This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Following the process to make shea butter, but starting with peanuts instead of shea nuts produces peanut butter (an edible paste made from peanuts) rather than shea butter (an edible paste made from shea nuts). That seems like a rather robust correlation to me. - SummerPhD (talk) 05:37, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Completely agree - an idiotic page. Apple butter and stroop don't even contain fats - they're molassis. Coconut butter is an oil solid at room temperature. There are margarines out there that boast I can't believe it's not butter. The only relation that these products have with butter is that they're all incorrectly called that. Unless a decent source can be found for the claim that Butters are spread food products that are prepared in a paste, syrup or liquid style, often from ground foods such as fruits and nuts it might merit deletion or at least renaming to List of spreads. With a definition of butter this wide there is no hope of ever having a page even half complete. To whom is this page of any use but to those who wrote it? Evlshout (talk) 06:24, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
still silly - obscure spreads are included, but commons ones aren't or are lumped into generic categories (tomato jelly is specifically called out, but grape jelly is lumped into fruit jelly - why one but not the other?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:801:4280:A710:E8EF:B95E:F677:44BB (talk) 16:23, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on List of spreads. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
