![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Thanks for uploading File:Louis Emmanuel Rey.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:12, 4 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:12, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for your message and congratulations for your contributions. The two generals are now on my watchlist too, so I will help keep vandals and irrelevant content away. Austrian generals are a subject I'm interested in, although I will work on French ones exclusively. But it's good to know that someone competent is giving the Austrian generals the attention they deserve. Just to let you know, I am planning a massive extension of the Battle of Wagram, like the one I wrote on the Romanian wiki. It would be useful to have some more extensive articles on the following commanders: Prince Reuss-Plauen; Rosenberg-Orsini; Johan von Kollowrat; Archduke John; Prince Hohenzollern-Hechingen; Prince von Liechtenstein; general Radetzky; French émigré Armand von Nordmann; generals Grunne and Wimpffen and French general Roussel d'Hurbal who at the time was fighting for Austria. If you feel like contributing to creating/expanding any of these biographies, it would be great, as it would help achieve better coverage of the battle of Wagram in preparation of the expansion work that I'm planning.
Regarding the battle of Toulouse, I know that it's often the subject of debate. I've added the point of view of 3 mainstream French specialists who have written some standard work on the Napoleonic period. They believe that it was a French victory. We now have both points of view - that it was a Anglo-Allied or a French victory and we have both claims well sourced so debates should be over.Best,--Alexandru Demian (talk) 18:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:21, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the plaudit!Urselius (talk) 10:56, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:41, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
nice article on Keinmayer. :) I'm trying to put together a better list than the one that just lists the names. Here: User:Auntieruth55/Habsburg Field Marshal List. Would you take a look and see if I should do something different as I'm working on it? (better now than later). Auntieruth55 (talk) 01:10, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
take a look now. I'm thinking about omitting the campaigns, expanding the notes section. Or adding a column for "origin" since the Habsburgs tried to match up units with commanders of the similar ethnicity. Auntieruth55 (talk) 20:00, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The WikiChevrons | |
For a decent article about military history that I have no idea to improve upon, I give you this barnstar. I dream of horses @ 03:45, 7 June 2010 (UTC) |
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
— AustralianRupert (talk) 04:48, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Message added 04:20, 18 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello. Yes, I had seen your edits of the article about Caldiero and I'm very happy that due to your contributions, the article is now more complete. It has always been my point of view that, so long as a contributor quotes solid sources, any point of view is acceptable. So, no problem as far as I am concerned, on the contrary. My only objection comes when contributors try to present minority opinions as being mainstream. Caldiero is obviously not the case, but there are battles (e.g. Borodino) that are now presented on wikipedia in ways that are, in my view, historically inaccurate. Regarding the French army ranks, I've always used the actual names (translated versions such as General of Division or sometimes French rank names in italics). This is because I privilege accuracy, even if it makes things more complicated for the occasional layman reader (does a layman really care...?). Conversely, if the reader knows a thing or two about Napoleonic military history, he will probably be surprised to see the Major General rank in the French army. Best,--Alexandru Demian (talk) 19:43, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
I want to thank you for creating such a great new article, Battle of Verona (1805). I was browsing the new pages when I came across your article and I had to stop to appreciate your work. A lot of the new pages created are not fit for Wikipedia, and it's really nice to see one as admirable as yours among the lot. Thank you. --Odie5533 (talk) 05:23, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for improving this article with an infobox! Herostratus (talk) 13:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
The military history wikiproject will soon open the September 2010 coordinator elections to determine who among us will serve on the X Tranche, the coordinator tranche beginning 28 September of this month. The current coordinators have offered up the names of a limited number of editors who we believe would make good coordinators, and your name was included in the list. Therefore, I am leaving this message on behalf of the current milhist coordinators to encourage you to run for the position of coordinator. If you have any questions or comments about the position you are welcome to ask any members of the current coordinator tranche, we would be happy to answer your questions. Note that while this message is being left to encourage you to run for the position you are under no obligation to do so, and if you decide not to run this decision will not be held against you now or at any point in the future.
On belhalf of the Military history Coordinator IX Tranche, TomStar81 (Talk) 00:17, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out the problem about the Piave River. I hadn't noticed the article about the WW1 battle because it had "the" in the title, so I thought there was no need to mention the year. Unfortunately, I can't move it to "Battle of the Piave River (1809)" because it already exists as a redirect to the current page and I'm not familiar with the procedure in such a case.
Regarding the Battle of Marengo, I've already proposed it for an A-class review and was working on creating stubs for the more important generals involved in the battle.
I'm glad that there are other users interested in such a domain and I'd really like to congratulate you on the articles you've expanded so far, especially as you've contributed with self-made maps as well. My other long-term goals are to bring Grande Armée to featured status, expand the Imperial and Royal Army during the Napoleonic Wars (I'm not really happy with the title as a non-specialist reader would have no idea it's actually about the Austrian army) and maybe create an article on Napoleonic warfare. If you'd like to work on the same subject in the future, just give me a message and I'll see how I can help. You can also speak to Alexandru.demian, who's a good friend of mine and has a wide range of research materials.
PS: A suggestion for your articles: I think you should move the larger OOB's to separate pages as they provide detailed information which for a simple reader would seem overwhelming and they also use up a lot space. Cheers, Andynomite (talk) 11:00, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.
With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team, Roger Davies talk 21:32, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thank your for your interest. I've added several citations to the paragraphs lacking of them at their ends. About the grammar, I'll wellcome your help. ElBufon (talk) 16:46, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On26 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Graz, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On30 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Anton von Zach, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 12:04, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out the errors on Stanley Gordon Orr. I have reworked some of the text of you would like to check. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 04:45, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Last stand#Unsourced material -- PBS (talk) 09:50, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
I'm working on cleaning up some files, and I came across File:Johann Kolowrat.jpg. You uploaded it, presumably from [2], and indicated that the copyright holder has released it into the public domain. I don't speak German, and don't even see that image at that location, so I am having trouble confirming that the copyright holder has released the file into PD. Can you help me?--SPhilbrickT 22:30, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
I left this reply on my user page. People seem to differ about where they like to have replies so I repeat it here: "Thanks. I have written an expanded introduction and saved the page so it is online. Even after the first expanded draft, I think the article was short enough that the short introduction from the stub could still be used. I agree that with the longer article, a longer introduction is appropriate and in line with the guideline. I am trying to figure out the comment on the footnotes. I had a couple of citation needed templates put on an earlier article where I had citations for 80 to 90 per cent of the sentences and the others seemed to me to be related but they were tagged anyway. So I would like to be able to have the right form for including more than one sentence in a footnote and not have it tagged. On the other hand, since I have figured out how to make multiple references to the same footnote, I suppose that form does not waste as much space and is not a real bad alternative."Donner60 (talk) 08:22, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Message added 13:44, 13 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thanks for reviewing the article and fixing this - I've got scheer on the brain. Parsecboy (talk) 04:59, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello, congratulations for the beautiful article on General Sahuc. I think you will be happy to see this. Best, --Alexandru Demian (talk) 13:26, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
You are welcome! BTW, you wrote a very nice article, and if you need any help in improving it further, I will be happy to assist. Regards, Kebeta (talk) 18:44, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
Hello! I've just finished work on this article. I can't actually believe that I've finished, it took me weeks of hard work. Anyway, I just wanted to see if you could have a look at it for proofreading, when you have time. I'm guessing that, since I've done some major translations from French, there would be phrases which are either unclear or should be improved. Best,--Alexandru Demian (talk) 21:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I've added some info to your article Battle of Lübeck. Above all, I found French losses: 1,500 men overall, killed and wounded. I've also added other elements. Do feel free to move it around as you like, if you think it does not suit well stylistically. Great work! Best,--Alexandru Demian (talk) 00:18, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Djmaschek, I've put up the article about General Nansouty for A-Class Review here. Your review would be much appreciated. Best,--Alexandru Demian (talk) 23:24, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
I think you misread it. The name of the river is Wkra not Wrka.--Obsidi♠nSoul 05:06, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Writer's Barnstar | |
For placing second in the May 2011 Military history WikiProject Contest with 30 points from 5 entries, I am delighted to present you with The Writer's Barnstar. Well done! Ian Rose (talk) 13:33, 1 June 2011 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Writer's Barnstar | |
For placing second in the June 2011 Military history WikiProject Contest with 18 points from three entries, I am delighted to present you with The Writer's Barnstar. Well done! Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 16:38, 2 July 2011 (UTC) |
Hi there, I notice you're signed up to the WikiProject Military history/Napoleonic era task forceinMILHIST, and wondered if you would be interested in conducting an A-class review for Battle record of Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington, based on your "speciality" areas, i.e. battles; I require one more Support review before it will be applicable to raise it from B to A-class quality. Thanks, Ma®©usBritish (talk) 05:44, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi Djmaschek, sorry for being so slow in replying. I'm actually on holiday and with limited access to the internet. The phrase is indeed surprising, as Napoleon is actually saying: "I have never done any good (bestowed any favours) to that man; Metz is still ours." He is probably referring to his perception of 1813-1814 that the generals who had received the most significant promotions and titles were the ones who were least motivated to keep on fighting. Conversely, since Napoleon had not bestowed any favours to Durutte, the latter would do everything in his power to defend the city and thus prove his talents. I'll look into what photos I can find of the respective generals in a short while. Best, --Alexandru Demian (talk) 09:52, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
I am cleaning up François Sebastien Charles Joseph de Croix, Count of Clerfayt (mainly adding inline citation for EB1911). I came across an in-line citation in the text that says:
That you added on 20 Feb 2010 I had a look around the net and the only mention I can find for "Smith-Kudrna" is Wikipedia articles or their mirrors. One of the other articles was Paul Davidovich which I see you added in the Smith-Kudrna citation on 7 March 2010. Please could you provide more details on the Count of Clerfayt page (date, publisher isbn, or if on line a url) so that the citation can be easily verified? -- PBS (talk) 01:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
{{cite book}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(help); External link in |publisher=
(help); Invalid |ref=harv
(help)--PBS (talk) 02:44, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi! I've just discovered this award on my talk page. Thanks a lot, Djmaschek! It's nice to have one's work recognised this way. Best,--Alexandru Demian (talk) 09:13, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey Djmaschek, I noticed you edited the James Inglis Hamilton article, and I thank you for that. It was quite helpful. I do have one (it may be stupid) question though. Which source lists his birth date as "before 1742"?
—Michael Jester (talk) 05:03, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
The Napoleonic Wars PortalHello, Djmaschek! I should like to announce a brand new wiki portal at Napoleonic Wars, which I have created for this huge historical topic. Please feel free to visit and participate in its development. «Vive l'empereur!» —Regards, Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] |
![]() |
![]() New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Djmaschek/Archive 2! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Hey, I've fixed up the assessment on Simeon Thayer. All good: B class. Vought109 (talk) 03:29, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Please see
This is mostly how that campaignbox should be done, plus the refinement of liststyle = hlist, as described in that discussion. Whatever widening you're referring to is most likely due to your not having the current version of things like MediaWiki:common.css in your browser cache. Please purge things, and look again. Alarbus (talk) 02:55, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Please note that the principal author of this is User:Halibutt, you may want to copy that message from my talk page to his. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 05:39, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Battle of Hohenlinden March of Richpanse.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:21, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Djmaschek, very good job on E Oswald...well assembled and noted. A mention of his father lost at sea does not seem important to the history-line, that I can see. The depth of history is quite interesting, expecially the battles. Suggest having subsection breaks in both of the two main sections. Also, suggest replacing some of the book references with some of your on-line references so readers or future reviewer can access on-lines sources for you information. I rated the article B, as you have done very well in creating this article. Thank you for your valuable time and effort in our American history. Cheers, Lance...LanceBarber (talk) 18:45, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The History Barnstar | |
Presented to Djmaschek (talk · contribs) for an impressive body of contributions to American and European military history articles on Wikipedia, and for your generous willingness to lend us your expertise and valuable time in these areas, I award you this History Barnstar. You are long overdue! Cheers, Lance...LanceBarber (talk) 19:13, 5 December 2011 (UTC) |
Hi. When you recently edited Jeremiah Olney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Cadwalader (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello Djmaschek. A few days ago you assessed Lewis Nicola and commented saying there were problems with the auto translations. I believe I have fixed (most) of the problems and was wondering if you could reassess the article. I plan on sending it to a peer review, hoping it can become a good article. Thanks is advanced and have a great New Year!
—Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 06:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On5 January 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Bull's Ferry, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that during the Battle of Bull's Ferry in New Jersey in 1780, Continental officer "Light-Horse Harry" Lee was in charge of rounding up British Army cattle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Bull's Ferry.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:06, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
That's ok. Apology accepted. Wild Wolf (talk) 04:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.
Hi. When you recently edited Patton's Additional Continental Regiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sir Henry Clinton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Richard Parker (colonel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Scott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
DJ, I'm enjoying your new articles. Did a B rating on both, failed; History sections a tad long, please add subsections to both. Thank you much. Cheers, Lance. LanceBarber (talk) 09:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Biography Barnstar | |
Thanks for creating the new Nathaniel Gist article; your efforts to improve Wikipedia are appreciated! Northamerica1000(talk) 10:26, 11 February 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. When you recently edited Nathaniel Gist, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cherokee War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
DJ, I found two Charles as I was trying to link the grandson to the Thurstons Add. Cont. Reg.:
As I was creating the disambig page to track the two Charles, User:Alan Liefting jumped in and wanted to delete the disambig page. As you are an Amer Rev expert, maybe you could follow up on the grandfather article. I am starting a new job tomorrow and with an hours drive to and from work, I'll have limited time on creating any new detailed wiki articles. Hope you can help, Thanks, Lance....LanceBarber (talk) 05:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The WikiChevrons | |
For placing second in the February 2012 Military history WikiProject Contest with 36 points from six entries, I am delighted to present you with The Writer's Barnstar. Well done! Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. When you recently edited Thomas Proctor (general), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bombardiers and Gunner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Battle of Eutaw Springs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Baptista Ashe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
I wonder if I could get you to make assessments of the following articles to see if they meet the "Class B" Criteria. These articles are included in the Book:Arkansas Confederate Units. I would appreciate any feed back that you could offer. Aleutian06 (talk) 13:57, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Writer's Barnstar | |
For placing second in the March 2012 Military history WikiProject Contest with 30 points from five entries, I am delighted to present you with The Writer's Barnstar. Well done! Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:30, 14 April 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. When you recently edited Battle of Voltri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
As the primary editor of this article, I thought that you'd be interested that I've written an article on HMS Vigilant (1777), the ship primarily responsible for the British victory. Some of the information in your article is incorrect and should be updated with the information from the ship's article.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:59, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for your recent articles, including Battle of Baza (1810). When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 17:33, 15 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:49, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Djmaschek! Apologies for taking 2 full months to respond to your note from May; it's just been a hectic period for me and I thus found little time for wikipedia. Great work on these articles; I myself have left a few articles unfinished, including the one on Lagrange, another on the title Marshal of the Empire and I still feel that the one about the grenadiers à cheval is not yet up the standard that would satisfy me.. But, in any case, I guess I have to prioritise and I'd really like to finish my massive article about the battle of Wagram and get it out of my sandbox once and for all, as it took a lot of time and energy to write and it would just be a pitty if no one could actually read it. There is also a peer review request put up for the battle of Corunna and I always feel that I need to contribute when such requests are made. But then again, so little time, so much to do.. Anyways. Hope all is well and I really enjoy reading your artIcles! Great work, neutral, well sourced and excellent narrative. Thanks for that. Best, --Alexandru Demian (talk) 07:19, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your suggestions for edits on this article. I will try to rewrite them as you suggest, however as a former Coast Guardsman, I know that there are legal differences between "distressed" and "damaged". I would be willing to bet that the entries in the Coast Guard Historians records are taken verbatim from the cutter's logbooks. The Coast Guard, for far too many years suffered from a lack of funds and operations were far more important than someone taking history notes, so the Coast Guard Historian's Office ran on a shoestring budget. It still does to a certain extent. One can tell little attention was paid to history when several years of cutter history don't even exist in published form. Using Point Franklin as an example, there is no published cutter history from 1886 to 1998 when it was decommissioned. The history happened; the cutter was in one of three operational phases, Alpha, Bravo or Charlie. Alpha being on active patrol, Bravo; in port, for crew rest and provisioning but still on call. Charlie is yard or maintenance availabilities that would preclude being on recall. My personal experience is that Charlie takes about ten percent of a cutters available time, give or take. The rest of the time would have been spent on law enforcement duties or search and rescue. They were busy, but the Historians Office has neither the time or the manpower to update the published record of the cutter. It is a crying shame, but the Point Class of cutters is not a big priority for the Historian's Office. They are to busy trying to keep up with recording and dissemination of current affairs on a limited budget. There are, to my knowledge, no other reliable published resources for the histories of this class of cutter. The part of the class that served in Vietnam are covered in several ways that have very reliable sources of information and articles on them were very easy to write without sounding mechanical about it. It is my wish to complete this class of cutters with articles in Wikipedia, but the Historians Office published accounts of their histories are in some cases are just a few sentences. That hardly gives credit to the crews of this class of cutters that risked their lives in many instances during rescues and during law enforcement evolutions. As someone who has been there, it is a sad state of affairs but there is nothing I can do about it. Some of the articles may be nothing more than stubs, but they should really be done to complete the class. Thank you for your suggestions, I will used them along with the limited amount of material at hand and keep plugging away. Cheers. Cuprum17 (talk) 16:44, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 08:55, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I am a french user of wikipedia, mostly on french wiki but also on several others including english. I would like to use the map you designed for battle of Sacile, (where one of my ancestors was heavily wounded in 1809), in french and italian wiki minimum. Why not using international commons instead of only english wikimedia ? Obviously i could do a copy myself, but i think, it is only fair that you keep your name on your beautiful maps, when they will be used every where in-Ze-World. Take care. --AchilleT (talk) 15:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Tarvis (1797), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyrol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Tarvis (1797), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Klausen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:56, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Pla (1811), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montblanc (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:47, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Castalla (1812), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Wellesley, Duke of Wellington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar |
Thank you for your Map of Sacile, given by a descendant of Napoleon's Grognard. AchilleT (talk) 17:04, 9 November 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louis Jean Nicolas Abbé, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Caldiero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Hey, Djmaschek. Thank you for creating pages on a few Farm to Market Roads in Texas. I've noticed you've been assessing them as stubs for WP:USRD. Just wanted to let you know that if you create an article that has the route description, history, and major intersections sections, it's a C-Class for USRD. Thanks. –TCN7JM 12:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:09, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacques Thomas Sarrut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vitoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of San Millan-Osma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santander (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:39, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louis Partouneaux, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:32, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:55, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Just came across the work you did on Battle of Sandwich (1217) back in 2011 - nice work! Hchc2009 (talk) 09:08, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:35, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey there. I have taken a good look at the Hahn Tx article. It looks to be a great start. However, I am having a tyad bit f trouble with the way maps are used. I think I have written over 2000 articles on snal places in the US and I think Hahn could be a great article if it was possible to relate why the places in Hahn are mentioned. (A famous battle, a famous family etc etc etc) Otherwise, the issue of notability comes along. Let me know how I can helpCoal town guy (talk) 20:32, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Message added 05:08, 2 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:08, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francisco Javier Venegas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Ucles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Arzobispo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Talavera (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Uclés (1809), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Madridejos and Ocaña (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:10, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Uclés (1809), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toledo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey Djmaschek. Nice to hear from you. I know that at least one notable person (Comte d'Artois) got them confused and censored one for joining Napoleon, while it was the other who had done that. Quite funny actually. Great work, anyway. Cheers, Alexandru. --Alexandru Demian (talk) 15:52, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edittoMatthews, Texas may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:59, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Do you participate in the Houston WikiProject? WhisperToMe (talk) 06:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited III Cavalry Corps (Grande Armée), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of the Berezina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 16:14, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:26, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Corps (Grande Armée), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Alcantara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siege of Mequinenza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tudela (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:12, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
All of them have been nominated for deletion, including {{Falls County, Texas Highways}}, which you created. Please feel free to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 26#Texas county highway navigational boxes. Imzadi 1979 → 23:21, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:13, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Second Siege of Badajoz (1811), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merida (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edittoBattle of Albuera may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:58, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:58, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Prince Friedrich of Hohenzollern.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Enrique José O'Donnell, Conde de La Bisbal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Sebastian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vinko Knežević, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Cassano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, if you have finished expanding this, would you mind my nominating this for Did you know, which would hopefully result in its appearing on the main page? Thanks, Matty.007 19:24, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:53, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:18, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:08, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Novi (1799), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army of Italy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:59, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siege of Le Quesnoy (1793), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siege of Valenciennes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi, we've started a Waterloo bicentennial project to bring related articles up to scratch and hope to get some featured at the time of the event(s). Let me know if you're interested! I hope so! auntieruth (talk) 16:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
another
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
|
NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou!
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Fantastic! I should do something like that for the Danube campaign of 1800. If I can figure out the template! :) auntieruth (talk) 18:46, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Neerwinden (1793) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MisterBee1966 -- MisterBee1966 (talk) 12:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Siege of Hüningen is at A-class review. Would you have a look? Also, have you tried archiving your talk page? It makes my computer crash! ;) This is the command: {{User:MiszaBot/config |counter = 4 |algo = old(20d) |archive = User talk:Auntieruth55/Archive %(counter)d }} {{archives|auto=yes|search=yes}}
take out the nowiki commands, of course. And add your name as User talk..... auntieruth (talk) 21:14, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
The article Battle of Neerwinden (1793) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Neerwinden (1793) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MisterBee1966 -- MisterBee1966 (talk) 12:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
You are by far the largest contributor to the article Battle of Molins de Rey -- thank you for writing it. When you have time please could you add in-line citations to the article. -- PBS (talk) 10:51, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Ettlingen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 20:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edittoBattle of Stockach (1800) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:31, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
The article Battle of Ettlingen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Ettlingen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. auntieruth (talk) 20:48, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Military history reviewers' award | |
For completing 1 review during October–December 2014, on behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I hereby award you the Military history reviewers' award. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 23:28, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jean Étienne Championnet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Fleurus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 6 February 2015 (UTC)