WP:SUBCAT. When category A is a subcategory of category B, pages that belong in A shouldn't also be put in B, because this produces clutter. A simpler explanation, equally applicable, can be found in the Commons discussion of overcategorisation. Nyttend (talk) 20:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC) thanksEleutherius (talk) 07:58, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Deadmaus#Requested_move_3_.28to_.22Joel_Zimmerman.22.29. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 16:23, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edittoDonoughmore may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Road|Regional roads]] in Donoughmore, the [[R619 road (Ireland)|R619]] and the [[R579 road (Ireland|R579]]. During the 18th century and 19th century [[History of roads in Ireland|specialist

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:53, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I just wanted to stop by and commend you for your fine work on Green Party of the United States-related articles, including the starting of Nader's 1996 campaign and Cobb's 2004 campaign. I too have been doing some editing on this topic lately and I appreciate your interest. Please let me know if I can be of any assistance in other articles of this sort. Thank you and happy editing!--TM 11:12, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• hey no problem. its my pleasure really. Eleutherius (talk) 12:12, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• actually what would be good is a ballot access table for the greens going back to nader's 96 run. or though... I could do that myself. Race ya! Eleutherius (talk) 18:30, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:David Cobb Presidential logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:42, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About your correct removal of Islamic honorifics, the guideline is at WP:PBUH. Thanks for the edit. Editor2020, Talk 23:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• thanks for letting me know. Eleutherius (talk) 09:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! As you tagged yourself as being in Ireland, I hope you don't mind me reaching out. We know have a recognised Wikimedia Community Ireland User Group and we have been running workshops and other events in Dublin and beyond. In case you are interested our next event will be this Saturday in Collins Barracks, you can find the details here. Smirkybec (talk) 22:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Donoughmore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Collins. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:United States Pacifist Party has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:09, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You created the 2016 Cavan Senior Hurling Championship article in May 2017. It remained largely an empty template for some time, prompting an editor to tag it as "needing immediate attention" by someone from WikiProject Ireland. I spotted it in the "needing attention" pile recently. And have attempted to improve it. But am kinda struggling. Given the lack of available refs to support it. In particular I am struggling with the outcome of the competition. In this edit you noted that, despite losing in the final, Cootehill were awarded the title. I don't doubt that this was/is the case. And I appreciate that this was a while ago. But do you know what you based this text upon? I can find no sources which support this particular text. Which, in turn, is making me question why we have this article. IE: If nobody in the "real world" (outside Wikipedia) feels that the winner of this competition is worthy of recording, then why do we? (Wikipedia shouldn't be the only place that something "exists". Its probably the lowest bar we have for WP:GNG.) Anyway, if you have a source for that claim, that'd be great. Not least so we can remove the "needs attention" tag. Cheers. Guliolopez (talk) 10:22, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Deborah de Luca, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 08:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deborah de Luca and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hello, Eleutherius! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:52, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deborah de Luca and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

An article you recently created, Nome–Taylor Highway, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:04, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deborah de Luca and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Simbu warriors Rugby league team.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of TNA Simbu Lions.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eleutherius. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nome–Taylor Highway, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eleutherius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nome–Taylor Highway".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:50, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eleutherius. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Deborah de Luca, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Socialist Workers Party (United States) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:10, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Warwickshire GAA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

zero references no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Theroadislong (talk) 17:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 2023 Rugby League Ireland season. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 15:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cambalachero was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 Rugby League Ireland season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hello Eleutherius! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:Peter Sonski 2024 Presidential Campaign, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from <https://www.petersonski.com/vision>, <https://www.petersonski.com/Lauren-Onak>, <https://independentpoliticalreport.com/2023/06/peter-sonski-chosen-as-american-solidarity-presidential-nominee-on-first-ballot/>, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Draft talk:Peter Sonski 2024 Presidential Campaign and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Draft:Peter Sonski 2024 Presidential Campaign, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:Peter Sonski 2024 Presidential Campaign. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:Peter Sonski 2024 Presidential Campaign with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:Peter Sonski 2024 Presidential Campaign saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eleutherius! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Peter Sonski 2024 Presidential Campaign, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from <https://www.petersonski.com/vision>, <https://www.petersonski.com/Lauren-Onak>, <https://independentpoliticalreport.com/2023/06/peter-sonski-chosen-as-american-solidarity-presidential-nominee-on-first-ballot/>, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Peter Sonski 2024 Presidential Campaign and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Peter Sonski 2024 Presidential Campaign, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Peter Sonski 2024 Presidential Campaign. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Peter Sonski 2024 Presidential Campaign with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Peter Sonski 2024 Presidential Campaign saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks to everybody for the feedback.

I will work on it.

In the mean time can the sections not touched upon be unblocked.

they were the campaign, ballot access, background ? Eleutherius (talk) 14:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

​Hi Eleutherius. I'm pretty sure you can trying rewriting the content of those particular sections in your own words in your user sandbox or offline if you want. If you use your user sandbox, though, don't copy-and-paste the questionable content into it and then click "Publish changes" because that will only create another potential copyright version of a page that needs to be cleaned. If copyright violating content is found, it will be cleaned out and older revisions of the article may even need to be revision deleted. If that happens, the last thing you want to do is try to re-add it (even to another page like your user sandbox) because it just means more cleanup. If you do that too many times, an administrator might decide that stronger action is needed to stop you for continuing to do so.

In addition, to copyright related issues, content taken directly from a political candidates website (even content released under an acceptable free license) is almost always written in a style or tone than is not WP:NPOV. The candidate is, after all, trying to attract supporters and may use all kinds of WP:WTW and other stylistic techniques to make themselves more appealing; they might also be making claims about themselves or others that are more WP:OR than not. So, it would be better to look for reliable secondary sources covering the campaign, and base the article's content on that. You can MOS:QUOTE reliable sources or the candidate themselves if needed, but you will need to be careful of WP:PLAGIARISM and WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE.

You should also understand that the Wikipedia article will still need to meet WP:N regardless so you should look for significant coverage in secondary reliable sources that clearly establishes that. You should also understand that the article is not a platform for the candidate to promote themselves, and that neither they nor their campaign have a claim of WP:OWNERSHIP over the article. In fact, anyone associated with the campaign (even a volunteer) almost certainly is going to be considered to have a WP:COI and possibly a WP:PAID connection, which means they really shouldn't directly be editing the article at all. For an example on what happens when a politician or their staff try to use Wikipedia in an inappropriate way, take a look at United States congressional staff edits to Wikipedia and Wikipedia:Congressional staffer edits. Wikipedia is in the WP:REALWORLD and an article about someone running for president is almost certainly going to end up monitored to make sure it's in compliance with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines, in particular WP:BLP and WP:NOT. Please understand I'm not trying to imply you've already done or are going to do any anything inapproriate, but articles about political campaigns (particulary for major elections) do tend to attract lots of attention from both inside and outside of Wikipedia. They can also be targets for WP:VANDALISM and other inappropriate stuff. Furtrhermore,Wikipedia isn't really the news and isn't required to be updated to the minute. So, the best approach is to stick to WP:COPO and let the article develop naturally along those lines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Peter Sonski 2024 Presidential Campaign. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying you on behalf of Marchjuly, who had opened up the above thread but neglected to inform you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for not notifying you about this. Given that you've already moved the contents of the draft to the mainspace, there's probably no need for the draft anymore regardless of what happens with respect to the article. So, instead of just waiting for it to be deleted per WP:G13, you might want to nominate it for speedy deletion yourself per WP:G7. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]