Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Did you know nomination  
6 comments  




2 GA Review  
8 comments  


2.1  Quickfail?  





2.2  Lead  





2.3  Description  





2.4  History  





2.5  Reception  





2.6  Spotchecking  
















Talk:Quintonil




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk pageorWikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promotedbyBruxton talk 04:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

)

5x expanded by Tbhotch (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 47 past nominations.

(CC) Tbhotch 04:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC). Both articles:[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Nice work. This looks good to go. Epicgenius (talk) 14:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Epicgenius: Hi! Thanks for reviewing it. I noticed that I could also expand List of Michelin starred restaurants in Mexico. Can I add it to this nomination as follows?

Here is the QPQ: Template:Did you know nominations/Taste of Summer. (CC) Tbhotch 19:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Michelin starred restaurants in Mexico:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: The List of Michelin starred restaurants in Mexico article is new enough, long enough, sourced, and has no issues with neutrality or plagiarism. As with my review above, the nomination is good to go with 3 bolded links. Epicgenius (talk) 20:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Quintonil/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Tbhotch (talk · contribs) 20:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk · contribs) 15:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Snatch! TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 15:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tbhotch: Finished. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 01:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Copyedited article myself, so it should be good now; didn't find any typos.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Lead section is of adequate length. Layout is correct per MOS:LAYOUT. Article is not bombarded with words on the WTW list. Fiction and list incorporation policies do not apply.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. Reference section is available.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). Plenty o' reliable sources here! We've got coverage from CNN, Time Out, Eater, The Infatuation, Bon Appetit, Restaurant, Bloomberg, and El Universal.
2c. it contains no original research. Spotchecking proves there is no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violationsorplagiarism. According to Earwig, the top result is at a 24.8% similarity. While not alarming, a considerable amount of text from the article is quoted. It can be easily paraphrased.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. Broad coverage of the restaurant's description, history, and reception can be found. This is adequate information for an article about a restaurant.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Article is focused.
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Article is neutral; it does not try to promote or criticize the restaurant itself.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Article is stable.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. Logo is in the public domain. Restaurant is under CC BY 2.0. Rest of the images are freely licensed.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. While the logo and restaurant building images are relevant, the eleven food images crammed into the description section don't seem to have a purpose. However, this isn't a major obstacle, so I'll let it slide. Captions are suitable.
7. Overall assessment. Yum!

Quickfail?

[edit]
Comment

Lead

[edit]
  • Yes. Does a term exist in English? Because I only found Menú del día
Removed

Description

[edit]
  • Changed
  • Reworded, I think.
  • I linked it to the mole itself
  • Reworded, I think, for both.
  • I removed the statement.

History

[edit]
  • Reworded, for these three points.
  • Reworded

Reception

[edit]

Spotchecking

[edit]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Quintonil&oldid=1232698313"

Categories: 
Wikipedia good articles
Agriculture, food and drink good articles
GA-Class Food and drink articles
Low-importance Food and drink articles
GA-Class Foodservice articles
Low-importance Foodservice articles
Foodservice Taskforce articles
WikiProject Food and drink articles
GA-Class Mexico articles
Low-importance Mexico articles
WikiProject Mexico articles
Articles created or improved during WikiProject Latin America's 10,000 Challenge
Wikipedia Did you know articles
 



This page was last edited on 5 July 2024, at 03:49 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki