This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hi! Thank you for subscribing to the WikiProject X Newsletter. For our first issue...
Has WikiProject X changed the world yet? No.
We opened up shop last month and announced our existence to the world. Our first phase is the "research" phase, consisting mostly of reading and listening. We set up our landing page and started collecting stories. So far, 28 stories have been shared about WikiProjects, describing a variety of experiences across numerous WikiProjects. A recurring story involves a WikiProject that starts off strong but has trouble continuing to stay active. Most people describe using WikiProjects as a way to get feedback from other editors. Some quotes:
"Working on requested articles, utilising the reliable sources section, and having an active WikiProject to ask questions in really helped me learn how to edit Wikipedia and looking back I don't know how long I would have stayed editing without that project." – Sam Walton on WikiProject Video Games
"I believe that the main problem of the Wikiprojects is that they are complicated to use. There should be a a much simpler way to check what do do, what needs to be improved etc." – Tetra quark
"In the late 2000s, WikiProject Film tried to emulate WP:MILHIST in having coordinators and elections. Unfortunately, this was not sustainable and ultimately fell apart." – Erik
Of course, these are just anecdotes. While they demonstrate what is possible, they do not necessarily explain what is typical. We will be using this information in conjunction with a quantitative analysis of WikiProjects, as documented on Meta. Particularly, we are interested in the measurement of WikiProject activity as it relates to overall editing in that WikiProject's subject area.
We also have 50 people and projects signed up for pilot testing, which is an excellent start! (An important caveat: one person volunteering a WikiProject does not mean the WikiProject as a whole is interested; just that there is at least one person, which is a start.)
While carrying out our research, we are documenting the problems with WikiProjects and our ideas for making WikiProjects better. Some ideas include better integration of existing tools into WikiProjects, recommendations of WikiProjects for people to join, and improved coordination with Articles for Creation. These are just ideas that may or may not make it to the design phase; we will see. We are also working with WikiProject Council to improve the directory of WikiProjects, with the goal of a reliable, self-updating WikiProject directory. Stay tuned! If you have any ideas, you are welcome to leave a note on our talk page.
Thanks for the project's first newsletter, Harej. NORTHAMERICA1000 15:55, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Sakotis!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Here's a Sakotis for you! This cake promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving this cake to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing! Hafspajen (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Oh, it was rather exciting... to compare them. Hafspajen (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Hafspajen: With some more work, the article can qualify for WP:DYK. Every paragraph needs at least one inline citation to a reliable source to qualify... NORTHAMERICA1000 12:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!Hafspajen (talk) 13:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
You mean ... that I shall start writing cake articles ??Hafspajen (talk) 15:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Hafspajen: If you write 10 cake articles a week, that would create a lot in a year (520). NORTHAMERICA1000 15:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Yeah ... I think I can do one or two, at least. Looks like the Nordic countries cakes are missing. Feel free to nominate that to DYK, but I rather stay away from the DYK nowadays. Hafspajen (talk) 15:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
...(It's still Tuesday here on my spot on the planet)... NORTHAMERICA1000 16:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes. And same year King Pabo Post PrydaininNorthern England abdictaed from his throne and divided the kingdom between his two sons, while he retired as a hermittoAnglesey. In the mean while - the construction of the Basilica of San Vitale in Ravenna, was started. Hafspajen (talk) 16:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
St. Seraphim of Sarov sharing his meal with a bear. St. Seraphim of Sarov lived as a hermit for 25 years.
Hafspajen: Hermit is an interesting topic, why would someone want to be a hermit? NORTHAMERICA1000 16:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Well, for a number of reasons. Contemplating mysteries - that's kind difficult if people are not left alone. Then some people like this kind of meditative type of life. Philosophers do that, they think better when not distracted. Some do that to practice very intricated spiritual excercises - both Buddists, Chritians and Muslims do that, and that's a lot of hard work, even if you can't notice anything from the outside. Hafspajen (talk) 16:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
And some do that for a greater good, like your hermit = "Acquire a peaceful spirit, and around you thousands will be saved." Hafspajen (talk) 16:28, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Northamerica1000 - this was a typical comment from a food editor... Hafspajen (talk) 16:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Hafspajen: Monks/hermits produce what is arguably some of the best beer on the planetEarth. Therefore and as such, Hermits rock. NORTHAMERICA1000 16:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of brand name snack foods, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
About your (non)participation in the January 2012 SOPA vote
Hi Northamerica1000. I am Piotr Konieczny (User:Piotrus), you may know me as an active content creator (see my userpage), but I am also a professional researcher of Wikipedia. Recently I published a paper (downloadable here) on reasons editors participated in Wikipedia's biggest vote to date (January 2012 WP:SOPA). I am now developing a supplementary paper, which analyzes why many editors did not take part in that vote. Which is where you come in :) You are a highly active Wikipedian (41st to be exact), and you were active back during the January 2012 discussion/voting for the SOPA, yet you did not chose to participate in said vote. I'd appreciate it if you could tell me why was that so? For your convenience, I prepared a short survey at meta, which should not take more than a minute of your time. I would dearly appreciate you taking this minute; not only as a Wikipedia researcher but as a fellow content creator and concerned member of the community (I believe your answers may help us eventually improve our policies and thus, the project's governance). PS. If you chose to reply here (on your userpage), please WP:ECHO me. Thank you! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Conboy456 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Software changes this week
The new version of MediaWiki has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since February 11. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from February 17. It will be on all Wikipedias from February 18 (calendar).
On Wednesday your Meta user page will be shown if you don't have a user page on a wiki. [1][2][3]
You can now change the order of categories in VisualEditor using drag-and-drop. [4]
In VisualEditor, you now need to make a change before you can "Apply Changes" to citations and templates. [5]
The way the cursor moves in VisualEditor is changing. Your browser now handles the cursor directly. Most of you will see no change. In right-to-left text, the cursor now moves in a 'visible' rather than 'logical' way. This is like other sites but you may be surprised at first. [6]
Meetings
The VisualEditor Team had their first public bug triage meeting on February 11. They will post the results on the meeting page. [7]
You can join the second weekly meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meetings you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The meeting will be on February 18 at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join. [8]
You can join a meeting with the developers of the Content Translation tool. It will be on February 18 at 13:00 (UTC). [9]
Hey bro,
I made it. Template:Valentine Greetings. Check it and hit it. Its just another copy of our seasonal greetings template with some trifles and web color magic. - The Herald (here I am) 15:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
HiThe Herald: Looks real nice, with a polished layout. Good work. NORTHAMERICA1000 15:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Now I am going to use AWB to sent out the greetings. The module is set and is working (with a little more fixes). But AWB uses categories for faster work and so is it advisable to create a category like this. If yes, under which cat will it fall? I have no mass-message mailing list, hence this tricks and magic. - The Herald (here I am) 14:13, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
The Herald: Make sure to send me one...! I don't have any preliminary advice; seems like you know what you're doing, so be bold. NORTHAMERICA1000 14:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
No, I just wanna know that can I create such a category or not? - The Herald (here I am) 14:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
The Herald: Should be all right, in my humble opinion. WP:USERNOCAT has no stipulation against what you are looking to accomplish. Also, as an example, I maintain a mailing list at User:Northamerica1000/Mailing list, which is similar to what you're looking to create. NORTHAMERICA1000 14:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Well, I have seen your page, but that needs mass-message right to compile. - T H (here I am) 15:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
The Herald: I appreciate your insistence to keep things on the up-and-up. In my opinion, I don't forsee anyone challenging the page you're looking to create, and I admire your creativity. You should provide a notice somewhere in your message with a link to your cat page, with an opt-out option for people to remove their name if they choose. If you only send it to friends, it's possible that nobody will actually opt-out. This could be in fine (small) print at the end of the template you're looking to send, in your signature area, etc. NORTHAMERICA1000 15:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Like Technical 13 once had it. Well, now I think User:The Herald/Mailing List is better because I need to use HotCat first to link my friends' user talk and then go to AWB and then have all of it messed up. So now I am going for MediaWiki or some other alternate. Anyway, you are the one whom I will test it first. So be ready.. - T H (here I am) 15:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
No worries, and feel free to use my talk page to test it out. NORTHAMERICA1000 15:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
HiDissidentAggressor: Upon further consideration, along with source searches that provided almost no coverage in reliable sources about the album or information to qualify the topic per WP:NALBUMS, I have closed the discussion as SOFTDELETE. The article has been deleted. NORTHAMERICA1000 14:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
If you went to the trouble of searching for sources yourself, why didn't you comment on the afd instead? —Cryptic 15:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The discussion had been relisted twice with no participation, and as such (upon reconsideration) I essentially treated it like an expired prod. When performing soft deletion closures, I may double check matters (e.g. source availability), as a measure toward the reliability of the soft deletion. The nomination appeared to be correct, but in some cases (with other users in various discussions), this is not always the case. NORTHAMERICA1000 15:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
I would have been more impressed if Cryptic could tell that how that AfD misrepresented any of the policy. Cryptic, can you? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Just redirecting would have been faster and easier, yes, but there's no misrepresentation going on here. Deletion doesn't preclude mention in the artists' articles when there isn't any merger; there was nothing reasonably worth merging; disambiguated article titles make for miserably poor redirects; and there's a question of which of the two artist's articles to redirect to. And as long as we're in wikilawyer mode, it's not a policy. —Cryptic 15:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks NA1000. sorry to stir up a hornet's nest here. The Dissident Aggressor 12:43, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
It's all good. Go ahead and thump the hornet's nest, like a piñata...NORTHAMERICA1000 15:11, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Design theory, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Nelson and Luhmann. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
How is an AfD with no opposition after three weeks "no consensus"? Deunanknute (talk) 06:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
HiDeunanknute: No consensus emerged in the AfD discussion, as you were the only person who contributed to it. Note that I closed the discussion with the WP:NPASR clause, so feel free to renominate the article if you'd like. NORTHAMERICA1000 06:18, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Diligence
What an amazing job you did with Snail caviar - that's an exceptional example of how to rescue an article. Sterling work, as always. Yunshui雲水 15:16, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Yunshui: Thanks for the star, and happy editing. NORTHAMERICA1000 14:14, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Valentine Greets!!!
Valentine Greets!!!
Hello Northamerica1000, love is the language of hearts and is the feeling that joins two souls and brings two hearts together in a bond. Taking love to the level of Wikipedia, spread the WikiLove by wishing each other Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.
Sending you a heartfelt and warm love on the eve,
Happy editing,
- T H (here I am) 12:10, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for giving me a warning for something I did weeks ago. I'm sure you feel proud that you have used your powers to create something out of nothing and made it look good. Please, never, ever message me again for any reason. Abusedone (talk) 15:52, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Please seriously consider being civil in your comments on Wikipedia talk pages. Your comment I warned you about here is inappropriate, and does nothing to improve the encyclopedia. As such, I have removed the uncivil content (diff), per WP:REFACTOR. Please consider making positive contributions to Wikipedia instead. Then you won't receive such warning messages from users on your talk page. NORTHAMERICA1000 03:04, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Blitz: Thanks to everyone who participated in the February Blitz. Of the 21 people who signed up, eight copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.
Progress report: The blitz removed 16 articles from the requests list, and we're almost done with December 2014. Many thanks, everyone!
Drive: The month-long March drive begins in about a week. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the backlog. Sign up here!
Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Jonesey95, Biblioworm and Philg88.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Well, you undo-ed my edit. In case you hadn't noticed, {{Non-free use rationale}} and {{Non-free use rationale 2}} are essentially the same thing. The latter is used when the uploader uses the File Upload Wizard. And using the transclusion count, we understand how many non-free images were uploaded through FUW. Well, since you already have one rationale, I don't know why you should put another one, it's redundant. Hope, I could clarify. ;) --QEDK ♠ T ♥ C 11:40, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
HiQEDK: Turns out you were right, the second template is unnecessary because Template:Non-free use rationale covers all of the criteria. When using the upload wizard, it adds the second template in the Licensing section of file pages, which I figured would be good to fill-in to ensure all bases are covered. However, the bases were already covered. As such I have reverted my edit back to the one you provided. Thanks for the input. NORTHAMERICA1000 15:46, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Haha, cheers! --QEDK ♠ T ♥ C 15:55, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
I like your thank you's. By the way, why not have a favour of filling out all extra missing articles from the schedule into the WP:TAFIACCOMP whenever I am busy? I may be busy from exams, and especially because I have started Year 11 (or Grade 10). Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
HiQwertyxp2000: I don't mind the suggestion, but I cannot guarantee anything or commit to specific future work at this time. Between the stuff I do working on articles and working at AfD, time becomes strained. I noticed that you have been the primary updater to the TAFIACCOMP page, which is appreciated. Perhaps notify members about this matter at WT:TAFI. NORTHAMERICA1000 09:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Need to restore Charles LaDuca
Hello, I would like to get the content for Charles LaDuca restored and keep it up. What can I do? Can I start over in such a way that it does not get removed? I don't really understand why it was removed in the first place. I can see peoples comments but don't see how the page even looked when they were commenting. Please advise what is proper procedure in this situation? Thank You very much. The link to the deletion follows 04:38, 2 February 2015 Northamerica1000 (talk | contribs) deleted page Talk:Charles LaDuca (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles LaDuca) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cfisher54 (talk • contribs)
Hello Cfisher54: Consensus at the AfD discussion was unanimous for deletion due to a lack of notability for the subject as per Wikipedia's standards. Notability for biography articles on Wikipedia is typically established by the existence of multiple independent, third-party reliable sources about this subject that provide significant coverage. The specific notability criteria for biography articles is located at WP:BASIC. Up to the time before the article was deleted, the following two sources were present in the article as references, both of which are directory listings that don't qualify as reliable sources: [10], [11]. If you are able to provide proper sources as described above (reliable, and that provide significant coverage), please provide them here. Thanks, NORTHAMERICA1000 11:21, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you!
You have been an encouragement to me here on Wikipedia by leaving me a cheerful banner on my talk page. Your thoughtfulness is appreciated.
Bfpage: Thanks for your ongoing contributions to Wikipedia. NORTHAMERICA1000 12:31, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Akple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corn flour. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Northamerica1000. You have new messages at Talk:Danish pastry. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
North, WHERE ARE you? An experienced food editor is needed asap at the Danish pastry to clear up the mess... We need an experienced food editor - somebody who can give a clear and concise overview of the subject and keep a cool head. Hafspajen (talk) 06:43, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
HiHafspajen: I may opine there eventually, and it's possible I may not. With three new relatively detailed/long discussion threads on the article's talk page this month, there's a lot to sift through, and I'm presently working in several other areas. As per the discussion there, a new Pastry of Denmark article could be created, although I feel that this title would be best used to summarize all pastries from Denmark, rather than one.
For what it's worth, and as a side note, in contemporary times in the U.S., a "Danish" pastry is arguably a generic term for several types of pastries, which may differ from the original Danish pastry from Denmark. In my opinion, it's best to base the article upon the original Danish pastry, and include other types in the Varieties or other possible new section(s). NORTHAMERICA1000 13:10, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
How do the US pastry look like, that's what I would like to know. Hafspajen (talk) 13:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
The problem is that it is different even among the Scandinavian countries. This is about how it looks [www.lantmannen-unibake.com/Global/.../Butiksbakat] in Sweden. It is called Wienerbrød[12][13] in Norway. In Finland is called viineri [14] and looks like this. In Denmark they have several types. How does US Danish look like? Hafspajen (talk) 13:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Hafspajen: I hesitate to provide a definitive answer without performing adequate research, but here are some book links that provide more information:
Very interesting. Nr 7 gives me that the classic filling is remonce. Hafspajen (talk) 14:48, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
New it was going to ***. They draged it to ANI. Hafspajen (talk) 23:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
North, I was thinking about this and I think that my cake-editorship ends here. You very kindly encouraged me and expressed support for my continued editing of cake articles, asked me to create more of them, but after this Danish pastry-experience - I will never edit any cake articles again. Appart from the fact that the wienerbröd (and a red link as you see) - the Swedish variety of this pastry - has indeed a huge cultural significance for us, Swedes, as a part of our variety of the the afternoon tea ceremony -Fika (coffee break) - something that other editors didn't understood - looks like everybody (incuding Floquenbeam and EdJohnston) thinks that we are all out of our minds. It might have been a culture shock - related issue, but this from now on will prevent me to enter cake territory again. I created one article, failed to make a point on an other, has been declared disruptve - and this is not my cup of tea. Never knew desserts make people react like this. I am very sorry but I will not create thos articles that I promised I will. I kinda agree with Floquenbeam comment here telling to one of the Danish pastry editors - I don't think interacting with you further would be of any use whatsoever; - I agree with him there. Hafspajen (talk) 12:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Do what you feel is best for yourself. However, I wouldn't extrapolate the situation that has occurred in re Danish pastry as likely to occur regarding all food articles. Actually, most food topics on Wikipedia are seriously lacking editors to expand and maintain present articles and create new ones. NORTHAMERICA1000 14:14, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! You should get co-creation credit as should MelanieN. :) LadyofShalott 16:33, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
LadyofShalott: Feel free to addend the nomination with the above, if you'd like. NORTHAMERICA1000 16:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Count me out. I only contributed to the article Chicken shit. I have no interest in this agricultural article. --MelanieN (talk) 16:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Good morning! (at least it is morning where I am in Southern California). I wanted to first and foremost thank you for your numerous copyedits on pages I had recently worked on. Always great to have someone double check me and clean up my stupid typos. :-p I also wanted to talk with you and get your input about something. I noticed that you added a couple of lists to the US state fire department navigational boxes, such as the List of New York fire departments. I didn't realize that these lists existed so thanks for pointing them out! I'm curious whether you think these lists still serve a purpose. In my opinion these lists should really be deleted because they will never be complete. I was thinking of having them simply redirect to the state category, so for example List of New York fire departments would redirect to Category:Fire departments in New York since this category basically automatically updates.
I am still relatively new and learning the ways of Wikipedia. Thanks for your assistance! Your colleague, --Zackmann08 (talk) 16:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
HiZackmann08: The lists can include content that categories cannot, such as descriptions, images, references, external links, etc. For more information about lists relative to categories see WP:NOTDUP. Also, categories often don't receive many page views, and hence aren't used much. For example, see (check views), but ignore the most recent figures on the bar graph, which are skewed per the page views I have done there today. NORTHAMERICA1000 18:04, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Ah good points! Thank you for pointing that out. :-) --Zackmann08 (talk) 18:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
A strange page move caused a AFD to go away it seems
So I marked this Martin Hristov (footballer, born 1997) as a duplicate article of a article that is up for a afd Hristov Martin. Instead of the user participating in this he just moved all of this and now the AFD is kind of messed up looking now. Not sure what to say. Wgolf (talk) 23:25, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
-Looks like it was fixed! Wgolf (talk) 23:41, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
The new version of MediaWiki has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since February 18. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from February 25. It will be on all Wikipedias from February 26 (calendar).
It is now easier to see template fields in VisualEditor. The fields are bigger. [25]
It is now easier to see when a button is disabled in VisualEditor. [26]
Sometimes when you copy-pasted a template in VisualEditor, it was replaced by HTML. This problem is now fixed. [27]
Tools in Labs will stop working for a few hours on February 24. [28]
Meetings
You can read the notes from the last meeting with the VisualEditor team.
You can join the next weekly meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meetings you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The meeting will be on February 26 at 00:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
At the moment you need to log in to edit Wikimedia wikis on mobile devices. You can say if anyone should be allowed to edit on the mobile sites. The discussion ends on March 15.
Images in the interface will soon work better in Opera 12. [29]
HiDrmies: I'll keep the suggestions in mind. I have a pretty full plate with various present and planned activities, so I may not get to these. One person can only do so much, and I don't want to burn out by trying to cover to many things at once. NORTHAMERICA1000 20:48, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
If you know anyone else with some relevant skills, ask them please--it would make for nice cleanup. I wish that the TfD process were automated, like AfD. Drmies (talk) 20:49, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent software changes
A Lua function to use Wikidata has changed. You need to update the pages that use it. [30]
You can use the Content Translation tool on Wikipedia in Uzbek and Minangkabau. You need to enable it in your Beta options.
You can now hide banners if you don't have an account. [31][32]
Software changes this week
The new version of MediaWiki has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since February 25. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from March 3. It will be on all Wikipedias from March 4 (calendar).
You can use the Content Translation tool on Wikipedia in Punjabi and Kyrgyz. You can ask for the tool in other languages.
Editing the fake blank line in VisualEditor is now simpler. This change also fixed a few bugs. [33][34][35][36]
The TemplateData editor now warns you if a related page already has TemplateData. [37]
The TemplateData table now tells you if a template doesn't take any parameters. [38]
Meetings
You can read the notes from the last meeting with the VisualEditor team.
You can join the next weekly meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meetings you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The meeting will be on March 4 at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join technical meetings in France and Mexico this year. You will be able to ask for help if you can't pay yourself. [39]
Future changes
You will be able to get a direct link for a section of a page. [40]
??Hafspajen (talk) 15:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Resolved
- The Herald (here I am) 15:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
NORTHAMERICA1000 15:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
NORTHAMERICA1000 15:11, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Fixed. NORTHAMERICA1000 10:36, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Done. NORTHAMERICA1000 01:24, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
