Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Dee's Angelical  





2 Skeptical and linguistic evaluations  





3 Leo Vinci  





4 Enochian in popular culture  



4.1  Music  





4.2  Fiction  







5 See also  





6 References  



6.1  Primary sources  





6.2  Books and articles  







7 External links  














Enochian: Difference between revisions






Asturianu
تۆرکجه
Беларуская
Brezhoneg
Deutsch
Español
فارسی
Français
Հայերեն

Polski
Português
Русский
Suomi
Türkçe
Українська
 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




Print/export  







In other projects  



Wikimedia Commons
 
















Appearance
   

 





Help
 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Browse history interactively
 Previous editNext edit 
Content deleted Content added
SmackBot (talk | contribs)
3,734,324 edits
m Date maintenance tags and general fixes
wayback replacement instead of deletion
Line 31: Line 31:

Building on Laycock’s linguistic analysis, skeptics also point out that there are even problems with holding that the texts of the Enochian keys represent a genuine [[natural language]]. It is observed that the syntax of the Enochian calls is almost identical with that of English.<ref>Laycock, p. 43. </ref> Also, the very scant evidence of Enochian [[verb conjugation]] seems quite reminiscent of English, more so than with [[Semitic languages]] as Hebrew or Arabic, which Dee claimed were debased versions of the original Angelic language.<ref> Ibid. </ref> These and other points arguably make the reception of the Enochian language less mysterious than some practitioners of [[Enochian magic]] have typically contended.

Building on Laycock’s linguistic analysis, skeptics also point out that there are even problems with holding that the texts of the Enochian keys represent a genuine [[natural language]]. It is observed that the syntax of the Enochian calls is almost identical with that of English.<ref>Laycock, p. 43. </ref> Also, the very scant evidence of Enochian [[verb conjugation]] seems quite reminiscent of English, more so than with [[Semitic languages]] as Hebrew or Arabic, which Dee claimed were debased versions of the original Angelic language.<ref> Ibid. </ref> These and other points arguably make the reception of the Enochian language less mysterious than some practitioners of [[Enochian magic]] have typically contended.



Finally, Enochian language is a hybrid language, because it uses various words taken from ordinary languages.{{Fact|date=November 2008}}

Finally, Enochian language is a hybrid language, because it uses various words taken from ordinary languages.<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20071227112822/http://members.aol.com/AJRoberti/enorg.html Aaron Leitch, "On the Origins of the Enochian Language"</ref>



==Leo Vinci==

==Leo Vinci==


Revision as of 18:23, 21 November 2008

This article is about the Angelical Language recorded in the journals of Dr. John Dee. For Dee's overall system of Angel Magic, see Enochian Magic. For other examples of divine or angelic languages, see Divine language.

Enochian is a name often applied to an occultorangelic language recorded in the private journals of Dr. John Dee and his seer Edward Kelley in the late 16th century. The men claimed that it was revealed to them by angels, while some contemporary scholars of magick consider it a constructed language.

The angelical language as revealed to Dee and Kelley encompasses a limited text corpus. Additionally, only parts of it come with English translations. Nonetheless, some linguists, notably Donald Laycock, have studied Enochian, arguing against any extraordinary features in the language.

Dee's journals did not describe the language as "Enochian," instead preferring descriptors like "Angelical", the "Celestial Speech", the "Language of Angels", the "First Language of God-Christ," the "Holy Language," or "Adamical" because, according to Dee's Angels, it was used by Adam in Paradise to name all things. The term "Enochian" comes from Dee's assertion that the Biblical Patriarch Enoch had been the last human (before Dee and Kelley) to know the language.

Dee's Angelical

According to Tobias Churton in his book The Golden Builders,[1] the concept of an Angelic or pre-deluge language was common during Dee's time. If one could speak with angels, it was believed one could directly interact with them.

In 1581, Dee mentioned in his personal journals that God had sent "good angels" to communicate directly with prophets. In 1582, Dee teamed up with the seer Edward Kelley, although Dee had used several other seers previously.[2]. With Kelley's help as a scryer, Dee set out to establish lasting contact with the angels, which resulted, among other things, in the reception of the Enochian or Angelical language.

According to Dee's journals[3], Angelical was supposed to have been the language God used to create the world, and which was later used by Adam to speak with God and the angels, and to name all things in existence. After his Fall from Paradise, Adam lost the language and constructed a form of proto-Hebrew based upon his vague memory of Angelical. This proto-Hebrew, then, was the universal human language until the time of the Confusion of Tongues at the Tower of Babel. After this, all the various human languages were developed, including an even more modified Hebrew (which we know as "Biblical Hebrew"). From the time of Adam to the time of Dee and Kelley, Angelical was hidden from humans with the single exception of the patriarch Enoch who, according to the angels, recorded the "Book of Loagaeth" (Speech From God) for humanity. The book was then lost again in the Deluge of Noah.

The reception of Enochian started on March 26 1583, when Kelley reported visions in the crystal of the twenty-one lettered alphabet characteristic of the language. A few days later, Kelley started receiving what became the first corpus of texts in the purported Angelic language. This resulted in the book Liber Loagaeth (“Book [of] Speech from God”). The book consists of 49 "calls" or prayers in the Angelic language, but also of 95 great letter tables, or squares made of 49 by 49 letters.[4] Dee and Kelly said the angels never bothered translating the texts in this book.

The other set of Enochian texts was received through Kelley about a year later, in Krakow. These are more important since they come with English translations, thus providing the basis for the Enochian vocabulary. The texts comprise 48 poetic verses, which in Dee’s manuscripts are called “Claves Angelicae”, or “Angelic Keys”. The Keys are assigned certain functions within the magical system. Dee was apparently intended to use these Keys to "open the 49 Gates of Wisdom/Understanding" represented by the 49 magic squaresinLiber Loagaeth:

I am therefore to instruct and inform you, according to your Doctrine delivered, which is contained in 49 Tables. In 49 voices, or callings: which are the Natural Keys to open those, not 49 but 48 (for one is not to be opened) Gates of Understanding, whereby you shall have knowledge to move every Gate…[5]
But you shall understand that these 19 Calls are the Calls, or entrances into the knowledge of the mystical Tables. Every Table containing one whole leaf, whereunto you need no other circumstances.[6]

While these texts contain most of the vocabulary dozens of further words are found hidden throughout Dee's journals, and thousands of undefined words are contained in the Liber Loagaeth. Marked stylistic differences between the words in Loagaeth and in the Keys have led some present-day magicians to assume that these represent two different "dialects" of the language [citation needed].

Skeptical and linguistic evaluations

Skeptics have pointed to this discrepancy between the two revealed sets of Enochian texts as an indication that Enochian is not a consistent language.[7] For instance it has been noted, especially by the Australian linguist Donald Laycock, that the texts in the Loagaeth material show phonetic features that do not generally appear in natural languages.[8] Rather, the features shown are commonly found in instances of glossolalia, suggesting that Kelley actually received at least this set via "speaking in tongues."

Building on Laycock’s linguistic analysis, skeptics also point out that there are even problems with holding that the texts of the Enochian keys represent a genuine natural language. It is observed that the syntax of the Enochian calls is almost identical with that of English.[9] Also, the very scant evidence of Enochian verb conjugation seems quite reminiscent of English, more so than with Semitic languages as Hebrew or Arabic, which Dee claimed were debased versions of the original Angelic language.[10] These and other points arguably make the reception of the Enochian language less mysterious than some practitioners of Enochian magic have typically contended.

Finally, Enochian language is a hybrid language, because it uses various words taken from ordinary languages.[11]

Leo Vinci

In 1976, Leo Vinci published a book entitled Gmicalzoma: An Enochian Dictionary.

Enochian in popular culture

Anton LaVey included nineteen of the Enochian Keys, in the original and in English translation, in his The Satanic Bible. In this same book, he says that Enochian is considered older than Sanskrit.

Occasional other references to Enochian have appeared in popular media.

Music

Fiction

See also

References

  1. ^ Churton, Tobias (2002). The Golden Builders. Signal Publishing. ISBN 0-9543309-0-0.
  • ^ Deborah Harkness, John Dee's Conversations with Angels, 16-17.
  • ^ Now in various collections of the British Library. See especially Sloane MSS 3188, 3189 and 3191, and Cotton Appendix XLVI. All the above are available in digital scans at : http://www.themagickalreview.org/enochian/mss/.
  • ^ This book is now in British Library, MS Sloane 3189.
  • ^ The angel Nalvage, cited in Casaubon ed., A True and Faithful Relation…, p. 77
  • ^ The angel Illemese, cited in Casaubon ed., A True and Faithful Relation…, p. 199)
  • ^ See Donald Laycock, "Enochian: Angelic language or mortal folly?", 19-64 in The Complete Enochian Dictionary. Also Egil Asprem, "'Enochian' Language: A proof of the existence of angels?" in Skepsis (13.12.2006), http://www.skepsis.no/marginalia/enochian_language_a_proof_of_t.html.
  • ^ Laycock, "Enochian: Angelic language or mortal folly?", p.33.
  • ^ Laycock, p. 43.
  • ^ Ibid.
  • ^ http://web.archive.org/web/20071227112822/http://members.aol.com/AJRoberti/enorg.html Aaron Leitch, "On the Origins of the Enochian Language"
  • ^ playthedamncard: Why yes, I AM a Geek God
  • Note: most of these primary sources relate to a version of this entry that was radically rewritten but is still available at http://paganpedia.mind-n-magick.com/wiki/index.php?title=Enochian

    Primary sources

    Books and articles

    External links


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Enochian&oldid=253234087"

    Categories: 
    Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes from December 2007
    Artistic languages
    Enochian magic
    Language and mysticism
    Obsolete scientific theories
    Hidden categories: 
    Articles with invalid date parameter in template
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes
    All articles with unsourced statements
    Articles with unsourced statements from September 2007
     



    This page was last edited on 21 November 2008, at 18:23 (UTC).

    This version of the page has been revised. Besides normal editing, the reason for revision may have been that this version contains factual inaccuracies, vandalism, or material not compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki