 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
I did indeed cite two reliable sources which both attributed the attack to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), please tell me how this can not be considered a terrorist attacks?
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Superman. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Schism or rebranding? See my comments on the talk page. I don't know. Doug Weller talk 10:30, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Al Jazeera America. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 16, February-March 2016
byThe Interior (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs)
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Maria Sharapova. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2016 Stanley Cup Finals. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Time (Electric Light Orchestra album). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
( sorry for my English )
I'm Hakka myself. Fistable I do not understand why in half of the wiki page you must label " Hakka『 everywhere when it's already mentioned in the Categories section. Hakka is just a linguistic group and we are Chinese but yet it mentions us like we are some seperate ethnicity or ethnic minority of Chinese. There are thousands of notable Chinese that are not Hakka like Teochew, Cantonese, Hokkien, Shanghainese, shangdonese, Beijinger, Taishanese, Sichuanese but you don't see them labeling themselves in every wiki page.
You say 』 Not reliably sourced ", that's the problem when you don't you use your eyes and check. Like 80% of the Hakka pages you reverted are not sourced either, and I've saw a few of those sources being wrongly mininsterpreted.
Many are only 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 Hakka and may not consider themselves Hakka even the pure Chinese ones. Example: Tessanne Chin, Tami Chynn, Aron Winter are 75% (3/4 ) racially non-Asian and non-Hakka. Michael Lee-Chin and his parents consider themselves Black. Some of the pure Chinese in this list have mentioned being Hakka but in reality only claim to have Hakka ancestor and may or may not considers themselves Hakka. Let me just includes others like Varina Tjon-A-Ten, Myra Sidharta are only also 25% Hakka Chinese. Byron Lee, Mark Chung, Patsy Yuen are all 50%+ Black ect. Others like Kimiko Yo is 50% Chinese and are 50% white, 50% Thai, 50% Cantonese or other Chinese groups. Others Hakka listed are mixed Chinese of 1/4 Hakka and 3/4 Cantonese and other Han sub-groups ect. We don't even know if they consider themselves Hakka or not.
For us Hakka (aswell for Chinese). We ussually don't consider Hakka who mixed with white, black, latino as Hakka one of us let alone those who have only a meager of 1/4 / 25%. So it is not correct to claim predominantly non-Hakka people as Hakka people ( Han Chinese ). 223.27.194.66 (talk) 7:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
