Contents

Talk:Pink slime

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pink slime article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 90 days

Pink slime has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassessit.

Article milestones Date Process Result May 13, 2012 Good article nominee Listed July 29, 2012 Featured article candidate Not promoted August 13, 2012 Good article reassessment Delisted November 16, 2012 Good article reassessment Not listed March 25, 2016 Good article nominee Listed Afact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 6, 2016. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that lean finely textured beef, also known as pink slime, in the U.S ground beef supply declined from 70% in March 2012 to around 5% in March 2013, in part due to news media coverage about it? Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink: Foodservice Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Related taskforces: /  This article is supported by the Foodservice task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages. Agriculture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted on 15 May 2012 by reviewer Encycloshave (talk · contribs).

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination. Discussions: Moved, 13 March 2012, from Boneless lean beef trimmingstoPink slime, see discussion. Not moved, 25 March 2012, from Pink slimetoBoneless lean beef trimmings, see discussion. Not moved, 2 August 2012, from Pink slimetoLean finely textured beef, see discussion. Not moved, 7 July 2017, from Pink slimetoLean finely textured beef, see discussion.

This article repeatedly claims that 70% of products included pink slime in 2012. I don't know if that's true or not, but the only source given is the ABC news report, which as the rest of the article points out was the subject of a large and fairly successful defamation suit. 128.12.122.106 (talk) 04:34, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just replying to bring attention to this question as it appears to have gone unnoticed 2405:6E00:2441:702F:191F:B3F6:B6FB:407 (talk) 09:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article focuses on US issues with the product and lacks views from other places except Europe. In Brazil, for instance, I doubt even half of the population knows about this product, despite having crises in 2014-16 regarding meat additives at several meat processing plants. Anacforcelli (talk) 22:45, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the {{Globalize}} template from the article (diff), which stated, "The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject." This was done because Pink slime (also known as lean finely textured beef or LFTB, finely textured beef, or boneless lean beef trimmings or BLBT) is an American invention and product. No evidence has been provided here that it is used in other countries. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:56, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It would be good if someone with either industry or chemistry experience could elaborate on what happens to the ammonium hydroxide produced on/in the beef before packaging. It's not clear if there is residual NH3 or the OH after the extrusion&treatment. I'm assuming the "pencil thin" extrusion is so the gaseous NH3 reaches the largest surface area possible, but it's not mentioned whether the formed OH remains on the surface/permeates the meat (it must, to completely kill microorgs, right? Pencil thin is NOT THAT THIN), or if it decomposes, or is a safe additive or what.

This could clear up a lot of the controversy IMO. It's beef made with ammonia... The presence and safety of ammonia in the final product is probably important. 99.192.12.115 (talk) 18:11, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Ammonium hydroxide" does not really exist on its own. It's just ammonia in water solution, made when ammonia reaches the water in beef. Solubility of any gas, including ammonia, in water reduces sharply when heated. Ground beef is supposed to be cooked, so that should release most of the ammonia. You can probably make a very crude test of ammonia levels by just heating and sniffing. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/AN281 gives useful numbers on ammonia levels. Artoria2e5 🌉 03:38, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Slime is pejorative and therefore not allowed by common name rules. There is already disambiguation and the pink slime is more commonly used in reference to the media. The title should be changed. 208.77.255.249 (talk) 18:17, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This move is not a minor edit and consensus is needed first. such changes without consensus are disruptive. While the industry may be using 'Lean finely textured beef' the press, including the AP in 2022, is still using 'pink slime' to discuss this product. I suggest you move it back or you are likely to be reverted. Dialectric (talk) 18:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aperseghin: I have reverted the move of the article since, based on the discussions linked in the yellow box at the top of the page, it's a potentially controvertial move and would need to be discussed first. If you wish to proceed with this process, please see the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]