Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 History  



1.1  Founder  





1.2  Development  







2 Beliefs  





3 Criticism  





4 See also  





5 Notes  





6 Bibliography  





7 External links  














Ash'arism: Difference between revisions






العربية
Azərbaycanca

Башҡортса
Català
Deutsch
Español
Esperanto
فارسی
Français
Հայերեն
ि
Bahasa Indonesia
Italiano
עברית
Қазақша

مصرى
Bahasa Melayu
Nederlands

Oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча
پښتو
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Shqip
Simple English
Soomaaliga
کوردی
Suomi
Svenska
ி
Тоҷикӣ
Türkçe
Українська
اردو
ئۇيغۇرچە / Uyghurche

 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




Print/export  







In other projects  



Wikimedia Commons
 
















Appearance
   

 





Help
 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Browse history interactively
 Previous editNext edit 
Content deleted Content added
Monkbot (talk | contribs)
3,119,769 edits
m Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 15 templates: del empty params (5×); hyphenate params (6×); del |ref=harv (3×);
→‎Beliefs: Requested clarification (ce)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Line 26: Line 26:

The Ashʿarite view holds that:

The Ashʿarite view holds that:

* [[God]] is all-powerful, therefore all Good and Evil is what God commands or forbids.<ref name="ReferenceA">John L. Esposito ''The Oxford History of Islam'' Oxford University Press 2000 {{ISBN|978-0-199-88041-6}} p. 281</ref> What God does or commands – as revealed in the [[Quran]] and [[hadith]] – is by definition just. What He prohibits is by definition unjust.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> Right and wrong are not objective realities.<ref name=brown-2014-53/>

* [[God]] is all-powerful, therefore all Good and Evil is what God commands or forbids.<ref name="ReferenceA">John L. Esposito ''The Oxford History of Islam'' Oxford University Press 2000 {{ISBN|978-0-199-88041-6}} p. 281</ref> What God does or commands – as revealed in the [[Quran]] and [[hadith]] – is by definition just. What He prohibits is by definition unjust.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> Right and wrong are not objective realities.<ref name=brown-2014-53/>

* Insisting as the opposing [[Muʿtazila]] did – that because God is just He cannot do/command something unjust (such as condemn someone to hell over something beyond their control) is an error because this limits His power. Some divine acts/commands might ''seem'' unfair/unjust to human beings, but ...{{clarify|reason=but what?!|date=September 2020}}<ref name=brown-2014-53>{{cite book|last1 = Brown|first1 = Jonathan A. C.|author-link = Jonathan A. C. Brown|title = Misquoting Muhammad: The Challenge and Choices of Interpreting the Prophet's Legacy|date = 2014|publisher = [[Oneworld Publications]]|isbn = 978-1780744209|url=https://archive.org/details/misquotingmuhamm0000brow/page/53|accessdate = 4 June 2018|ref = JACBMM2014|page = [https://archive.org/details/misquotingmuhamm0000brow/page/53 53]}}</ref>

* It is an error to insist–as did the opposing [[Muʿtazila]]–that, because God is just He cannot do/command something unjust (such as condemn someone to hell over something beyond their control), as this would limit His power. Some divine acts/commands might ''seem'' unfair/unjust to human beings, but ...{{clarify|reason=but what?!|date=September 2020}}<ref name=brown-2014-53>{{cite book|last1 = Brown|first1 = Jonathan A. C.|author-link = Jonathan A. C. Brown|title = Misquoting Muhammad: The Challenge and Choices of Interpreting the Prophet's Legacy|date = 2014|publisher = [[Oneworld Publications]]|isbn = 978-1780744209|url=https://archive.org/details/misquotingmuhamm0000brow/page/53|accessdate = 4 June 2018|ref = JACBMM2014|page = [https://archive.org/details/misquotingmuhamm0000brow/page/53 53]}}</ref>

* The unique nature and attributes of [[God in Islam|God]] cannot be understood fully by human reasoning and the senses.<ref name="ReferenceA"/>

* The unique nature and attributes of [[God in Islam|God]] cannot be understood fully by human reasoning and the senses.<ref name="ReferenceA"/>

* Reason is God-given and must be employed judge over source of knowledge.{{huh?|reason=poor grammar renders this sentence incomprehensible|date=September 2020}}{{sfn|Hughes|2013|pages=193-194}}

* Reason is God-given and must be employed judge over source of knowledge.{{huh?|reason=poor grammar renders this sentence incomprehensible|date=September 2020}}{{sfn|Hughes|2013|pages=193-194}}

Line 36: Line 36:

* The [[Quran]] is the uncreated word of God in essence; however, it is created when it takes on a form in letters or sound.<ref name=glasse-62-3>Cyril Glassé, Huston Smith ''The New Encyclopedia of Islam'' Rowman Altamira 2003 {{ISBN|978-0-759-10190-6}} page 62-3</ref>

* The [[Quran]] is the uncreated word of God in essence; however, it is created when it takes on a form in letters or sound.<ref name=glasse-62-3>Cyril Glassé, Huston Smith ''The New Encyclopedia of Islam'' Rowman Altamira 2003 {{ISBN|978-0-759-10190-6}} page 62-3</ref>

* Knowledge of God comes from studying the holy names and attributes in addition to studying the Quran and the Hadith of Muhammad.{{Citation needed|date=February 2018}}

* Knowledge of God comes from studying the holy names and attributes in addition to studying the Quran and the Hadith of Muhammad.{{Citation needed|date=February 2018}}

* Muslims must believe in the [[Five pillars of Islam]];<ref name=Saeed-chap-5>Abdullah Saeed ''Islamic Thought: An Introduction'' Routledge 2006 {{ISBN|978-1-134-22564-4}} chapter 5</ref>

* Muslims must believe

** in the [[Five pillars of Islam]];<ref name=Saeed-chap-5>Abdullah Saeed ''Islamic Thought: An Introduction'' Routledge 2006 {{ISBN|978-1-134-22564-4}} chapter 5</ref>

* in all the [[Prophets in Islam|Prophets of Islam]] from [[Adam in Islam|Adam]] to Muhammad;<ref name=Saeed-chap-5/>

** in all the [[Prophets in Islam|Prophets of Islam]] from [[Adam in Islam|Adam]] to Muhammad;<ref name=Saeed-chap-5/>

* and in [[Angels in Islam|angels]].<ref name=Saeed-chap-5/>

** and in [[Angels in Islam|angels]].<ref name=Saeed-chap-5/>



Ash'aris also have beliefs about Allah's attributes that are unique to them such as:<ref>{{Cite book|last=Al Numan ibn Thabit|first=Abu Hanifa|title=Al-Fiqh-Al-Akbar-An-Accurate-Translation|publisher=SunnahMuakada.com|pages=43–44}}</ref>

Ash'aris also have beliefs about Allah's attributes that are unique to them such as:<ref>{{Cite book|last=Al Numan ibn Thabit|first=Abu Hanifa|title=Al-Fiqh-Al-Akbar-An-Accurate-Translation|publisher=SunnahMuakada.com|pages=43–44}}</ref>


Revision as of 00:00, 7 December 2020

Ash'arismorAshʿari theology (/æʃəˈr/;[1] Arabic: أشعرية al-ʾAšʿarīyahorٱلْأَشَاعِرَة al-ʾAšāʿirah) is the foremost theological schoolofSunni Islam which established an orthodox dogmatic guideline[2] based on scriptural authority[citation needed], rationality,[3][4] and semi-rationalism,[3][5][6][7] founded by the Arab theologian Abu al-Hasan al-Ashʿari (d. 936 / AH 324).[8] The disciples of the school are known as Ashʿarites,[3] and the school is also referred to as the Ashʿarite school,[3] which became the dominant theological school within Sunni Islam.[9][10] It is considered one of the orthodox schools of theology in Sunni Islam,[11] alongside the Maturidi and Athari schools of theology.[12][13]

Amongst the most famous Ashʿarites are al-Ghazali, Izz al-Din ibn 'Abd al-Salam, al-Suyuti, Ibn 'Asakir, and al-Subki.[14]

History

Founder

Abu al-Hasan al-Ashʿari was noted for his teachings on atomism,[15] among the earliest Islamic philosophies, and for al-Ashʿari this was the basis for propagating the view that God created every moment in time and every particle of matter. He nonetheless believed in free will, elaborating the thoughts of Dirar ibn 'Amr and Abu Hanifa into a "dual agent" or "acquisition" (iktisab) account of free will.[16][page needed]

While al-Ashʿari opposed the views of the rival Mu'tazili school, he was also opposed to the view which rejected all debate, held by certain schools such as the Zahiri ("literalist"), Mujassimite ("anthropotheist") and Muhaddithin ("traditionalist") schools for their over-emphasis on taqlid (imitation) in his Istihsan al‑Khaud:[17]

A section of the people (i.e., the Zahirites and others) made capital out of their own ignorance; discussions and rational thinking about matters of faith became a heavy burden for them, and, therefore, they became inclined to blind faith and blind following (taqlid). They condemned those who tried to rationalize the principles of religion as 'innovators'. They considered discussion about motion, rest, body, accident, colour, space, atom, the leaping of atoms, and Attributes of God, to be an innovation and a sin. They said that had such discussions been the right thing, the Prophet and his Companions would have definitely done so; they further pointed out that the Prophet, before his death, discussed and fully explained all those matters which were necessary from the religious point of view, leaving none of them to be discussed by his followers; and since he did not discuss the problems mentioned above, it was evident that to discuss them must be regarded as an innovation.

Development

Ashʿarism became the main school of early Islamic philosophy whereby it was originally based on the foundations laid down by Abu al-Hasan al-Ashʿari who founded the school in the 10th century based on the methodology taught to him by his teacher Abdullah ibn Sa'eed ibn Kullaab. However, the school underwent many changes throughout history resulting in the term Ashʿari, in modern usage, being extremely broad, e.g. differences between Ibn Furak (d. AH 406) and al-Bayhaqi (d. AH 384).[18][19]

For example, the Asharite view was that comprehension of the unique nature and characteristics of God were beyond human capability. The solution proposed by Abu al-Hasan al-Ashʿari to solve the problems of tashbih and ta'til concedes that the Divine Being possesses in a real sense the attributes and Names mentioned in the Quran. Insofar as these names and attributes have a positive reality, they are distinct from the essence, but nevertheless they do not have either existence or reality apart from it. The inspiration of al-Ashʿari in this matter was on the one hand to distinguish essence and attribute as concepts, and on the other hand to see that the duality between essence and attribute should be situated not on the quantitative but on the qualitative level — something which Mu'tazili thinking had failed to grasp.[20]

Ash'aris were referred to as the muthbita (those who make firm) by the Mutazilites.[21]

Beliefs

The Ashʿarite view holds that:

Ash'aris also have beliefs about Allah's attributes that are unique to them such as:[28]

Criticism

Ibn Taymiyyah criticised Ashari thought as (in the words of one historian, Jonathan A. C. Brown) "a Greek solution to Greek problems" that should "never" have concerned Muslims.[29] Both Shah Wali Allah and Ibn Taymiyyah rejected the lack of literalism in Ashʿari "speculative theology" and advocated "straightforward acceptance of God's description of Himself".[30]

German scholar Eduard Sachau says the theology of Ashʿari and its biggest defender, al-Ghazali, was responsible for the decline of Islamic science starting in the tenth century, and stated that the two clerics were the only obstacle to the Muslim world becoming a nation of "Galileos, Keplers and Newtons".[31] Joseph E. B. Lumbard offered a different view, claiming that there is no historical evidence to substantiate such a claim, and that science continued to prosper. He asserts that this viewpoint originates from a poor reading of Ghazali warning against the abuse of new technology and how it can disrupt and harm society if not properly implemented, similar to how nuclear weapons, artificial intelligence and stem cell research today are restricted to a degree for ethical reasons.[32]

Ziauddin Sardar says that some of the greatest Muslim scientists, such as Ibn al-Haytham and Abū Rayhān al-Bīrūnī, who were pioneers of the scientific method, were themselves followers of the Ashʿari school of Islamic theology.[33] Like other Ashʿarites who believed that faith or taqlid should apply only to Islam and not to any ancient Hellenistic authorities,[34] Ibn al-Haytham's view that taqlid should apply only to prophets of Islam and not to any other authorities formed the basis for much of his scientific skepticism and criticism against Ptolemy and other ancient authorities in his Doubts Concerning Ptolemy and Book of Optics.[35]

Some authors have questioned the spiritual value of discussion methods employed by the Ashʿarites and other dialectical theologians. Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, himself a leading figure of the Ashʿari school, said at the end of his life: "I employed all the methods which philosophy and dialectic had provided, but in the end I realised that these methods neither could bring solace to the weary heart nor quench the thirst of the thirsty. The best method and the nearest one to reality was the method provided by the Qur'an."[36][self-published source]

See also

Notes

  • ^ Cyril Glassé, Huston Smith The New Encyclopedia of Islam Rowman Altamira 2003 ISBN 978-0-759-10190-6 page 63
  • ^ a b c d Halverson 2010, pp. 14–15.
  • ^ Weeks, Douglas. "The Ideology of Al Muhajiroun." Al Muhajiroun. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2020. 103-140.
  • ^ Gyekye, Kwame. "Theology and Law in Islam." (1976): 304-306.
  • ^ Fah̲rī, Mağīd. Ethical theories in Islam. Vol. 8. Brill, 1991.
  • ^ Hashas, Mohammed. "Is European Islam Experiencing an Ontological Revolution for an Epistemological Awakening?." American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 31: 4 (2014): 14.
  • ^ Tabyin Kadhib al-Muftari fima Nussiba ila al-Imam al-Ash`ari (Ibn 'Asakir)
  • ^ a b c d Abdullah Saeed Islamic Thought: An Introduction Routledge 2006 ISBN 978-1-134-22564-4 chapter 5
  • ^ Juan Eduardo Campo Encyclopedia of Islam New York, NY 2009 ISBN 978-1-438-12696-8 page 66
  • ^ Pall, Zoltan (31 January 2013). Lebanese Salafis Between the Gulf and Europe. Amsterdam University Press. p. 18. ISBN 9789089644510. Retrieved 12 July 2016.
  • ^ Halverson 2010, p. 9.
  • ^ a b c Hughes 2013, pp. 193–194.
  • ^ Hamad al-Sanan, Fawziy al-'Anjariy, Ahl al-Sunnah al-Asha'irah, pp.248-258. Dar al-Diya'.
  • ^ Ash'ari - A History of Muslim Philosophy
  • ^ Watt, Montgomery. Free-Will and Predestination in Early Islam. Luzac & Co.: London 1948.
  • ^ M. Abdul Hye, Ph.D, Ash’arism, Philosophia Islamica.
  • ^ "Imam Bayhaqi".
  • ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2013-02-16. Retrieved 2013-02-13.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  • ^ Corbin (1993), pp. 115 and 116
  • ^ "Fatawa - Who are the Ash'arites?". Dar al-Ifta al Misriyyah. Retrieved 2020-10-14.
  • ^ a b c John L. Esposito The Oxford History of Islam Oxford University Press 2000 ISBN 978-0-199-88041-6 p. 281
  • ^ a b Brown, Jonathan A. C. (2014). Misquoting Muhammad: The Challenge and Choices of Interpreting the Prophet's Legacy. Oneworld Publications. p. 53. ISBN 978-1780744209. Retrieved 4 June 2018.
  • ^ Alexander Knysh Islam in Historical Perspective Taylor & Francis 2016 ISBN 978-1-317-27339-4 page 163
  • ^ Ron Geaves Islam Today: An Introduction A&C Black 2010 ISBN 978-1-847-06478-3 page 21
  • ^ Ian Richard Netton Encyclopaedia of Islam Routledge 2013 ISBN 978-1-135-17960-1 page 183
  • ^ a b Cyril Glassé, Huston Smith The New Encyclopedia of Islam Rowman Altamira 2003 ISBN 978-0-759-10190-6 page 62-3
  • ^ Al Numan ibn Thabit, Abu Hanifa. Al-Fiqh-Al-Akbar-An-Accurate-Translation. SunnahMuakada.com. pp. 43–44.
  • ^ Brown, Jonathan A. C. (2014). Misquoting Muhammad: The Challenge and Choices of Interpreting the Prophet's Legacy. Oneworld Publications. p. 62. ISBN 978-1780744209. Retrieved 4 June 2018.
  • ^ Brown, Jonathan A. C. (2014). Misquoting Muhammad: The Challenge and Choices of Interpreting the Prophet's Legacy. Oneworld Publications. p. 65. ISBN 978-1780744209. Retrieved 4 June 2018.
  • ^ Muzaffar Iqbal, Science and Islam, p. 120. From the Greenwood Guides to Science and Religion Series. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group, 2007. ISBN 9780313335761
  • ^ Lumbard, Joseph. "Neil deGrasse Tyson, Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī, and the Decline of Science in the Islamic World". Retrieved 25 October 2019.
  • ^ Sardar, Ziauddin (1998), "Science in Islamic philosophy", Islamic Philosophy, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, retrieved 2008-02-03
  • ^ Anwar, Sabieh (October 2008), "Is Ghazālī really the Halagu of Science in Islam?", Monthly Renaissance, 18 (10), retrieved 2008-10-14
  • ^ Rashed, Roshdi (2007), "The Celestial Kinematics of Ibn al-Haytham", Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 17 (1), Cambridge University Press: 7–55 [11], doi:10.1017/S0957423907000355
  • ^ Rashid Ahmad Jullundhry, Quranic Exegesis in Classical Literature, pp. 53–54. Islamic Book Trust/The Other Press, 2010. ISBN 9789675062551
  • Bibliography

    External links


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ash%27arism&oldid=992766048"

    Categories: 
    Ash'ari
    Asharis
    Sunni Islamic branches
    Kalam
    Islamic theology
    Islamic philosophical schools
    History of Islam
    Hidden categories: 
    CS1 maint: archived copy as title
    Articles with short description
    Short description is different from Wikidata
    Articles needing translation from Arabic Wikipedia
    Articles containing Arabic-language text
    All articles with unsourced statements
    Articles with unsourced statements from September 2020
    Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from April 2016
    Wikipedia articles needing clarification from September 2020
    Articles with unsourced statements from February 2018
    All accuracy disputes
    Accuracy disputes from July 2020
     



    This page was last edited on 7 December 2020, at 00:00 (UTC).

    This version of the page has been revised. Besides normal editing, the reason for revision may have been that this version contains factual inaccuracies, vandalism, or material not compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki