 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
Firstable I talked with you and you did not bother to reply and instead just said not properly sourced. What do you mean by not realiably sourced when most column descriptions of the List of Hakka people are not sourced either !!!! Why don't you remove most of the list aswell???
Furthermore I've given you evidence on a significant number Of people who only has little Hakka ancestry which is significant evidence and I'm not even including those who are mixed with Cantonese, Teochew, Hokkien, Shanghaninese, Beijinger
( And this is not including the list of of Hakka people who mixed with other Han Chinese subgroups (like Cantonese, Teochew, Hokkien, Shanghainese, Beijinger ) in different proportions. )
Do you have any source that shows all these mixed breeds identify themselves as Hakka Chinese ?????????? If you cannot prove it why do you want removed unbiased statement ??? or do you just want to cherry picking to your suiting ? 223.27.194.66 (talk) 9:23, 17 May 2016
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Center for Security Policy. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Please read what Johnson103 and I had to say, he is the person who contributed more than 50%+ of the list of Hakka people. Even he admits that many of the Hakka Chinese in his list are in fact only 1/4, 1/8 , 1/16 or people who claim to have Hakka ancestors. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Johnson103
Aside from the mixed Hakka + non-Asian Hakka, many of the people in this are in fact Hakka mixed with other Chinese dialect group in different proportions. Even many of these people listed as Hakka are disputed, in the Chinese references that claim they have some Hakka Chinese ancestry but does not neccesarily say they claim to be one. And if you look at the Chinese wiki and Baidu , many of the people in the list are clearly not included. -223.27.194.66 (talk) 6:38, 29 May 2016
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Comics. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 17, April-May 2016
byThe Interior, Ocaasi, UY Scuti, Sadads, and Nikkimaria
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Captain Marvel (DC Comics). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (music). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeremy Searle. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
