Contents

Talk:Tilley's

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Canberra Low‑importance Tilley's is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Canberra (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Food and drink: Foodservice Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Related taskforces: /  This article is supported by the Foodservice task force (assessed as Low-importance). Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages. LGBT studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Some Changes

[edit]

I added some history on Tilley's from personal knowledge, but there should be newspaper sources for the argy-bargy with the cadets. The current description stuff is also from personal knowledge, but it seems a bit relevant.

f there is going to be a listing for Tilley's at all it needs more of the history stuff. The only reason it would merit an 'encyclopedia' reference is its importance as a pioneering women's/queer space in Canberra, and its role as a crucial neighborhood fixture and center of social life in the Inner North, with its high concentration of left/progressive intelligentsia and culture industry workers and the like.

Zerodeconduite 13:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been looking through the Canberra Times on Trove, and can't find anything about the cadets. Any ideas of a date? Sam Wilson 02:35, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was a cadet at RMC in 1984 and I never heard of such an ‘incident’. Obviously I can’t rule out the possibility, but I doubt that a ruckus of any scale wouldn’t have been a topic of discussion the following week. May I suggest that the scale of any occurrence has been exaggerated and the incident should be removed unless it can be underpinned by a credible reference. 124.168.240.170 (talk) 22:17, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]