![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wikipedia is NOT CENSORED.
However, further improvements to this article would make it better.
88.105.115.225 (talk) 19:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How does it taste and what's its texture like? I've heard said that cat meat has problems in that area and that is why it is not eaten even as widely as dog is, but is this simply a myth? 82.103.215.236 22:46, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is a Wikipedia talk page, not a discussion forum. Please keep commentary related to the article. ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 11:24, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
http://blogs.sfweekly.com/foodie/2011/08/what_dogs_and_cats_taste_like.php http://boingboing.net/2011/03/23/the-taste-of-cat-don.html here are two credible sources on the taste of cat meat. I personally love cats, but I also believe I can't force anyone to not eat cats. So anyone who wants to add the taste section, be my guest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.131.222.239 (talk) 17:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The article on dog meat has nutrition facts, why not this one?SayUnclePal (talk) 20:42, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Australians cook up wild cat stew 84.64.14.109 12:03, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wild Cat is pot luck for hunters and collectors TaffyDownUnder (talk) 12:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Australian recipes for cat TaffyDownUnder (talk) 12:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How to eat cats TaffyDownUnder (talk) 12:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
When the Italians invaded Athens Greece under Mussolini, there were soon no cats left as the Italians ate them all. Feb 18, 2010 – ROME - Italian state TV has suspended a cooking show host who shocked the nation by saying cat stew is a Tuscan delicacy he has enjoyed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.4.207.4 (talk) 14:45, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see a lack of neutrality, if someone find sources for pro-eating cat it might balance it out, otherwise I'm taking it off. Its nice when people actually add this stuff in. And you people talking about what it tastes like, shut up, unless your a food reviewer and you reviewed cat or something and published that review so it became a source, your opinion doesn't matter and normal people don't want to talk about or think about their pet being eaten. And for you idiots who think its immoral or something, I think its immoral to treat cats better than cows just because I like them more, we don't treat any animals very nicely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 11:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Taste can be relevant in a discussion tab, perhaps even prompting the emergence of a credible source or constancy in opinion. As for normal people not wanting to read about their cat being eaten, I don't think they would be looking under the discussion tab of an article on cat meat. I agree with you though. It is immoral to treat cats better than cows, we really should eat them both. MjolnirX (talk) 13:52, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No,we shouldn't ,period. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.186.120.41 (talk) 03:53, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I can see you're not neutral at all. Don't proselytize neutrality when it's obvious you can't hold to it yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.119.151.233 (talk) 04:16, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Are your sure about China? Here in Central Europe people usually think it is the FRENCH who devour cats (as well as snails). People here think of chinese as the "dog-eaters", considering all three said activities extremely disgusting. 82.131.210.162 (talk) 11:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.johannes-eva.net/images/2008_05_27_redoffice_review/2008%2005%20-%20RedOffice%20-%20Screenshot%208%20Format%20Templates.png —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.131.210.162 (talk) 08:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In Israel, it is often jokingly said about meat of poor quality, especially in shawarma joints, that it is actually cat meat. As a soldier in the IDF I once heard it being said about the meat in my bases dining room. If I can find sources to back it up, would it be seen as relevant? Siúnrá (talk) 14:45, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I was offered cat to eat, in the outer suburbs of Saigon, circa 2000. I think the Vietnamese practise should be added if someone can source it. +|||||||||||||||||||||||||+ (talk) 13:02, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That is sick. People and cultures who eat cats and dogs are savage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.227.75.169 (talk) 01:43, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The article was tagged as NPOV which requires the case to be stated on the talk page. However, although the NPOV tag was dated August 2012, there are no edits on the talk page from June to October 2012, so the tag may have been an error. Also the article was tagged with refimprove, but most of the article seems to be well-referenced so the tag may have referred to an old version. It would be better to mark up using the "cn" template anything which needs better referencing, or tag up unreliable sources. Anyway I have removed both these tags. Please let me know if this is an error. JoshuSasori (talk) 14:29, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The very first sentence of the article States that it is frowned upon. The article for beef, which is considered holy by about a sixth of the worlds population, doesn't mention that it is frowned upon until the seventh section. The article for pork, which is frowned upon by a third of the worlds population, does not mention it's being frowned upon until section six. When public opinion is mentioned in the very first sentence of an article, that's a huge red flag for nuetrality. This article in drastic need of a rewrite. TBWarrior720 (talk) 22:38, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
After rereading the article, I have changed my mind about the nuetrality. However, I do have a problem with the focus of the article. There is little to nothing about the preparation and nutrition of the meat, or the names of the cuts that are eaten, that the articles on beef pork and chicken have. It is almost as if the article should be called "International oppinion of cat meat" TBWarrior720 (talk) 22:53, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't say that cats are "sometimes" eaten as famine food but always eaten when starvation occurs. This is due to the fact that they are domesticated and easily obtained. During the Siege of Leningrad, everything was eaten including other humans. Read Harrison Salisbury's "The 900 Days". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.119.151.233 (talk) 04:21, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.thedailymeal.com/9-countries-eat-cats-and-dogs-slideshow
http://www.thedailymeal.com/9-countries-eat-cats-and-dogs/11414
http://vietnamcoracle.com/cat-meat/
http://www.thedropoutdiaries.com/2012/11/the-truth-about-cats-dogs-in-vietnam/
http://www.stuff.co.nz/travel/international/5337677/Where-cat-sits-happily-on-the-menu
http://saynotodogmeat.net/2014/06/23/vietnam-brides-eat-cat-meat-for-luck/
http://saynotodogmeat.net/2013/12/19/cat-meat-in-vietnam/
http://saynotodogmeat.net/2014/06/06/vietnam-dog-and-cat-meat-restaurant-signs/
Rajmaan (talk) 05:30, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.idausa.org/campaigns/dogs-cats/dogs-and-cats-of-south-korea/
http://www.examiner. com/article/south-korea-dog-cat-meat-industry-to-face-protests
http://saynotodogmeat.net/2014/02/19/boiled-alive-cat-meat-soup-south-korea/
http://www.animalliberationfront.com/ALFront/Actions-Korea/KoreaDogMeatUpdate.htm
http://skdogcatcampaign.com/moran-market/
http://pepismartdog.com/dogmeat/?p=211
http://our-compass.org/2012/04/09/ban-south-korean-dog-and-cat-meat-trade/
Rajmaan (talk) 05:44, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure there's cat meat consumption in Korea? Because there's dog meat store but no cat meats are sold anywhere in Korea. And websites from above doesn't show any detailed information on cat meat trade in Korea, it just say dogs & cats are consumed. What a joke. Looks like author was trying very hard, but found no reputable Korean sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.200.73.34 (talk) 09:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
How is eating cat a form of entertainment? Food certainly, but not entertainment.Royalcourtier (talk) 00:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Do we have good sources that say it is legal or "isn't illegal"?
I just removed the section because these were all that were added to support it:
References
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:22, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Anna Frodesiak: do not delete cited information from an article it is considered vandalism. Do you have a citation that reflects the other two citations are wrong? IQ125 (talk) 10:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I also encourage others in the community to share their views here. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the content again per this and WP:BRD. Please find the actual law to cite or leave it out. The onus is on you to provide good sources. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
For sourcing, there was some coverage in FRENCH a few years ago, due to a dispute concerning cat meat and dog meat and a Korean importer, IIRC, so if someone could go through the La Presse or Journal de Quebec/Montreal archives, they should find it. -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 05:52, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Cat meat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Cat meat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:19, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cat meat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.nguoi-viet.com/absolutenm/anmviewer.asp?a=107622&z=5When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:22, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The section on eating cat meat in Argentina was identified as a hoax. Please, do not return it back into the article. Ifnord (talk) 15:06, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Need to add some.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Some uncensored pictures are going to encourage illegal activities in majority countries where those activities are not legal . Because of basic ethics , we should not put any uncensored images on Wikipedia . Such A Large Platform like Wikipedia must not promote ILLEGAL activities in many countries . Saiful Trismegistus (talk) 10:12, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There's a Fine Line between Crashing a Plane which is An Accident and engaging in illegal activities which is intentional . Moreover , Photos from Human Cannibalism should be removed as well as the results would be dangerous . I know that wikipedia is not censored . But they should also keep the information in their mind that they shouldn't encourage illegal activities . Wikipedia is meant to be A Safe Platform with Correct and Informative Contents rather than the information it is been provided by some wrong users . And all of them are being said from A Person who have been studying Psychology for many years . And if wikipedia takes the responsibility for the crimes other are going to commit by getting influenced by these disturbing pictures , which I guess they won't , Then I have nothing to say here . I want to conclude with the fact that all of you are going to face the consequences of your action . So just stop it regardless of your uncensored picture policy or not . Saiful Trismegistus (talk) 21:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
https://thesocietypages.org/holocaust-genocide/please-stop-using-graphic-images-in-your-class/
Saiful Trismegistus (talk) 18:27, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We must stop promoting violence in order to reduce it . Saiful Trismegistus (talk) 18:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Moreover , Wikipedia is not age-restricted which may affect children . Saiful Trismegistus (talk) 18:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Never knew that Wikipedia is such A Biased Platform with no Authentic Informations . It's not age-restricted and it promotes violence . Action must be taken against it . Saiful Trismegistus (talk) 18:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is not about Like or Dislike . You must respect Laws of Most of the Countries . Saiful Trismegistus (talk) 18:44, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
a) It isn't allowed in "Most Countries" . Even China started banning it . And who the fuck are you to make such Bullshit False assertions ? b) It's not about legality or illegality . It's about promoting violence ot not . Saiful Trismegistus (talk) 18:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
a) China banned hurting Cats . Source : https://www.four-paws.org/our-stories/press-releases/china-bans-the-selling-of-dog-and-cat-meatb) It's about promoting violence or not . Saiful Trismegistus (talk) 18:59, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OkSaiful Trismegistus (talk) 19:04, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We must not promote ILLEGAL activities regardless of Wikipedia's Policy of Censorship . Saiful Trismegistus (talk) 19:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
the footnote doesn't help, and it might be dialectical, but in Italian it would be more likely mangia rather than magna. 2607:FEA8:FF01:78AF:8D1F:AF6E:B0DB:71E3 (talk) 15:27, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is this word for word, or is it a translation from another language? The word "denigrating" is being used wrongly, so if it's a translation then it should be improved. Equinox ◑ 18:52, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]