Hello, Pseudo-Dionysius the areopagite, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 19:29, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi are you related to the recently blocked User:CatechismDatabase account by any chance? --Jules (Mrjulesd) 20:22, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
no, I do not know who this guys is (Pseudo-Dionysius the areopagite (talk) 20:32, 4 July 2019 (UTC))[reply]
Feel free to weigh in here as to whether the Celtic Christianity template should have a search box or not: User_talk:Epiphyllumlover#Search_boxes_on_templates.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 23:47, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Origen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John of Jerusalem (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Mary of Bethany into Latin Church. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have self reverted, but I think we need to have a discussion on the article's Talk page about the criteria for inclusion as a Reliable Source. Editor2020 (talk) 01:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for removing. That is one ugly image.Editor2020 (talk) 02:47, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The file File:Philbar 3 2.0.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Western Chalcedonism. Since you had some involvement with the Western Chalcedonism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Church of Antioch has been nominated for merging with Template:Patriarchates in Christianity. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 14:20, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, to the articles on Peter, Mark, and Paul you added categories labeling them as Roman Catholic missionaries - I believe this is incorrect as the Catholic Church, as an institution, did not exist in the first century - the first known use of the phrase "the catholic church" was in the letter written about 110 AD by Ignatius of Antioch and orthodox Christianity did not become predominant until the third century - I would ask you to reconsider if these categories are appropriate - on some other first-century figures you added categories labeling them as Christian missionaries, which is more accurate - cheers - Epinoia (talk) 21:53, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Coptic philosophy. Since you had some involvement with the Coptic philosophy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 20:39, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
