This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Nestlé is part of WikiProject Dietary Supplements, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to dietary supplements. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Dietary SupplementsWikipedia:WikiProject Dietary SupplementsTemplate:WikiProject Dietary SupplementsDietary supplement articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
Move 'Controversies and Criticism' to separate page[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Support - makes sense to have it as a separate page considering how big it is. LewcmTalk to me! 20:37, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Will also flag the controversies as a Split proposal. Danubeball (talk) 18:13, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Any progress on this? Trivialist (talk) 15:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I am currently trying to personally inform myself and contribute to this page on Nestle to include controversies and notes on the company's current ownership, bottling of water etc. in the state of Florida. I have a few articles I'm currently looking at from news sources in Florida and am not certain which are appropriate to cite. I have no access currently to any paywalled academic archives so am limited by google, duckduckgo, etc. in what information I can find.
The biggest thing I would like to add tonight is the word "Florida" somewhere in the page for a company that owns and is bottling, distributing, etc. all of the water in this state. Any and all assistance and/or productive correspondence would be helpful. I'll be here all night.
I'm seeing a lot about a "Seven Springs Water Company" I am not currently entirely sure if this company is owned by Nestle or still exists as its own entity and is selling water to Nestle and am actively trying to find more verifiable and well-sourced information on the topic. It is possible that a page should be made on this company.
Psicyp (talk) 03:24, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have an automated block on publishing a change to my own talk page that nobody has helped me resolve in a few minutes. Not trying to be a hassle or impatient so I'm gonna take a break for maybe half an hour.
Psicyp (talk) 04:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected edit request on 28 January 2022[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=or|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
The "M&M desexualization controversy" section needs to be removed as it is not related to Nestea. M&M is Mars product. SsBandit (talk) 04:31, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The reference used is a reflection from WP, and needs a proper reference:
"The History of Nestle, Cleverism 3 September 2015" 182.239.148.72 (talk) 05:07, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2023[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=or|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
The article is incorrect. In March 2022, Nestle had promised to sell only “essential” products like baby formula into Russia. However an article by Fortune around July 2023, reports that they have continued in peddling pet foods, pralines, chocolate bars, and other items that are hardly essential.
So in the Controversies and criticisms section, and under the Russian-Ukrainian conflict subheading. Change the second and third last sentence into, In 2022, Nestlé had pledged to suspend shipment of non-essential items but will continue to sell only essential food items like infant food and medical/hospital nutrition to Russia. However an article by Fortune published in July 2023, had criticised Nestle for continuing in selling pet foods, pralines, chocolate bars, and other items that could hardly be regarded as essential.[1]49.180.90.168 (talk) 05:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now I'm not sure if "could hardly be regarded as essential" is the correct wording here, it sounds too opinionated. If it's been criticised publicly I'd change it to something along them lines. Please try re-wording your request then reopen it by changing the 'answered' parameter on the template to 'no' LewcmTalk to me! 10:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, does anybody know what's causing a Cite Website template ({{cite web}}) script error? I don't know how to spot it, personally. Danny, JumboSizedFish (talk) 16:34, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Done Cannolis (talk) 05:18, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: I don't see how this is relevant. Callmemirela 🍁 03:47, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now I'm not sure if "could hardly be regarded as essential" is the correct wording here, it sounds too opinionated. If it's been criticised publicly I'd change it to something along them lines. Please try re-wording your request then reopen it by changing the 'answered' parameter on the template to 'no' Lewcm Talk to me! 10:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
