The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
On notability grounds. Founded a non-notable martial art variation (please see AfD debate) of a traditional stick fighting dance.Peter Rehse (talk) 06:46, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:56, 26 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete No significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. There's also no evidence to show he's notable as an academic or martial artist. Papaursa (talk) 00:45, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep References updated with orginal official copy mandat from the Egyptian Ministry of Sports commissions about Tahtib modern and urban development as a sport in Egypt – September 25th, 2013
*Keep References updated to official UNESCO Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage Nomination ninth session file no 00992 presented by Egypt states — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grenobulle (talk • contribs) 10:41, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Grenobulle, please just vote once per discussion. I struck your second vote. As far the UNESCO application goes, applying and receiving the designation are quite different and these are related to Tahtib--not to Boulad. The discussion isn't whether Tahtib is notable, it's whether Boulad is notable. Papaursa (talk) 13:21, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Papaursa, I mention both official mandat from official Egyptian state agencies, Ministry of sport commission, ministry of cultur and the permante delegation of egypt to the UNESCO, both mandat are nominatively affected to Boulad and i guess can be concidered as notable. Ps I'm new on the wikipedia governacy sorry for any error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grenobulle (talk • contribs) 17:55, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm not seeing the significant independent required to meet GNG. I'll admit I don't know what having a mandate from the government to develop a sport really means. I do know that Modern Tahtib was just considered not notable at its own AfD, so being its developer doesn't seem to meet WP:MANOTE. The UNESCO things deals with traditional Tahtib, not the modern version that Boulad has created (or it wouldn't be part of "cultural heritage").Mdtemp (talk) 18:01, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
