Contents

User talk:Voceditenore

“

If you leave a message here, I'll answer it here. If I left a message on your talk page, please reply there. I'll watch your page and reply as soon as I can.

”

• AfD • Proposed deletion • Speedy deletion • Blacklist (requests) • User warnings • Cleanup templates

• Ralph Lyford and Castle Agrazant (ejly)

• [[File:SMirC-smile.svg|25 px]] [[File:SMirC-sad.svg|20px]]
• [[File:Nuvola apps important yellow.svg|50 px]]

• The answer to life, the universe, and everything

• {{PD-art-100}}

• {{link-interwiki|en=Auguste Vianesi|lang=it|lang_title=Pellegrini - Vianesi}}

• {{AFC submission|d|v|declinets=yyyymmdd|decliner=name of decliner|ts=20120910121121|u=name of creator|ns=5}}

• {{WP:Teahouse/Teahouse_talkback|WP:Teahouse/Questions|question title goes here|ts=~~~~}}
• {{lang|it|}} ISO 639-1

• Copyright advice from MRG

Oi, you haven't put your email into your preferences!

Only reason I noticed is that I usually ask this privately, but anyway...fancy a shot at RFA? I would be happy to nominate you. Best, Moreschi (talk) (debate) 22:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Oi, Moreschi, I've sent you an email so you'll have my address if you ever need it. Thanks for the offer and your confidence. But... admin-ing would take too much time away from what I really enjoy – writing articles, rescuing worthy kittens from being drowned at AfDs, and helping out on the Opera Project. The latter can provide quite enough wiki-drama as it is. ;-). Best, Voceditenore (talk) 08:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also [1]. Voceditenore (talk) 10:26, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

...to read this brilliant piece. And I wasn't even looking for it; I came here to thank you for backing me up on the GA issue on Egardus, since that's something that's been bugging me for a while and had to get off my chest. But your essay was spot-on. Oops, there I go again, pretending to be an adult! Need to get a bouncier, animated signature ... Antandrus (talk) 23:02, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll make you one if you promise to give me three barnstars. ;-) Seriously, though thanks for the kind review. I wrote that when WP was in the midst of an invasion by a particularly... er... time-consuming... bunch of 13 year olds. At one point there was even a WikiProject (now deleted) that was awarding them barnstars for every 1000 edits, every 50 AfD's "voted on", every 5 (hapless) editors they adopted, etc., etc.. For a while, I and a couple of other editors spent all our time running around cleaning up after them, until they lost interest and/or got blocked. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 07:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Voceditenore. Thanks for the beautiful rewrite on John Andrew Rea. I would prefer not having to delete noteworthy articles, but the current backlog at copyright violations leaves me little time to revise much text. (Especially in Moonriddengirl's absence.) I just wanted you to know that I very much appreciate your contributions. Cheers. — CactusWriter | ^needles 06:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome ;-) and you were absolutely right to delete it. If you have time, could you do me a favour? I've re-written Juliette PochinonTalk:Juliette Pochin/Temp. Would it possible to move it into article space. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 07:33, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Another nice job -- and better still was your discussion with the original creator on the talk page. "...Teach a man to fish..." etc. You're a good teacher. Cheers. — CactusWriter | ^needles 16:13, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! In my university teaching days, I once had a student who plagiarsed my own book in her essay. But at least it took some effort, bless her. She typed it out from the hardcopy — must have taken ages. Re "teaching how to fish...", I'm not sure how many new fishermen it produces for Wikipedia. In the Opera Project we get a lot of articles for singers, opera companies, etc. created by their agents and PR people, and sometimes themselves. In my experience, the best I can hope for is that they'll edit their article according to the guidelines in future. I have yet to find one who has ever contributed anything else to Wikipedia. Their only interest in the project is as a PR tool. Having said that, at least it results (after much red-pencilling from other editors) in one new article on a notable subject that we didn't have before. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 10:05, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for teaching me also, about every singer to opera and avoiding answers.com! I keep supplying singers to the project who never sing opera, last Dorothee Mields. When I found a Bach singer who also sang opera I nominated that fact for DYK, Franz Kelch, to be 95 this year, no PR involved. Unfortunately the only source for him I found in English reads like a machine translation. Any help in that case? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:50, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My god, plagiarizing the prof's own book -- that's sadly funny -- the very definition of clueless. I would suggest she switch majors. I know what you mean about bulk of submissions coming from PR types. (It's one of the reasons I refrain from offering copyright violators much opportunity to license the source website -- the promotional text couldn't be used anyway.) But, occasionally, unexpectedly, when the stars align just so... you'll come across a true angler among the crowd of daytrippers. When is that next blue moon anyway? — CactusWriter | ^needles 19:03, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Voceditenore. Would you please check my user talk page? Some time ago you were assisting me in the creation of a new page, ".Gabriel". As you requested, I posted my request on that page but haven't heard from you. I understand you are very busy but would really appreciate your help. Thank you!TF537 (talk) 21:35, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see edit request. In the meantime, you can use put the alt in the image parameter. e.g. |image=[[File:example.png|200px|alt=Example alt text]] Racepacket (talk) 21:55, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Image_alt parameter has been added to {{Infobox play}} Racepacket (talk) 22:16, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Great! Thanks so much! I'll add it to La Tosca. I used your "get-around" for the book infobox at I Love Bacon!. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 18:06, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would question why the BBC are allowed to vandalise the page and put blatant propaganda on there suggesting that the response to the programme was mixed in some way, when in fact it was universally appalling. Every time real and referenced reviews are put up, they are taken down by some BBC apparatchik dickhead. Why are they not censored? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.176.103 (talk) 18:06, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This has nothing to do with "real and referenced reviews" being taken down. You deliberately inserted false and in several cases defamatory content about living people in multiple articles related to this show, as well adding as your personal commentary disguised to make it look as if it were a quote referenced from a reliable source, e.g. [2], [3], [4], [5]. You are going to get your IP, aka Oxford University, blocked if you keep it up. Voceditenore (talk) 18:50, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tim just did a nice job expanding the Victorian burlesque article. Does anything need to be added back and forth between this and the Travesti article that you are working on? Just a thought. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of the current merge proposal at Burlesque (literature)? I wonder if merging it into the poorly-written Burlesque article will destroy any value (or chance at expansion) that it may have. Your comments would be valued at Talk:Burlesque. -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:31, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, V. You may find this article of interest: http://www.jstor.org/pss/3826405 -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:20, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Steve. I'm going to file this away for when I next add to Travesti. I've still got a bit to do re the ballet sections. But I never seem to get the time. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 14:10, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for re-establishing this article. During copy-edit driving I found the previous version a complete copy-and-paste violation from inception; I was the one who tagged for deletion. I have to say your succinct but elegant stub is superb, and should be set as an example of “how to do it”’. I have a tendency to reduce faulty articles to the brusque and barren, so I will log your Keto and Kote as a guiding light. In admiration. Acabashi (talk) 03:24, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe :) Moreschi (talk) 17:38, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Above comment is in response to this. Voceditenore (talk) 14:08, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for watching the dead links. It's a big shame that the PeoplePlayUK site went down, as it had a huge amount of info for Victorian articles. I think that most of the content migrated somewhere, but I'm not sure where. Any idea? All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:03, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the only dead link was PeoplePlayUK. The other 2 were spam/copyvio. Anyhow, the Theatre Museum's contents are now held by the Victoria & Albert. See the V & A's Theatre and Performance collections page. If you search the V & A collections, the online objects generally come with a lot of informative text in addition to the image. See this, for example. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 11:40, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have finished my work on this. The peer review threw up some interesting suggestions, many of which have been absorbed into the article. It is now at FAC (please take a look), and I am working on improving and extending the discography subarticle. I have not done anything with the "adaptations" which were removed from the older version of the article, and it may be a while before I can get to deciding what should be done here. Brianboulton (talk) 18:16, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on getting it to FA, Brian! I'm going to be away for the next 2 weeks and wouldn't be able to help with an "adaptations" page anyway. One of the advantages of page like that is to keep all sorts of minor (and often very trivial) distractions out of the main article. A popular work like this is particularly prone to that kind of stuff, often added "drive-by" without references or context. But let's see how it goes. There may not be a need for an "adaptations", at least in the near future. By the way, can you get the Carmen Filmography link to work? I can't and have tried multiple times. :/ Best, Voceditenore (talk) 15:21, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will continue improving the discography article as time permits. In due course I'll open a rudimentary "adaptations" article for the purpose you describe; it won't be long before the trivia merchants start tampering with the main article. It went through the FAC process so smoothly and swiftly that I can't help an uneasy feeling that something important got missed. Brianboulton (talk) 15:38, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Voceditenore! The Smithsonian Institution Archives took notice of your finding about Clara Hasse's death date and will be updating their records, website and Flickr! The changes should take place tomorrow. So thanks for the great find! Sarah (talk) 14:23, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. It's nice to see that the traffic between Wikipedia and its sources goes both ways. Last year I got the Encyclopedic Discography of Victor RecordingsatUCSB to change a glaring error on their database which found while I was researching Stanislao Gastaldon. In the process, I discovered another and even more whopping error in New Grove Dictionary of Opera which had been propagated all over the internet, but that's Grove's problem. OK, now I'm off to give the Harvard library system a nudge over this. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 08:32, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies if this is in the wrong place (finding out how to contribute to Wikipedia is a very steep learning curve and I've only just learnt Joomla, brain hurting!). Huge thanks for the rewriting and reformatting of the article on Dove's Tobias and the Angel. I'd only just discovered it was there and found it was so incomplete and inaccurate it needed some serious input. Having been in the project from the very beginning I felt I had the authority to write on it, and did post some material from my website - hadn't realised this seems to count as conflict of interest. But it certainly doesn't violate copyright which presumably belongs to me, and I'd like to be able to insert a photo of the Birmingham production, would this be allowed? I'd be very grateful if you had time to help me on this. Kate Quartano Brown (talk) 15:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A while back I did some work de-fluffing Richard Gombrich. I think it still needs some more, but I have a little learning to the most dangerous degree and can't really see the wood for the trees. I'm pretty sure the structure is still hagiographic. May I ask if you could do a quick brisk hacking back of the undergrowth? Am pretty sure that the list of publications goes way beyond the notable, too. Amuse yourself by reading how it looked five years ago almost-instinct 12:07, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm grateful for your clear explanation and kind welcome on my first interaction with Wikipedia. The format here is slightly intimidating and I'm wary of breaking taboos or upsetting anyone so your breakdown and reassurance was greatly appreciated. :-)

SonnySonnyWilliamson (talk) 11:27, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK gong archived here. Voceditenore (talk) 09:35, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to say, nice job on the Giovanna Gray article. Going to the old, foreign language sources is something not everyone can do, and it makes a big difference. David.thompson.esq (talk) 13:01, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, David. I had a lot fun writing that. Most of the articles I write tend to be of this type, e.g., Cristina, regina di Svezia, Mala Pasqua!, Stanislao Gastaldon, Andrea Salvadori, Eugenia Tadolini. I figure that for the really famous composers, operas, singers, etc. there are plenty of online sources, but for these, the only place people will be able to find detailed information, in English, and free of charge is Wikipedia. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 10:07, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/ggb2004008982/resource/

What do you think of this image, which also covers an opera singer without photo? Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 21:47, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK, but I'd never use it for Lillian Grenville. The one of her alone will be much better for that article. It's also a much more arresting image than this rather stilted duo. But this one would be good for Gustave Huberdeau and Natoma (kills 2 birds with one stone for that article). Voceditenore (talk) 17:57, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some more possibilities for articles and future articles with no images:

• http://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/ggbain.00006/ for Eleonora de Cisneros

• http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/ggb2004000007/ Josephine Jacoby (Met contralto)

The Bain collection is very badly annotated, I'm just plowing slowly through all the images and clicking on ones that likely to be opera singers. I may find some more...

Best, Voceditenore (talk) 18:11, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any idea which Stephano the Jacoby is? Niklausse is almost certainly Tales of Hoffmann, but I'm not sure off-hand about a Stephano trousers role. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 19:10, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I assume Roméo et Juliette she sang it many times at the Met at around the time that picture was taken [6], and her career was almost entirely at the Met. Voceditenore (talk) 19:20, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thought that would've been too high for her, since Wikipedia labels it as a soprano part. If she sang it, though, it's probably that. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 19:58, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Met lists her as a mezzo-soprano (rather than contralto), and the role is frequently sung and recorded by mezzos, e.g. Kristine Jepson, Susan Graham, etc. Voceditenore (talk) 10:18, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some time ago, you started the article on Rosine Stoltz. There is now a discussion about the date of her death. I wonder if you could consult your original sources and let us know. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:58, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at Talk:Rosine Stoltz. Voceditenore (talk) 13:32, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A most pleasing new article. I'll add the church to my itinerary for a vaguely-planned, Fauré-themed wander round Paris. Don't bother to reply to this: I just wanted to express my appreciation. – Tim riley (talk) 19:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Voce. I hope this finds you well. Our paths once again cross in Mario Di Fiorino, and I notice your work in Gruppo del Rosario. There is a connection between Bridging Eastern & Western Psychiatry, the closely connected, newly created bios Maria Luisa Figueira and Mario Di Fiorino, as well as edits made by the same users in e.g. Davide Lazzeretti, Leonetto Amadei, Ganser syndrome, and Mind control. I reverted in Leonetto Amadei, and left a note on the editor's page, and subsequently tried to add info from the .it article Leonetto Amadei. (It appears that the Italian Leonette Amadei has had additions similar to the ones made to the English.) The English version has had the same material re-added. I restored an older version of Davide Lazzeretti. I have raised attention about this pattern (WP:COATRACK?) on WikiProject Medicine and WikiProject Psycholog, alas, not to much avail. Maybe it is something you would like to look into? Best, Sam Sailor ^Sing 21:05, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HiSam, hmmm, yes, I've noticed this interesting little can of worms. On the Italian WP, some of their stuff has been deleted outright, e.g. Mario di Fiorino, Bridging Eastern & Western Psychiatry and Psichiatria e Territorio (also founded by Di Fiorino) or reverted in existing articles, e.g. Leonetto Amadei, Davide Lazzeretti. Often, however, a "new" editor pops up to re-add the stuff, as happens here. The editors also use the same arguments they use here: "It's in the Italian/English Wikipedia so it's ok".

Several of the SPAs active here have been blocked for sockpuppetry at the Italian WP [7], [8], [9]. I'm not sure if they're sock or meat puppets, but without getting into outing, Google searches on their user names reveal that all are from the Pisa/Forte dei Marmi/Viareggio area. A couple are students of Di Fiorino or his colleagues, one works for a hotel in Forte dei Marmi and helps organize functions for Di Fiorino's symposia, two have co-authored articles with Di Fiorino, one appears to be Di Fiorino himself, etc. etc. I would say that just about every red-linked contributor since August to the articles you've cited is in some way connected to Di Fiorino and all their contributions here need checking. Some of them have extensively edited psychology/psychiatry articles in addition to the ones you've mentioned. Note also this sandbox. There's obviously more to come.

Anyhow, here's my take on some of the articles:

• Maria Luisa Figueira passes, seems reasonably notable.
• Mario Di Fiorino probably just scrapes but I'm going to wield the red pencil extensively there.
• I'm going to stub Bridging Eastern & Western Psychiatry and probably redirect it later to Di Fiorino
• Suggest we keep a watch on Leonetto Amadei, clearly being used as a coatrack and needs excising and building up. He's definitely notable.
• Ditto Davide Lazzeretti.

If we meet resistance from the "consortium" of Tuscan editors, then we take 'em to WP:COI/N. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 22:24, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beautiful to see the logic you apply when investigating, I learned a lot. Thanks! Best, Sam Sailor ^Sing 00:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Want me to do {{cite books}} in the Publications section of Mario Di Fiorino? Best, Sam Sailor ^Sing 09:36, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the edit dated 20th Feb, and it was essentially the same as the Amazon review, so no copyright infringement. I'm unconvinced that it is ready for submission yet, given the generally hagiographic tone, eg She is the latest of her family to achieve international renown. followed by sections of her family's achievement (notability is not inheritable, so no real point to this), Miss Schartz instead of just the surname, "Career highlights" rather than "Career". Shall I recreate in Lisaby's sandbox? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:28, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jim, I answered over at the AfC Help Desk where I suggested moving to User:Lisaby/Sylvia Schwartz (a previous redirect to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sylvia Schwartz). It sounds like it needs a good going over for style and tone as well as referencing and I'll try to help the editor with it before they submit it again. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 10:23, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the Caldara opera, here's another: La concordia de' pianeti [10], --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:25, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HiGerda. You're welcome :). I've added quite a bit more to it now. Apparently, Tito e Berenice was part of contest! I might do La concordia once the German performance actually takes place. In the meantime, I'll be working on creating the other two Operas of the Month, by papa Scarlatti and his son. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 19:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. After I closed my shop completely (see my talk, - I kept the ironing lady) I suddenly feel very busy with a man whose boss is the pope and a painter stub, not mentioning the GA nom for Chéreau. Did you see that I mention singing as occupation in my own (bzzt, unspeakable)? (Derived from "Singen, singen" in the Christmas Story by Schütz). In choir, we will concentrate on Schütz and Rutter, Magnificat by both, I hope I will get in the mood until July / October / November. Certainly not if we keep losing a great editor every week, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:31, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is it safe to come back....? almost-instinct 15:48, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yep :) Great to see you, A-I! I miss those happy hours we spent de-pufferizing articles. I had to whack this one all by myself. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 15:56, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mmmm maybe not so safe after all.... almost-instinct 13:43, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, you mean below? I think you'll be OK . I only mention it if I'm specifically asked. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 07:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's not you I'm worried about ;) almost-instinct 11:19, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi voceditenore. I just read some interesting articles on this lady and thought you might enjoy penning an article on her. Here are some potential sources:

• http://www.nycommunitytrust.org/Portals/0/Uploads/Documents/BioBrochures/Mme.%20Anna%20E.%20Schoen-Rene.pdf
• http://books.google.com/books?id=oLAMtq6dtFkC&pg=PA21&dq=%27von+schoen%27+%22agriculture%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=qU8NU6W3OaLiyAG2koCoCw&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q='von%20schoen'%20%22agriculture%22&f=false
• http://collections.mnhs.org/MNHistoryMagazine/articles/48/v48i08p332-338.pdf

Best wishes.4meter4 (talk) 02:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! She sounds like quite a character, 4meter4. I'm sort of up to my eyeballs at the moment, but I'll keep this here to remind me to get 'round to it eventually, if someone else doesn't first. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 17:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recent cleanup/removing promotional/un-encyclopedic information from Sharon Ruchman. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:27, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HiDavid. I'm away until the end of April, but I'm rather minded to PROD it or take it to AfD. But I'll need to do a little research first. I had a look at the talk page of the reviewer who had accepted it. Dear Oh Dear. :) Best, Voceditenore (talk) 17:05, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've created a new article, except that this time I've achieved as much in four days as I did in six weeks. Also, I have chosen a subject for which it is much easier to prove notability. When I created the page it seemed to go immediately into article space, so I'm hoping to avoid the AfC route. Would you have time to review Northern Lights (song), please, and give me the benefit of your opinion on it? Hopefully, there aren't any silly mistakes like disambiguations this time. In particular, could you check the way I am loading the images, please? Do I need to do more to create a fair use rationale? Thankyou. CaesarsPalaceDude (talk) 14:11, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks. Some of the articles on Gluck's major operas need more work, but I'm probably not going to touch them until next year. I thought I'd produce a bunch of stubs on the Baroque and minor Classical works then add to them bit by bit. I noticed you discovered the Gluck Gesamtausgabe online, a very useful find. Some of the information is very interesting. For example, I don't think there can be many operas where the entire cast was made up of archduchesses and the work was conducted by a future emperor.

BTW I think La danza (Gluck) is beyond start-class, at least C. There's not much you can really say about an opera Julian Rushton dismisses as "a slight work". The Penguin Guide to Opera on CD doesn't even bother trying to give synopsis, saying there is "no plot or development whatsoever." Having read the libretto, I can sympathise with that! Cheers.--Folantin (talk) 10:32, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I have made some further inputs to the said Article on Leela Bordia. Please have a look at it and give me your suggestions on whether i am on the right path and plz guide regarding corrections if any, since i am just a beginner.

Regards

The iWriter ```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by The iWriter (talk • contribs) 12:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The iWriter. I assume you mean the draft User:The iWriter/sandbox? I'll have a look at it later today or tomorrow. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 13:06, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Voceditenore

Yes plz and thanks

```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by The iWriter (talk • contribs) 13:09, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced this article should even exist. It starts with a statement about the commission's function which only mentions part of its role, it's got a minor controversy that doesn't seem to belong, it lists too many officers, and doesn't even show notability. I guess we could stub it. Any suggetions? Dougweller (talk) 11:38, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HiDoug. I was just concerned to get the copyvio out. But I agree with you about the article. Its notability is pretty marginal. I think stubbing for now to the bare facts, and removing all the names apart would be the way to go. Ditto the image of the chairman. I may have to open a CCI for the creator, User:Donyi Taga, if they've created any more articles. See also this incident yesterday involving one of his socks. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 12:08, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. And rev/deleted the copyvio. Dougweller (talk) 16:34, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Really, you're too good to us!

Thank you, dear VdiT, for your kind offer of assistance. We accept. Going online tonight, hoping to solicit your counsel, I had no idea that you'd have beat me to the punch! My students and I appreciate your interest and your help. Happy autumn! Yours, Ijmusic (talk) 22:23, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up

Thanks, VdiT, for your heads-up. Computer issues kept me signed out, and I only saw your message today. I'm passing it along. Hope you're well. Yours, Ijmusic (talk) 02:24, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for visiting our pages

Dear VdiT, Thanks for visiting the pages of both the Longy and Berklee classes. The students and I appreciated the care and concern that you have already shown us this autumn. Hoping you're well, Yours, Ijmusic (talk) 02:57, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Hello Voceditenore,

I hope I am using your talk page correctly-- I am just getting started and this is the first post I am writing on wikipedia. Thank you for your warm welcome to the community and the resources you've sent my way. I really appreciate it and may be in touch to ask questions!

Best, Keacord (talk) 23:16, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HiKeacord! You did fine. Ask away, whenever you need to. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 07:38, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Any Ideas?

Hello! Thank you for all you do. I need to write an article based around classical music. Something, someone, somewhere, some time, that needs a wiki article. Any ideas? Snaudrey (talk) 03:08, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HiSnaudrey! I've moved your message here to the bottom of the page—the wiki way. :-) Will visit your talk page later today with some ideas. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 07:38, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Any ideas?

Hello! thank you for all you do! I need to write a wiki article which revolves around classical music. Someone, something, somewhere, or some time, that needs a page. Any ideas? Snaudrey (talk) 06:11, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

great list!

thank you so much for that list. I had an idea going through it, and I wanted to run it past you and see what you think. What if I did my article on you. Not specifically who you are, but what you do, since when, why, maybe a bit of background, you deserve a page! what do you think? Snaudrey (talk) 07:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes, Snaudrey! I'm not even a notable Wikipedian, let alone a notable person in real life. So no, that is totally not feasible . Have you thought about doing a biography of Georges Longy? I think it's awful that his name is still red-linked. I'll leave you some sources on your talk page in case you're interested in pursuing that. If not, you can share them with any of your classmates who might be interested. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 12:36, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

okay, okay

Alright, I see what you are saying. it was just a fleeting idea of a moment, although I will say you are way too modest. As for your suggestion about Longy, my colleague is already in the process of making his page, so it is getting done. I will send him the information you sent me. And thank you so much for the list, I am slowly chipping away to see what I will choose to fill a gap. How fun is this! Snaudrey (talk) 06:32, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for your help--I was trying desperately to figure out how to add categories! Suddenly, they appeared, and I checked the edit history and confirmed my suspicions you had swooped in. Anyway, I gave it my best shot for now. Have a good day or night, wherever you are! Keacord (talk) 05:32, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from your Longy fans

Dear VdiT, When we went over our pages in class this morning, we had the impression that you'd lavished an immense amount of time, attention, and care on our work. Thank you very much. And, as we're all saying over here this week, Happy Thanksgiving! Yours,Ijmusic (talk) 17:11, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

help with article

Hello! A thousand apologies for posting my article twice, not completely sure how that happened. I am here to ask for your help on what I can do to remedy the violations on my article on Joaquin Turina. I have some ideas on how to fix it;

• I can go through and put quotations around the copied text. I know the information is sound because the website it comes from has an extensive and well cited bibliography.
• I can go through and paraphrase the text, writing my own version of the information.

What do you think? Any other suggestions? I will do whatever I have to do to successfully post my article. Class was wonderful today going through everyone's articles. Thank you for the guidance! What an adventure! Snaudrey (talk) 17:15, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HiSnaudrey! I've left some preliminary guidance on your talk page. More tomorrow. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 19:49, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Hi! Thank you for correcting my article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ting Ying (talk • contribs) 03:51, 2 December 2014 (UTC) Oh!! I forgot to sign my posts...I am sorry about that! Thanks again!!!Ting Ying (talk) 04:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome, Ting Ying . Best, Voceditenore (talk) 19:47, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What's going on?

Hello. We talked a while ago about my creating an article for Tom Alonso's Phantom of the Opera. You emphasized the importance of finding published sources and I have done everything I can to do so. There is now only one section in the article without reputable references and it is the same length as one section of another student's article, which is already published and presumably fine. My article is now at Draft:Phantom of the Opera (1992 musical)... and it's been completely static since a week ago. Is this normal for an AfC article? Is there any way I can get it published any sooner, or possibly get some feedback before publication? Thanks --Miriam.Ela.Malt (talk) 16:41, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Miriam. Sorry my reply is a bit late late. I've been in the US for Thanksgiving and only got back to London yesterday. I'll have a close look at your draft tomorrow morning, give you some feedback, and explain your options. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 19:46, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Voceditenore!

I'm a student of the vision of music's future class by Ijmusic. I apologize for my late answer about your greetings. I want to make a new article about the album titled "People Time: The Complete Recordings and I want you to recommend me your any ideas. I have a sandbox and I put some of the information to sandbox. I will appreciate if you take a look at my sand box and give me any comments. In my own opinion, I have two questions. First is I want to shorten the space during all of the song titles. If I put one enter, It doesn't have one line down, but indicated on the same line. So after I put enter twice the next song title goes down but it have too broad space I think. Do you know how can I make a narrow and nice line change? And the other question is, like any other album articles, I want to make a project album banner that contains information about album. So I join to WikiProject Albums member, and tried to put the banner with my own information but it showed an odd banner instead of clear album information. Do you know how can I put the edit correctly? Thanks again your kindness and I will wait your answer. Myeonghanyu (talk) 15:42, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's me again! I fixed the two my questions! Myeonghanyu (talk) 03:13, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on your talk page. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 19:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from Kristinmask

I beg a moment of your time. I'm in Ijmusic's Berklee Visions of Music's Future course, and I would love your opinion on my proposed article. It's a work in progress and I'm aware that my subject is probably not relevant enough to warrant a full wikipedia article. That being said, I've tried create a solid presentation regardless. It's my first Wikipedia article and needs criticism so, if you have time, please check it out. Sincere thanks.

My Sandbox Link[[11]]

Kristinmask (talk) 18:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on your talk page. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 19:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the input! I will get to work on improving those aspects and get back to you later. Sincerely, Kristinmask (talk) 21:38, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, I've made a number of modifications per your advice. Once again I would greatly appreciate your opinion of the updates. Thanks, Kristinmask (talk) 19:55, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My Sandbox again [[12]]

again, you shine a light

Thank you for your advice! I have done as you said, to the best of my ability. Is it alright if I edit the Joaquin Turina page again with my new version? Would you like to see it first? Snaudrey (talk) 00:41, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on your talk page. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 19:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, again

Thank you again, dear VdiT, for helping my students so generously. Your compendious knowledge continues to dazzle me, as do your worthy and specific suggestions for improvements. You enable us all to excel. Gratefully yours, Ijmusic (talk) 21:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please help

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rinaelyse (talk • contribs) 23:03, 15 December 2014‎

• Replied on your talk page. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 09:02, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may remember doing some work on Ada Cherry Kearton. I thought you would like to now that the BBC now link to it, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/features/desert-island-discs/castaway/06c4739d#p009y95q - Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:49, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HiAndy. Thanks for letting me know. By the way, I haven't forgotten about David Ward, I've just been a bit busy with other stuff. I hope to get to it in the New Year. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 09:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Elsevier - science and medicine journals and books
• Royal Society of Chemistry - chemistry journals
• Pelican Books - ebook monographs
• Public Catalogue Foundation- art books
• our partners page.

Hi Voce. No frills - just a quiet ‘’all the best’’ to you for 2015 and I hope you’ll continue to be around on Wikipedia for a long time to come. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:53, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HiKudpung. A very happy new year to you too! I'm back on January 8th. I have a wonderful but neglected baritone (or two) to write about. Hee Hee. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 06:56, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[13] The user seems to be trying to get in touch with you. Could you take a look please? - NQ (talk) 15:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HiNQ. Thanks for letting me know. Quite mystifying but the person sounds very distressed. Without the name of the article, there's not much we can do, and I can't recall any article that fits this description that I've edited recently. Anyhow I left a message on their talk page and also suggested they contact OTRS volunteers if they're worried about revealing the name of the article on-wiki. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 16:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I was about to leave a message on their talk, but thought you might have a better understanding of what they were referring to. - NQ (talk) 04:28, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear VdiT, Though the Longy class is taking a break until next Fall, Berklee's back for the Spring semester. I will of course send students to the Tea House and to The Wikipedia Adventure; however, if the brave ones venture your way, I hope that you might have a few moments for them. Hope you're well! Yours, Ijmusic (talk) 03:19, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note to self. Oberheim ob-1, Draft:Lai Ying Tong, User:Ichmusic/sandbox. – Voceditenore (talk) 09:28, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

... a massage as well? ;) Cf. your own observation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Worldchampion2014/Archive. -- Sam <sup>Sing!</sup> 10:13, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, Sam, it's quite obvious what's going on . So far, they're sticking to inane comments on the talk page, but the minute they attempt editing the article, I'm off to SPI. Voceditenore (talk) 10:36, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was checking those three links yesterday in Archive.org, but you beat me at adding {{dead link}}. No versions were archived of the two of them, and the one cite that already included an archived_url had been deleted in Archive.org. What do we do in such cases? Add the cite, then quote the full text in a cot/cob on the talk page and have two other editors confirm it before somebody gets the source deleted? -- Sam <sup>Sing!</sup> 10:49, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sam, per WP:Link rot (Do not delete cited information solely because the URL to the source does not work any longer. WP:Verifiability does not require that all information be supported by a working link, nor does it require the source to be published online.), we leave them for now. For one thing Focus is also a print magazine, and theoretically, anyone could find those articles in a library. On the other hand the other existing refs are also more than adequate for verifying what is actually in the WP article. I'm also collecting multiple other sources as backup and having them archived + the relevant quotes. Beans-wise, perhaps let sleeping dogs lie for the moment? Voceditenore (talk) 11:55, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's one of a million articles I wouldn't return to for a second, were it not for the whitewashing. :) -- Sam <sup>Sing!</sup> 10:18, 13 February 2015 (UTC) P.S. Your two former messages did not show up on my notifications list. Could that be because of the piped plain link? Could you try to reply using [[User:Sam Sailor|]], please?[reply]

I had piped it as you suggest. How odd! OK, here's a non-piped link, User:Sam Sailor, let me know if that works. Anyhow, my feelings are exactly the same concerning that article. UGH! In my most recent reply on the talk page, I quite explicitly pointed them to read WP:SOCK. We'll see what happens. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 08:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I didn't get a notification there either. Yesterday over on WT:MATH, {{Reply to}} didn't work as well. Something is rotten in the State of Ping, the Vaterland of Ms. Butterfly. ;) Enjoy your weekend. -- Sam <sup>Sing!</sup> 12:12, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HiSam. The non-pinging pings were/are an ongoing saga and are seemingly unpredictable in their bad behaviour. See the Village Pump here for the latest. And speaking of bad behaviour... All seems to have gone quiet on the "massage" front. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 14:43, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I got this one loud and clear. Weird. The WMF are surely pulling our legs here. ;) -- Sam <sup>Sing!</sup> 14:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:23, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Three years ago, you were the eighteenth recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize. Thank you also for your most recent assistance, - let's keep singing, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:00, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your guidance and suggestions. Are you willing to monitor my progress at the article as I rectify the issues there? Rationalobserver (talk) 19:48, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, there is a greater than zero probability that the editor who keeps adding misguided and unhelpful comments at the RBP talk page is a sock-troll that is WP:NOTHERE to build an encyclopedia. Rationalobserver (talk) 16:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HiRationalobserver. Re the monitoring, I'll keep an eye on it, but I haven't the time for any detailed stuff. I'm "looking after" a load of music conservatory students who are in the process of taking their first steps on Wikipedia, I see that I JethroBT has said he'll be looking at the prose issues in more detail over the next couple of days, which is great. I'm pretty much finished with the talk page discussion for now. My main concern was to dispel some of the serious misconceptions being bandied around about the Bayley book, and to suggest some other directly relevant sources which you could use to round out the narrative and vary the perspective.

Re the other stuff, my advice is to strictly avoid speculating about the motivations of other editors. It never ends well. If their suggestions are useful for improving an article, take them up. If not, ignore them. I think both you and the editor in question got off to a shaky start here because both of you had dived almost immediately into meta-issues and discussions, some of which were interpersonal minefields. In fact, I'd advise both of you to stick solely to content creation for at least a year. Voceditenore (talk) 18:23, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. Will you please make a comment there regarding the current state of paraphrasing and attribution, as I've made several improvements in that regard directly related to your suggestions, and it would be helpful to get some input from you there that addresses the initial concerns? Rationalobserver (talk) 18:28, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you're interested and not too busy, I've opened Wikipedia:Peer review/Rose-Baley Party/archive1. It would be great to get some feedback on the current state of prose and paraphrasing. Rationalobserver (talk) 19:09, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Voceditenore. You may remember me from the Alessandra Marianelli bio.

I'd like to create one now for Sylvia Schwartz.

The main problem with my first attempt was that I didn't know how to evaluate the various sources of information I found. You considered many that I proposed as inadequate.

For Sylvia Schwartz, could I send you a list of the sources I've found (not their contents), so that you could tell me which to exclude?

Many thanks for all you do for Opera on Wikipedia,

Lisaby 18:29, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

HiLisaby. Many apologies for this late reply! I suggest that you list your proposed sources at User:Lisaby/Sylvia Schwartz. I'm about to be travelling for the next two weeks. But I will definitely have a look when I get back. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 16:40, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I found out on ESCKAZ.com that Mary-Jean O'Doherty was born in April of 1982. In other words, please stop changing her birth date to February of 1989, okay?

RebeccaTheAwesomeXD (talk) 19:37, 3 March 2015 (UTC)RebeccaTheAwesomeXD[reply]

No, I'm afraid it's not OK. I have left you a lengthy explanation at your talk page and further comment at Talk:Mary-Jean O'Doherty. Voceditenore (talk) 08:22, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library/Newsletter/January-February2015

I wanted to take a moment to thank you for the edits and work put into this page. I felt they were very necessary, clearly sourced, and helped save a page from deletion (due to the entire page being directly copy-pasted from a copyrighted source). Jcmcc450 (talk) 18:11, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Jcmcc450. Yes, even if it hadn't been copyvio the rampant puffery was completely out of order. I wish I could convince COI editors (and the article had several of them) that writing like that detracts badly from the subject's image rather than enhancing it. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 16:54, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that a draft you could either accept as a stub or decline in a very few minutes? Use Preferences → Gadgets → Yet Another AFC Helper Script, or use {{afc comment|your comment here}} directly in the draft. Best, -- Sam Sailor <sup>Talk!</sup> 09:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HiSam. I've accepted it as a stub—manually. (I've never been able to get that stupid script to work, and in any case, I prefer a more personal touch when accepting articles.) Anyhow, it's slightly more than what is already in one small part of Music of Poland, and can easily be expanded. It's clearly is a topic worthy of a stand alone article. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 10:34, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great, I knew it was one for you. Enjoy your day, -- Sam Sailor <sup>Talk!</sup> 10:37, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on this, lots of good stuff in there! If I had to describe the building, though, I'd go for something more "scimitar-like": [14] What do you think? Scarabocchio (talk) 19:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HiScarabocchio! Well, it's sort of a piano swooning :), hence the "reminiscent". I'm just going by what the French seem to think of it. I've added a ref. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 14:38, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note to self, this is about Opéra de Dijon. Voceditenore (talk) 15:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HiVoceditenore, I was very much taken with the Daliesque 'reminiscent of a swooning grand piano' and am disappointed that you were not able to find a ref for that. Scarabocchio (talk) 15:52, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I did a fairly extensive rewrite of the Verismo (music) page, following up on our discussions on the talk page there almost 2 years (!) ago. I think it could still use some more quality citations, but I wondered if you'd provide any other suggestions. I left the section on verismo singers pretty much alone, although it is not well cited and I have some doubts about what it is saying. Also, I've been chipping away at the Puccini page, and would welcome suggestions there. Specifically, in terms of structure. The Puccini article has a chronological account of his works, followed by about 5 or 6 sections that address some aspect of his life non-chronologically. I can't help but wonder if it wouldn't be better to integrate this material into the main chronology, as in the Verdi page, but that would require a very substantial rewrite. Thoughts? David.thompson.esq (talk) 00:29, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HiDavid. Sorry for my tardy reply. I got quite sidetracked this past month, mainly by my runaway librettist. I'm about to be travelling for the next two weeks. Will definitely have a look when I get back. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 16:30, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has restored the copyvio tag at RBP ([15]). I thought this was the wrong tag in the first place. Rationalobserver (talk) 18:15, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commented at Talk:Rose–Baley Party. - Voceditenore (talk) 14:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's no article for André Previn's song cycle Honey and Rue! I might give this a go at some point. What do you reckon? FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:23, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it, FoCuS! Famous composer, texts by famous poet, premiered by famous singer. What's not to like? Best, Voceditenore (talk) 14:44, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Voceditenore, Thank you so much for your time and I will contact Audrey and let her know the article is now up. Take care and please let me know if there is something I can do for you. Mary L. Conceptual-Aesthetics (talk) 17:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC)Conceptual-Aesthetics[reply]

Replied at your talk page. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 17:13, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On6 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Domenico Lalli, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Sebastiano Biancardi, suspected of embezzlement, left his family and became a successful librettist known as Domenico Lalli? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Domenico Lalli. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Thanks for your help with this project Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message and for your help. Looking forward to your return. Yours, Ijmusic (talk) 20:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you again for your help previously. I have just saved some edits to the Audrey Capel Doray article. Can you please let me know what changes I need to make, assuming I need to make some? Conceptual-Aesthetics (talk) 20:53, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Conceptual-Aesthetics April 21, 2015[reply]

Replied on your talk page. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 13:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Voceditenore, I'm a Professor Jackson's student and I'm trying to write an article about Bill Evans album Eloquence. Could you have a look at it and give me some suggestions? Thank you! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ichmusic/sandbox Ichmusic (talk) 16:32, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 13:36, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your edits on my Piano Burning draft. I will continue to add as much information as i can, and i sincerely appreciate as much help as you can provide to ensure my article becomes a page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chillypee (talk • contribs) 17:38, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome, Chillypee! I've left more at your talk page. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 11:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Voceditenore, thank you for the help with my article about Amit Golan! I'm very happy to see it was accepted! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amcmusic92 (talk • contribs) 03:48, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure, Amcmusic92, . Best, Voceditenore (talk) 11:29, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As of today's date April 27, 2015 I have uploaded what I can to my neophyte article about Audrey Capel Doray. This includes one image, which I understand may be deleted. Because she is a visual artist I feel that she needs a gallery of her work added to the article. The article also needs to be edited, with her input, for errors and also for further Wikipedia errors I have made. I am not able to continue with this project at the moment and ask if you are willing to assist her with the article directly? I know that she appreciates the work we've done so far. If you agree I can give you her email address. Conceptual-Aesthetics (talk) 18:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Conceptual AestheticsConceptual-Aesthetics (talk) 18:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your additions!!