●Stories
●Firehose
●All
●Popular
●Polls
●Software
●Thought Leadership
Submit
●
Login
●or
●
Sign up
●Topics:
●Devices
●Build
●Entertainment
●Technology
●Open Source
●Science
●YRO
●Follow us:
●RSS
●Facebook
●LinkedIn
●Twitter
●
Youtube
●
Mastodon
●Bluesky
Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter
Forgot your password?
Close
wnewsdaystalestupid
sightfulinterestingmaybe
cflamebaittrollredundantoverrated
vefunnyunderrated
podupeerror
×
180573556
story
Posted
by
msmash
ary 13, 2026 @09:44AM
from the no-distractions dept.
Meta has begun laying off more than 1,000 employees from its Reality Labs division as the company redirects resources away from virtual reality and metaverse products toward AI wearables and smartphone features. The cuts amount to roughly 10% of Reality Labs' 15,000-person workforce, according to an internal post from CTO Andrew Bosworth reviewed by Bloomberg.
Reality Labs has lost more than $70 billion since the start of 2021, and top executives discussed budget cuts as deep as 30% for the metaverse group in December. Meta plans to continue developing its Horizon metaverse platform, but the focus will shift almost exclusively to mobile phones rather than the fully immersive VR headsets the company originally envisioned.
Related Links
Microsoft Pledges Full Power Costs, No Tax Breaks in Response To AI Data Center Backlash
Signal Creator Marlinspike Wants To Do For AI What He Did For Messaging
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Load All Comments
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
/Sea
Score:
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
More
Login
Forgot your password?
Close
Close
Log In/Create an Account
●
All
●
Insightful
●
Informative
●
Interesting
●
Funny
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
byMikeDataLink ( 536925 ) writes:
when they screw that up just as badly.
twitter
facebook
byLuthair ( 847766 ) writes:
It's almost like having one person holding the majority of voting shares is a bad idea...
byPseudonymous Powers ( 4097097 ) writes:
I think it may also have been a bad idea for the media, for a decade, to uncritically and near-universally hail as a epochal genius a man whose big innovation was: rating college women for hotness. Oh, on the internet, I guess.
Parent
twitter
facebook
bytimeOday ( 582209 ) writes:
We have a way to quantify whether successes outweigh screwups overall, and that is money. The Cybertruck is a failure that will surely be studied for decades as an example of too much investment following one man's whimsy. On the other hand the same guy picked the major objectives of SpaceX. Which outweighs the other? It's a pretty simple calculation.
bykellin ( 28417 ) writes:
No, but they're both grifters who think they are smarter than anyone else on the planet.
●nt threshold.
byFly Swatter ( 30498 ) writes:
Look at it from another angle, those people had jobs all this time that maybe weren't needed. You have to create jobs before you can fire anyone.
byLocke2005 ( 849178 ) writes:
One can certainly draw parallels between the massive overinvestment in Metaverse development that occurred a few years ago and the even more massive overinvestment in AI, especially data center buildout, going on right now.
byThud457 ( 234763 ) writes:
This seems to indicate that Facebook won't be able to successfully immantenize the torment nexus.
But then again, other people, like Peter Thiel are also trying to push us in that direction.
bylarryjoe ( 135075 ) writes:
One can certainly draw parallels between the massive overinvestment in Metaverse development that occurred a few years ago and the even more massive overinvestment in AI, especially data center buildout, going on right now.
True. However, the big differences are current revenue and use cases. The Metaverse had no revenue and no use cases (at least none that people would pay for). That's also the difference between the current AI boom/bubble and the dot.com bubble.
byallo ( 1728082 ) writes:
Meta can't focus. And they already seem to have lost track with LLM. At least rumors are they are now rather searching for super intelligence than building new llama models.
bystealth_finger ( 1809752 ) writes:
No one wanted their VR hellscape and no one wants the AI hellscape either.
twitter
facebook
byDan Posluns ( 794424 ) writes:
Multiple billions of dollars, more than the GDP of some countries, spent in under a decade on a vision of the future that never even passed a basic smell test. Back in 2020 or so I was working on video game teams and we were seeing a big brain-drain to Facebook, with them basically waving huge wads of cash to poach our people to build their metaverse. I don't think any of the people that left were drinking the Kool Aid (at least not the ones I knew of), but it was a good way to make money fast working on cool tech, even if the customers for it only ever existed in Zuckerberg's imagination.
twitter
facebook
byfuzzyfuzzyfungus ( 1223518 ) writes:
The exceptionally weird thing about the 'metaverse' hype was how big it managed to get despite existing tech actively suggesting that it would not be all that exciting
The lesson of video games; all the way back to the multi-user dungeons, is absolutely that there's interest and money in multi-user simulated environments; but also that the field is dominated by task specific implementations. There's not 'the metaverse' where you walk over to the WWII section if you want to play Call of Duty; and over to the fantasy section if you want to play World of Warcraft; and over to your employer's gimmicky virtual office building if you need to teleconference. And this isn't just some imperfect temporary thing: the various implementations actively prioritize different things; including choices where the options are mutually exclusive, in order to be the right thing for the job. There are 'generic' virtual worlds(eg. Second Life); but those tend to pay a pretty heavy cost vs. the specialized ones in order to be generic, and are kind of niche. Second Life is a perfectly viable business if you can keep your operations costs under control; but the idea that it's suddenly going to have the GDP of western europe because 'metaverse' is...dubious.
Then there's the close competition from things that are, technically, not 'metaverse' as Neal Stephenson and Hiro Protagonist would have it; but are definitely potential substitutes: video games you play with monitors, teleconferencing you do with webcams, stuff you do on the go on cellphones. Obviously there are some things that would be better, or more immersive, or whatever with VR googles; but predicting hypergrowth when the market is already saturated with stuff that is maybe 80% as good is nuts.
Parent
twitter
facebook
byflyingfsck ( 986395 ) writes:
The Metaverse idea looked like MS Bob reincarnated. I cannot fathom how anyone could think that it would work.
byevil_aaronm ( 671521 ) writes:
Ok, I've seen this bandied about a few times: What the heck is the "metaverse"? I use FB, that's it. (And that's bad enough, but that's another post.) Is there something to Meta more than FB? Is it worth anyone's time, or is it just more schlock?
byDan Posluns ( 794424 ) writes:
If you ask 3 different CEOs this question you're liable to get 4 different answers.
From the Facebook/Meta perspective, it appears to means a virtual world with virtual avatars that you would use for everything from corporate meetings to social games to who knows what else. But it's also AR glasses. Or something.
byTwistedGreen ( 80055 ) writes:
It was an online chatroom service called Meta Horizon. You could access it with a Meta Quest device, and wander around some empty virtual worlds or play some minigames while talking to random people. That's about it.
byThud457 ( 234763 ) writes:
This bad news makes Lt. Dan sad.
bytoxonix ( 1793960 ) writes:
We had this in 1994. I used one of the first VRML browsers in around 1999. My friend was working on it before he came to the game company we worked for. It was fun to fly around in VRML land running into random users with bad network connections. We had the metaverse already. It wasn't cool then for the same reasons it isn't cool now. VR is not really that great if it doesn't interface directly with your brain. VR goggles are good for telepresence - drone pilots or robot operators. I'm sure there's a market
byDan Posluns ( 794424 ) writes:
I'm sure a lot of useful science was done and (maybe less-useful) tech was invented, but at what opportunity cost? The bigger picture here is that one dude with extraordinary wealth and power made a massive bet on an obscenely stupid vision of the future. I'm not saying we shouldn't have visionaries in our society, but it's a fairly novel thing that they must drag the livelihoods of so many employees and so much of our economy with them.
byLocke2005 ( 849178 ) writes:
Actually, yes. A lot of the research Meta has done for VR controllers has spin-off benefits in telepresence, or as Meta calls it, Teleoperation. Also spin-off benefits in training robots. Remember, Reality Labs is primarily a research division, as well as being Meta's devices division. Meta, Amazon, and Google are all leaning more heavily into devices now. Apparently that's where the money is. And when I think of devices, I think of... sexbots!
byTwistedGreen ( 80055 ) writes:
They do have some really nice technology. The hand tracking specifically is very impressive; you can interact with everything without a controller. Great for stationary games like darts. But they're really struggling to find a killer app.
● threshold.
byHoi Polloi ( 522990 ) writes:
They are doing everything they can to drive me away from their platforms. My main use of FB at this point is to stay in communication with some people and a couple of special interest groups I run.
byLocke2005 ( 849178 ) writes:
I find Twitter much more useful for staying in touch with my Klan brothers... /s
byflyingfsck ( 986395 ) writes:
I only use FB to get my municipal garbage pickup schedule. If that is any indication of how useful FB is to most people, then maybe it is time to sell their stock.
byKnown Nutter ( 988758 ) writes:
It's amazing. Facebook continues to exist on the back of millions of excuses.
byawwshit ( 6214476 ) writes:
> Reality Labs has lost more than $70 billion since the start of 2021
That is more than $1B per month!
bymarcle ( 1575627 ) writes:
Zuck had an idea once of how to appeal to peoples' basest instincts, and rode it to a substantial fortune. Since then, all he knows how to do is chase the latest trend, and he's not very good at it.
twitter
facebook
byfropenn ( 1116699 ) writes:
I have no idea what Zuck was thinking the Metaverse would become. Second Life (is / was) an earlier version of what it sounds like he was thinking for the Metaverse. And that turned out horribly for just about everyone. The primary activity, other than sexual assault or violence, was gambling, followed by speculation on "real estate." A few people still go to Second Life, apparently, but no one really wants it and there's no money to be made with it now that Casinos and sports gambling are everywhere.
As a
byLocke2005 ( 849178 ) writes:
Tech rule #1: The first use of any new collaborative technology will be the distribution of dick pics. Every. Single. Time! Cat pics come second.
byfropenn ( 1116699 ) writes:
Haha, too true. Which is another good reason to not be an early adopter.
bygreytree ( 7124971 ) writes:
I can get that you might spend 100 million on a metaverse app. Go on, add a billion for, erm, marketing 'n shit, so people can try it out and you can see if they like it.
But to just plod away and spend SEVENTY BILLION ?!
byAn Ominous Cow Erred ( 28892 ) writes:
VRChat is everything Metaverse was trying to be, and is wildly successful. It succeeds because it is directly created through user demand, rather than a top down approach that considers users as a necessary evil at best, or a product to be actively sold at worse.
byLocke2005 ( 849178 ) writes:
In the Metaverse, users are the product, not the customer!
byLocke2005 ( 849178 ) writes:
Explain to me again why you renamed the company "Meta"... this should be HILARIOUS!
byakw0088 ( 7073305 ) writes:
This is what happens when everyone is drinking the same koolaid, not sure if their AI venture will suffer a similar fate, but I think most people at Meta are just happy to be there and aren't really motivated to do anything other than keep their jobs
There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
●
396 commentsMeta Says Llama 4 Targets Left-Leaning Bias
●
377 commentsAmericans' Junk-Filled Garages Are Hurting EV Adoption, Study Says
●
371 commentsMexico Threatens To Sue Google Over Gulf Renaming
●
363 commentsAmericans are Buying Twice as Many Hybrids as Fully Electric Vehicles. Is The Next Step Synthetic Fuels?
●
323 commentsEV Sales Keep Growing In the US, Represent 20% of Global Car Sales and Half in China
Signal Creator Marlinspike Wants To Do For AI What He Did For Messaging
Microsoft Pledges Full Power Costs, No Tax Breaks in Response To AI Data Center Backlash
Slashdot Top Deals
Slashdot
●
●
ofloaded
●
Submit Story
"Our reruns are better than theirs."
-- Nick at Nite
●FAQ
●Story Archive
●Hall of Fame
●Advertising
●Terms
●Privacy Statement
●About
●Feedback
●Mobile View
●Blog
Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
Copyright © 2026 Slashdot Media. All Rights Reserved.
×
Close
Working...
Microsoft Pledges Full Power Costs, No Tax Breaks in Response To AI Data Center Backlash
33comments
Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
Copyright © 2026 Slashdot Media. All Rights Reserved.
×
Close
Working...