Contents

Statistical model

Introduction[edit]

Informally, a statistical model can be thought of as a statistical assumption (or set of statistical assumptions) with a certain property: that the assumption allows us to calculate the probability of any event. As an example, consider a pair of ordinary six-sided dice. We will study two different statistical assumptions about the dice.

The first statistical assumption is this: for each of the dice, the probability of each face (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) coming up is 1/6. From that assumption, we can calculate the probability of both dice coming up 5:  1/6 × 1/6 = 1/36.  More generally, we can calculate the probability of any event: e.g. (1 and 2) or (3 and 3) or (5 and 6). The alternative statistical assumption is this: for each of the dice, the probability of the face 5 coming up is 1/8 (because the dice are weighted). From that assumption, we can calculate the probability of both dice coming up 5:  1/8 × 1/8 = 1/64.  We cannot, however, calculate the probability of any other nontrivial event, as the probabilities of the other faces are unknown.

The first statistical assumption constitutes a statistical model: because with the assumption alone, we can calculate the probability of any event. The alternative statistical assumption does not constitute a statistical model: because with the assumption alone, we cannot calculate the probability of every event. In the example above, with the first assumption, calculating the probability of an event is easy. With some other examples, though, the calculation can be difficult, or even impractical (e.g. it might require millions of years of computation). For an assumption to constitute a statistical model, such difficulty is acceptable: doing the calculation does not need to be practicable, just theoretically possible.

Formal definition[edit]

In mathematical terms, a statistical model is usually^{[clarification needed]} thought of as a pair (${\displaystyle S,{\mathcal {P}}}$), where ${\displaystyle S}$ is the set of possible observations, i.e. the sample space, and ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {P}}}$ is a set of probability distributionson${\displaystyle S}$.^[3] The intuition behind this definition is as follows. It is assumed that there is a "true" probability distribution induced by the process that generates the observed data. We choose ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {P}}}$ to represent a set (of distributions) which contains a distribution that adequately approximates the true distribution. Note that we do not require that ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {P}}}$ contains the true distribution, and in practice that is rarely the case. Indeed, as Burnham & Anderson state, "A model is a simplification or approximation of reality and hence will not reflect all of reality"^[4]—hence the saying "all models are wrong". The set ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {P}}}$ is almost always parameterized: ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {P}}=\{F_{\theta }:\theta \in \Theta \}}$. The set of distributions ${\displaystyle \Theta }$ defines the parameters of the model. A parameterization is generally required to have distinct parameter values give rise to distinct distributions, i.e. ${\displaystyle F_{\theta _{1}}=F_{\theta _{2}}\Rightarrow \theta _{1}=\theta _{2}}$ must hold (in other words, it must be injective). A parameterization that meets the requirement is said to be identifiable.^[3]

An example[edit]

Suppose that we have a population of children, with the ages of the children distributed uniformly, in the population. The height of a child will be stochastically related to the age: e.g. when we know that a child is of age 7, this influences the chance of the child being 1.5 meters tall. We could formalize that relationship in a linear regression model, like this: height_i = b₀ + b₁age_i + ε_i, where b₀ is the intercept, b₁ is a parameter that age is multiplied by to obtain a prediction of height, ε_i is the error term, and i identifies the child. This implies that height is predicted by age, with some error.

An admissible model must be consistent with all the data points. Thus, a straight line (height_i = b₀ + b₁age_i) cannot be the equation for a model of the data—unless it exactly fits all the data points, i.e. all the data points lie perfectly on the line. The error term, ε_i, must be included in the equation, so that the model is consistent with all the data points. To do statistical inference, we would first need to assume some probability distributions for the ε_i. For instance, we might assume that the ε_i distributions are i.i.d. Gaussian, with zero mean. In this instance, the model would have 3 parameters: b₀, b₁, and the variance of the Gaussian distribution. We can formally specify the model in the form (${\displaystyle S,{\mathcal {P}}}$) as follows. The sample space, ${\displaystyle S}$, of our model comprises the set of all possible pairs (age, height). Each possible value of ${\displaystyle \theta }$ = (b₀, b₁, σ²) determines a distribution on ${\displaystyle S}$; denote that distribution by ${\displaystyle F_{\theta }}$. If ${\displaystyle \Theta }$ is the set of all possible values of ${\displaystyle \theta }$, then ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {P}}=\{F_{\theta }:\theta \in \Theta \}}$. (The parameterization is identifiable, and this is easy to check.)

In this example, the model is determined by (1) specifying ${\displaystyle S}$ and (2) making some assumptions relevant to ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {P}}}$. There are two assumptions: that height can be approximated by a linear function of age; that errors in the approximation are distributed as i.i.d. Gaussian. The assumptions are sufficient to specify ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {P}}}$—as they are required to do.

General remarks[edit]

A statistical model is a special class of mathematical model. What distinguishes a statistical model from other mathematical models is that a statistical model is non-deterministic. Thus, in a statistical model specified via mathematical equations, some of the variables do not have specific values, but instead have probability distributions; i.e. some of the variables are stochastic. In the above example with children's heights, ε is a stochastic variable; without that stochastic variable, the model would be deterministic. Statistical models are often used even when the data-generating process being modeled is deterministic. For instance, coin tossing is, in principle, a deterministic process; yet it is commonly modeled as stochastic (via a Bernoulli process). Choosing an appropriate statistical model to represent a given data-generating process is sometimes extremely difficult, and may require knowledge of both the process and relevant statistical analyses. Relatedly, the statistician Sir David Cox has said, "How [the] translation from subject-matter problem to statistical model is done is often the most critical part of an analysis".^[5]

There are three purposes for a statistical model, according to Konishi & Kitagawa.^[6]

• Predictions
• Extraction of information
• Description of stochastic structures

Those three purposes are essentially the same as the three purposes indicated by Friendly & Meyer: prediction, estimation, description.^[7] The three purposes correspond with the three kinds of logical reasoning: deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, abductive reasoning.^{[citation needed][clarification needed]}

Dimension of a model[edit]

Suppose that we have a statistical model (${\displaystyle S,{\mathcal {P}}}$) with ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {P}}=\{F_{\theta }:\theta \in \Theta \}}$. In notation, we write that ${\displaystyle \Theta \subseteq \mathbb {R} ^{k}}$ where k is a positive integer (${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }$ denotes the real numbers; other sets can be used, in principle). Here, k is called the dimension of the model. The model is said to be parametricif${\displaystyle \Theta }$ has finite dimension.^{[citation needed]} As an example, if we assume that data arise from a univariate Gaussian distribution, then we are assuming that

${\displaystyle {\mathcal {P}}=\left\{F_{\mu ,\sigma }($x)\equiv {\frac {1}{{\sqrt {2\pi }}\sigma }}\exp \left(-{\frac {(x-\mu )^{2}}{2\sigma ^{2}}}\right):\mu \in \mathbb {R} ,\sigma >0\right\}} .

In this example, the dimension, k, equals 2. As another example, suppose that the data consists of points (x, y) that we assume are distributed according to a straight line with i.i.d. Gaussian residuals (with zero mean): this leads to the same statistical model as was used in the example with children's heights. The dimension of the statistical model is 3: the intercept of the line, the slope of the line, and the variance of the distribution of the residuals. (Note the set of all possible lines has dimension 2, even though geometrically, a line has dimension 1.)

Although formally ${\displaystyle \theta \in \Theta }$ is a single parameter that has dimension k, it is sometimes regarded as comprising k separate parameters. For example, with the univariate Gaussian distribution, ${\displaystyle \theta }$ is formally a single parameter with dimension 2, but it is often regarded as comprising 2 separate parameters—the mean and the standard deviation. A statistical model is nonparametric if the parameter set ${\displaystyle \Theta }$ is infinite dimensional. A statistical model is semiparametric if it has both finite-dimensional and infinite-dimensional parameters. Formally, if k is the dimension of ${\displaystyle \Theta }$ and n is the number of samples, both semiparametric and nonparametric models have ${\displaystyle k\rightarrow \infty }$as${\displaystyle n\rightarrow \infty }$. If ${\displaystyle k/n\rightarrow 0}$as${\displaystyle n\rightarrow \infty }$, then the model is semiparametric; otherwise, the model is nonparametric.

Parametric models are by far the most commonly used statistical models. Regarding semiparametric and nonparametric models, Sir David Cox has said, "These typically involve fewer assumptions of structure and distributional form but usually contain strong assumptions about independencies".^[8]

Nested models[edit]

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this articlebyadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Statistical model" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Two statistical models are nested if the first model can be transformed into the second model by imposing constraints on the parameters of the first model. As an example, the set of all Gaussian distributions has, nested within it, the set of zero-mean Gaussian distributions: we constrain the mean in the set of all Gaussian distributions to get the zero-mean distributions. As a second example, the quadratic model

y = b₀ + b₁x + b₂x² + ε,    ε ~ 𝒩(0, σ²)

has, nested within it, the linear model

y = b₀ + b₁x + ε,    ε ~ 𝒩(0, σ²)

—we constrain the parameter b₂ to equal 0.

In both those examples, the first model has a higher dimension than the second model (for the first example, the zero-mean model has dimension 1). Such is often, but not always, the case. As an example where they have the same dimension, the set of positive-mean Gaussian distributions is nested within the set of all Gaussian distributions; they both have dimension 2.

Comparing models[edit]

Comparing statistical models is fundamental for much of statistical inference. Konishi & Kitagawa (2008, p. 75) state: "The majority of the problems in statistical inference can be considered to be problems related to statistical modeling. They are typically formulated as comparisons of several statistical models." Common criteria for comparing models include the following: R², Bayes factor, Akaike information criterion, and the likelihood-ratio test together with its generalization, the relative likelihood.

Another way of comparing two statistical models is through the notion of deficiency introduced by Lucien Le Cam.^[9]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (September 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

References[edit]

Further reading[edit]

• Davison, A. C. (2008), Statistical Models, Cambridge University Press
• Drton, M.; Sullivant, S. (2007), "Algebraic statistical models" (PDF), Statistica Sinica, 17: 1273–1297
• Freedman, D. A. (2009), Statistical Models, Cambridge University Press
• Helland, I. S. (2010), Steps Towards a Unified Basis for Scientific Models and Methods, World Scientific
• Kroese, D. P.; Chan, J. C. C. (2014), Statistical Modeling and Computation, Springer
• Shmueli, G. (2010), "To explain or to predict?", Statistical Science, 25 (3): 289–310, arXiv:1101.0891, doi:10.1214/10-STS330, S2CID 15900983