![]() | Quintonil has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 5, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was created or improved during WikiProject Latin America's "Latin American and the Caribbean 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out! |
![]() | A fact from Quintonil appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 June 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The result was: promotedbyBruxton talk 04:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
)
5x expanded by Tbhotch (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 47 past nominations.
(CC) Tbhotch™ 04:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC). Both articles:[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Nice work. This looks good to go. Epicgenius (talk) 14:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the QPQ: Template:Did you know nominations/Taste of Summer. (CC) Tbhotch™ 19:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
List of Michelin starred restaurants in Mexico:
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
|
Reviewing |
|
Nominator: Tbhotch (talk · contribs) 20:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk · contribs) 15:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Snatch! TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 15:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Copyedited article myself, so it should be good now; didn't find any typos. |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Lead section is of adequate length. Layout is correct per MOS:LAYOUT. Article is not bombarded with words on the WTW list. Fiction and list incorporation policies do not apply. |
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Reference section is available. |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Plenty o' reliable sources here! We've got coverage from CNN, Time Out, Eater, The Infatuation, Bon Appetit, Restaurant, Bloomberg, and El Universal. |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | Spotchecking proves there is no original research. |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violationsorplagiarism. | According to Earwig, the top result is at a 24.8% similarity. While not alarming, a considerable amount of text from the article is quoted. It can be easily paraphrased. |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Broad coverage of the restaurant's description, history, and reception can be found. This is adequate information for an article about a restaurant. |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Article is focused. |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Article is neutral; it does not try to promote or criticize the restaurant itself. |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Article is stable. |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Logo is in the public domain. Restaurant is under CC BY 2.0. Rest of the images are freely licensed. |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | While the logo and restaurant building images are relevant, the eleven food images crammed into the description section don't seem to have a purpose. However, this isn't a major obstacle, so I'll let it slide. Captions are suitable. |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. | Yum! |
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.