2017
![]() ![]()
| |
---|---|
|
Women Philosophers & Women in Education online editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 02:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
![]() ![]()
| |
---|---|
|
Black Women & Women Anthropologists online editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 20:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
![]() | |
Two years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:20, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Three years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:07, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William T. Stearn you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HalfGig -- HalfGig (talk) 22:01, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
IMHO this is really good. You may want to nominate it for FA. I'd suggest having someone such as User:Jimfbleak look it over first. HalfGig talk 13:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
−
The article William T. Stearn you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William T. Stearn for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HalfGig -- HalfGig (talk) 10:02 am, Today (UTC−4)
just wanted to ensure you saw this: Wikipedia_talk:Good_article_nominations#Something_wrong_with_Legobot HalfGig talk 02:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Michael, I saw your imminent DYK on William T. Stearn in the queue and took a look, nice read. However I was alerted to two things, both the misuse of fair use claims on images. I removed one which didn't have a fair use rationale (and wouldn't ever, for use in the Stearn article at least), and started a discussion about the Google image of the front of the house. That discussion was short and sweet, it' here. The conclusion is that it should not be used under fair use. I would remove it myself and nominate the file for deletion, but I didn't want to unduly disrupt the article. Let me know if you'd like me to that, otherwise perhaps you could attend to it before it's featured on the main page. Letting KAVEBEAR and Yoninah know too who reviewed and promoted it without checking these things. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On10 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William T. Stearn, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the British botanist Professor William Stearn never attended university nor earned a degree, because his family was too poor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William T. Stearn. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, William T. Stearn), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:17 High Park Road.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
![]() Women's History Month worldwide online editathon Facilitated by Women in Red | ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 22:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply] |
I made two test edits to William T. Stearn to show you what I mean. You can revert them if you wish. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 21:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Out of town today, so will take a while to get back to article. All comments taken in constructive context and vice versa. Michael Goodyear (talk) 12:06, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
![]()
Welcome to Women in Red's | ||
![]() ![]()
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) ----Rosiestep (talk) 18:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
![]()
Welcome to Women in Red's | ||
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
![]() |
The 2016 Cure Award |
In 2016 you were one of the top ~200 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs. |
Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
![]() Welcome to Women in Red's June 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
![]() ![]()
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 20:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Тахтаджян, Армен Леонович.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:44, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
![]() Welcome to Women in Red's July 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
![]() ![]()
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 02:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
![]() |
The Technical Barnstar |
For Wikiguide , Botany Resources, Clades, images etc. RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 14:50, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
![]() A new initiative for worldwide online coverage: 1day1woman | ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 03:00, 28 July 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply] |
![]() Welcome to Women in Red's August 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
![]() ![]()
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --
![]() WiR's new initaitve: 1day1woman for worldwide online coverage Facilitated by Women in Red | ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
Articles that you have been involved in editing—Monotypic taxon and Monospecificity—have been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Nessie (talk) 19:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your work on HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer is great and much appreciated. Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 19:02, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Michael, havent been around for some time. I made photo of flower, wanted to nominate it on Valued Image, but not sure which word to use it. Cirsium eriophorum blooming or blossoming ? regards. --PetarM (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
![]() Welcome to Women in Red's September 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
![]() ![]()
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
See also sections are not supposed to contain items already linked in the article which those are. Plus the sections are discouraged in high quality articles. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Hi. I can see from the information on your profile that you work in the academia. Actually, I wish I had seen this profile before.
Have you seen any of my message here or on commons or wikiversity about the upcoming WSC 2017?
I am looking for active wikimedia users with academic background and some bibliometric record (so I can prepare or use their wikidata items) to work as jurors. Specifically I am looking for people from countries without a national jury such as Canada or New Zealand.
I am sorry that we basically completed the final jury and if you are interested to join at that level, I can only offer you a place in the second-level jury. We might create different second-level juries for different areas of the world if we have enough jurors. Would you be interested in any case?
The jurors are not supposed to be all wikimedians, but we wish to promote the use of the images on the platforms and show that there is a continuum between the wiki-world and the academia. At the same time, I want all the jurors to show they are involved in the peer-reviewed process, so the uploaders can see they are students and researchers like them.
Let me know. The event starts on 01/11/2017 or maybe two weeks later. We can define the last details of the jury during the month of November, but we'd like to be almost ready in two weeks, in order to provide the challengers with a rough idea of the composition of the juries. Jurors work after the competition.
In any case, we can contact you next time if you are still interested but you can't join this time.
Also if you can spread the news around in your working environment, that would be great!
Regards.--Alexmar983 (talk) 08:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
![]() ![]()
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
-Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
![]() ![]() ![]()
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Ipigott (talk) 13:02, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Michael, i got new pic of Orchid Zygopetalum were is written Zygopetalum spec. Dunkle Blüte. I checked all on Google and specimen is probably hybrid with unknown parental status ? There are some similar, but couldnt find so much redish leafs like here, while violet-white is visible on some other specimens. --PetarM (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So naming Zygopetalum (Dunkle Blüte) would be best here ? --PetarM (talk) 22:59, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Michael Goodyear. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]