Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 P&G's satanic issues  
2 comments  




2 Pay ratio -- add to info box  
1 comment  




3 Failure to Maintain an Impartial Tone  
1 comment  




4 Is the carbon footprint section just marketing?  
2 comments  




5 List of brands  
2 comments  




6 Wiki Education assignment: First Year English Composition 1001  
1 comment  




7 p&g has another cleaning company  
1 comment  













Talk:Procter & Gamble




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


P&G's satanic issues[edit]

The way that Amway was very nonsense to P&G, the 1930 logo was very satanic. Apollo C. Quiboloy fans (talk) 02:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"the 1930 logo was very satanic".
How? -- Rhombuth (talk) 13:37, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay ratio -- add to info box[edit]

I would like to see the pay ratio, and possibly associated data like median pay and CEO pay added to the infobox. I have mentioned this article where I requested a "pay ratio" parameter be added to the infobox for that purpose: Template_talk:Infobox_company#Pay_ratio. --David Tornheim (talk) 13:39, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Failure to Maintain an Impartial Tone[edit]

The section Toxic shock syndrome and tampons references facts and makes claims that are related to the subject matter, but are not pertinent to addressing the controversy. Their use in the section is reminiscent of a corporate statement, not an objective encyclopedia article. This is my first comment in a long time, I apologize for not knowing the proper flags. Thanks! L. --Logzzen (talk) 08:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is the carbon footprint section just marketing?[edit]

The section about the companies carbon foot print is very short, and only cites sources directly written by P&G.

Is it really important information or just marketing non-sense? 2A02:810B:C040:1DF4:C074:BFC2:1572:9F31 (talk) 21:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interestingly, it was added by a short-term editor who added carbon footprint info to dozens of corporate pages; I guess that was their area of interest. On one hand, it could be argued that it isn't significant enough to include if independent sources haven't noted it. On the other, it could be argued that it's basic corporate information that readers these days might expect to find in an article. I don't have an opinion either way, actually. Schazjmd (talk) 22:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of brands[edit]

No mention of the brands owned by this company? MightyArms (talk) 14:43, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Procter & Gamble brands Schazjmd (talk) 15:13, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: First Year English Composition 1001[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2023 and 30 November 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CheyenneGreen (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by CheyenneGreen (talk) 15:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

p&g has another cleaning company[edit]

why is there no febreze in this article but just the companies list? Best writer and typer (talk) 01:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Procter_%26_Gamble&oldid=1221668066"

Categories: 
C-Class vital articles
Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
Wikipedia vital articles in Society and social sciences
C-Class level-5 vital articles
Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
C-Class United States articles
Low-importance United States articles
C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
C-Class Ohio articles
High-importance Ohio articles
WikiProject Ohio articles
C-Class Cincinnati articles
High-importance Cincinnati articles
WikiProject Cincinnati articles
WikiProject United States articles
C-Class company articles
Top-importance company articles
WikiProject Companies articles
C-Class home articles
Mid-importance home articles
WikiProject Home Living articles
C-Class Brands articles
High-importance Brands articles
WikiProject Brands articles
C-Class Dietary supplement articles
Mid-importance Dietary supplement articles
C-Class Food and drink articles
Low-importance Food and drink articles
WikiProject Food and drink articles
Hidden category: 
WikiProject Dietary Supplements articles
 



This page was last edited on 1 May 2024, at 08:10 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki