The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (February 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
|
Code Pink: Women for Peace is a feminist anti-war group that started in the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq. They describe themselves as a "grassroots peace and social justice movement working to end the war in Iraq, stop new wars, and redirect our resources into healthcare, education and other life-affirming activities."[1] Wearing their signature pink color,[2] they have conducted marches, protests, and high-visibility publicity stunts in order to achieve their goals, earning criticism from President Bush and others.
The name "Code Pink" itself is a play on the United States Department of Homeland Security's color-coded alert system:
We began in the onset to war in Iraq in 2002, as President Bush was telling us all to be afraid: CODE ORANGE! Duct tape your windows shut! CODE YELLOW! Saran-wrap everything in your freezer! [3]
In keeping with the name, participants at Code Pink events normally wear pink. While the group is initiated and led by women, men are welcome to participate at both the local and national level.
Code Pink began on October 2, 2002, on Mahatma Gandhi's birthday, and in November they launched a 4-month vigil in front of the White House that culminated on March 8, International Women's Day, with a 10,000-person march.
In February 2003, just weeks before the invasion of Iraq, Code Pink organized its first trip to Iraq, and then led 5 delegations there. These included a trip with parents who lost their children in Iraq, and a trip with parents of soldiers. They also brought a group of 6 Iraqi women to the U.S. to tour the country, and published a report about how the US occupation has affected the status of Iraqi women. [4] Code Pink also put out a book called "Stop the Next War Now", [5] which included essays by Eve Ensler, Barbara Lee, Arianna Huffington, Janeane Garafalo, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Hong Kingston, Jody Williams, Naomi Klein, Benazir Bhutto, Helen Thomas, Julia Butterfly Hill, Amy Goodman, Doris Haddock, Cynthia McKinney and others.
Every year on Mothers Day, Code Pink organizes peace rallies. On Mother's Day 2006, Code Pink organized a 24-hour gathering in Lafayette Park, across the street from the White House, which was attended and supported by activists such as Cindy Sheehan, Susan Sarandon and Patch Adams.[15] Code Pink has also organized vigils at Walter Reed Army Medical CenterinWashington D.C.. These vigils have been met with criticism in the media.[16]
On their official website, Code Pink has listed allegations of U.S. war-crimes, and claimed thousands of civilians were killed in Fallujah in 2004 due to the actions of the U.S. military.[17] Along with other groups, they gave over $20,000 worth of supplies to the residents of Fallujah in 2004.
Code Pink encourages counter-recruitment in opposition to U.S. military recruitment in schools and at recruitment centers.[18]
The organisation is planning protests labelled kiss-ins for St Valentine's Day, 2008. Members are encouraged to assemble outside military recruitment centres and kiss; as well as holding up banners with slogans such as "Make out, not war!" and "Love the troops, Hate the War".[19] Members are also asked to hand out flyers alleging that military recruiters are lying to those they are recruiting. According to the Code Pink website, "For example, the flyers claim that recruiters tell potential recruits their chance of being sent to a combat zone is slim. In contrast, according to the flyers, almost all recruits will be sent to Iraq or Afghanistan." [20]
In late 2007, CodePink began protesting a U.S. Marines recruiting center in Berkeley, California. The Berkeley City Council was widely criticized after that for voting to tell the Marines that they were unwelcome. Berkeley resident and CodePink protester Cynthia Papermaster said "We're not against the Marines, but against what they're recruited to do." Counter-protestors held signs, including one that said "stop bashing our boys."[21]
Code Pink, or individual Code Pink leaders, have been criticized in two major areas. First vigils at military hospitals have been described as not respecting the wounded soldiers.[16] The second is that they have supported Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez, who has been the subject of accusations in the U.S. media of human rights violations and lack of democratic process.[22] The organisation has responded to these accusations by stating that their vigils have been disrupted by individuals who are not part of the group and that the accusations aimed at President Chavez are false.[23][22]
Code Pink has been the subject of criticism for actions at demonstrations at the Walter Reed Medical Center in Washington, DC. Code Pink describes the demonstrations as "vigils not protests" and says their purpose is to highlight the lack of care for veterans. Their press release said "Since we started these vigils, we feel we have helped put the spotlight on the needs of the soldiers and helped achieve positive results, such as greater VA funding and a rollback of attempts to make soldiers pay for their own meals, phone calls, daily hospitalization fees and increased co-payments."[24] Criticism has centered on the use of tactics such as displaying coffins and chanting aggressive slogans. Speaking of the displaying of coffins, Kevin Pannell, an amputee and former patient at the hospital said it "was probably the most distasteful thing I had ever seen. Ever. We went by there one day and I drove by and [the anti-war protesters] had a bunch of flag-draped coffins laid out on the sidewalk. You know that 95 percent of the guys in the hospital bed lost guys whenever they got hurt and survivors' guilt is the worst thing you can deal with."[16] Code Pink responded that "In recent weeks, the vigil has attracted some people who have tried to change the tone and message of the vigil, including yelling and holding up inappropriate signs." They claimed the disruptive protesters are not part of their group and that they have asked them to be respectful. Code Pink also speculated that these protesters may be "infiltrators whose aim is to disrupt the vigil".[23]
In a speech on November 1, 2007, President Bush criticised Code Pink, among other antiwar groups, saying "When it comes to funding our troops, some in Washington should spend more time responding to the warnings of terrorists like Osama bin Laden and the requests of our commanders on the ground and less time responding to the demands of MoveOn.org bloggers and Code Pink protesters." [25]
During the March 2007 Senate hearings on disclosure of the classified role of Valerie Plame Wilson, for which a member of Vice President Dick Cheney's staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libby was convicted of obstruction of justice, perjury,and making false statements to federal investigators; a Code Pink activist, Midge Potts, constantly maneuvered to be in the camera views of the witness. Potts wore a pink T-shirt emblazoned "Impeach Bush". She said she was in the Judiciary Committee hearing room not to add anything to the proceedings there, but "...I switched it to the impeach during the Valerie Plame hearing mainly because it seems like that the Democrats or -- are going to push the supplemental through." [26] This action was criticized by the Capitol Hill Blue political news website on the grounds that it gave ammunition to Administration political workers to portray any complaints about the President or the occupation of Iraq as being from extremists. [27]
Conservative talk-show host Tucker Carlson criticized Pink leader Medea Benjamin for her support of Hugo Chavez. She was quoted as saying that the charge in sections of the U.S. media that Chavez had cracked down on free speech and civil rights in Venezuela was a "myth."[22] In an interview on his MSNBC show, Benjamin was asked, "Do you want to revise that given the news that Hugo Chavez has closed the last nationally broadcast opposition television station for criticizing him?" Benjamin replied that it was not true and that what happened was that Chavez simply did not renew the license because the station "participated in a coup against a democratically elected government, his [Chavez's] government." Benjamin also said "Peru recently did not renew a license. Uruguay didn‘t renew a license. Why do you hold Venezuela to a different standard?"[22] Carlson responded that a 360-page Venezuelan government-published book accused RCTV, the last independent television station closed by Chavez, of showing lack of respect for authorities and institutions. Carlson asked Benjamin, "I would think, as a self-described liberal, you would stand up for the right of people to 'challenge authorities and institutions.' And yet you are apologizing for the squelching of minority views. Why could that be?" Benjamin replied that, "They [RCTV] falsified information. They got people out on the street. They falsified footage that showed pro-Chavez supporters killing people, which did not happen. They refuse to cover any of the pro-Chavez demonstrations."[22]
According to John Tierney, writing in the conservative journal Human Events, "Code Pink’s leaders are not pacifists -- they are revolutionaries. They are not devoted to peace -- they are dedicated to political turmoil. They are not even feminists in the ordinary sense of that term. While they hold themselves out to the public as women who have left the kitchen for the street on behalf of peace, the leaders of Code Pink are actually well-organized political operatives on a radical mission... Jodie Evans, a long-time radical activist, is the nominal founder of Code Pink, but she has had plenty of help from a cadre of other radical women. ... Along with Evans, Medea Benjamin, Diane Wilson and the radical Wiccan spiritualist known as “Starhawk” helped create Code Pink. These women have close working relationships with the leaders of the other principal radical anti-war groups, including ANSWER (“Act Now to Stop War and End Racism”) and United for Peace and Justice, which is led by longtime socialist and Fidel Castro devotee Leslie Cagan... Code Pink is selective in its criticism. The group condemns only American institutions, particularly the military. Rather than condemn war in moral terms, as pacifists do, Code Pink has a calculated anti-U.S. message. It is vocal and unceasing in condemning America’s alleged sexism, racism, poverty, political and corporate corruption, and environmental degradation, and it asserts that these failings are championed by the American elite."[28]
Tierney further calls Code Pink "anti-everything about America."[29] [30]
From a financial standpoint, Code Pink receives funding from a project of a small Malibu, Calif.-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit called Environmentalism Through Inspiration & Non Violent Action (ETINA). [31] However, the person reporting to the IRS is Andrew Beath, with the last report in 12/2005. Beath's personal foundation is http://www.earthways.org/ This organization describes its mission as "Natural Resources Conservation and Protection". It describes ETINA as one of the projects it started.
In turn, at aboutus.org, which describes itself as a "community and Wiki", ETINA states it services several activist groups. Again, Andrew Heath is listed at the contact. [32]A Code Pink funding solicitation asks checks to be made out to ETINA/CODE PINK.[33] At this site, Code Pink describes itself as "a global movement of women for peace...We are a 501-C3 org and your contribution is tax deductible. Our tax exemption number is: 95-4658841."
Code Pink currently claims more than 250 chapters worldwide, from Norway to India and Costa Rica. (url=http://www.codepink4peace.org/article.php?list=type&type=3, comment=current footnote I, I believe.) This might be better suited for the lead According to the parent nonprofit’s tax form, Code Pink is run on a shoestring budget -- $130,028 in 2004. According to John Tierney, who writes very critically about CodePink, a search of philanthropic databases reveals that it received $12,000 from the Tides Foundation (2003), $5,000 from the Barbra Streisand Foundation (2004) and $5,000 from the New Priorities Foundation (2005).[28]
According to Discoverthenetworks.org, a website billing itself as a "guide to the political left" and associated with rightwing political activist David Horowitz, CodePink receives funding from several groups. "Code Pink is a member organization of the Abolition 2000, United for Peace and Justice, and After Downing Street anti-war coalitions, and a member of the National Council of Women's Organizations. As of July 2006, Code Pink claimed that more than 30,000 people were receiving its weekly updates and "alerts."...Code Pink receives financial support from the Tides Foundation, the Streisand Foundation, and the New Priorities Foundation.[34]
{{citation}}
: Unknown parameter |Page=
ignored (|page=
suggested) (help)
{{cite book}}
: |author=
has generic name (help); Unknown parameter |=
ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
{{citation}}
: Unknown parameter |Page=
ignored (|page=
suggested) (help)
{{citation}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(help)
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(help)
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help)
{{citation}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(help)
{{citation}}
: Unknown parameter |comment=
ignored (help)
{{citation}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(help)