Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Crew  



1.1  Backup crew  







2 Mission objectives  





3 Mission highlights  





4 Mission anomaly  





5 See also  





6 References  





7 External links  














STS-78: Difference between revisions






العربية
 / Bân-lâm-gú
Български
Čeština
Deutsch
فارسی
Français
Galego
Italiano
עברית
Magyar
Nederlands

Norsk bokmål
Norsk nynorsk
Polski
Português
Русский
Slovenčina
Svenska
Українська
Yorùbá

 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




Print/export  







In other projects  



Wikimedia Commons
 
















Appearance
   

 





Help
 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Browse history interactively
 Previous editNext edit 
Content deleted Content added
→‎Mission highlights: wording changes
Yatpay (talk | contribs)
81 edits
m →‎Mission anomaly: fix typo (field joins -> field joints)
Line 104: Line 104:


== Mission anomaly ==

== Mission anomaly ==

Although the launch went without any issue, an issue was discovered with the SRB's following recovery. Analysis showed worrying damage to the field joins which was likely caused by hot gases. This similar damage is what caused booster seals abord [[Space Shuttle Challenger|Space Shuttle ''Challenger'']] to break resulting in a [[Space Shuttle Challenger disaster|break-up mid-flight]]. The issue did not compromise astronaut safety because there was a hot gas path through the motors field joint but not the capture joint. Despite there being no issue with safety, it did raise questions of a new EPA required cleaning fluid.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.americaspace.com/2016/06/18/man-im-here-20-years-since-the-record-setting-mission-of-sts-78-part-1/|title='Man, I'm Here': 20 Years Since the Record-Setting Mission of STS-78 (Part 1)|date=June 18, 2016|website=AmericaSpace|language=en-US}}</ref>

Although the launch went without any issue, an issue was discovered with the SRB's following recovery. Analysis showed worrying damage to the field joints which was likely caused by hot gases. This similar damage is what caused booster seals abord [[Space Shuttle Challenger|Space Shuttle ''Challenger'']] to break resulting in a [[Space Shuttle Challenger disaster|break-up mid-flight]]. The issue did not compromise astronaut safety because there was a hot gas path through the motors field joint but not the capture joint. Despite there being no issue with safety, it did raise questions of a new EPA required cleaning fluid.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.americaspace.com/2016/06/18/man-im-here-20-years-since-the-record-setting-mission-of-sts-78-part-1/|title='Man, I'm Here': 20 Years Since the Record-Setting Mission of STS-78 (Part 1)|date=June 18, 2016|website=AmericaSpace|language=en-US}}</ref>



Due to the issue, [[STS-79]] which was meant to dock with the [[Mir|Space Station Mi]]<nowiki/>r and return astronaut [[Shannon Lucid]], was delayed. Options of returning Shannon on a Soyuz were considered, but never followed through as the Shuttle was considered safe and able to return Shannon.

Due to the issue, [[STS-79]] which was meant to dock with the [[Mir|Space Station Mi]]<nowiki/>r and return astronaut [[Shannon Lucid]], was delayed. Options of returning Shannon on a Soyuz were considered, but never followed through as the Shuttle was considered safe and able to return Shannon.


Revision as of 16:41, 28 January 2023

STS-78
Spacelab Module LM2 in Columbia's payload bay, serving as the Life and Microgravity Spacelab
Mission typeBioscience research
Microgravity research
OperatorNASA
COSPAR ID1996-036A Edit this at Wikidata
SATCAT no.23931
Mission duration16 days, 21 hours, 48 minutes, 30 seconds
Distance travelled11,000,000 kilometres (6,800,000 mi)
Orbits completed271
Spacecraft properties
SpacecraftSpace Shuttle Columbia
Payload mass9,649 kilograms (21,272 lb)
Crew
Crew size7
Members
  • Kevin R. Kregel
  • Richard M. Linnehan
  • Susan Helms
  • Charles E. Brady, Jr.
  • Jean-Jacques Favier
  • Robert Thirsk
  • Start of mission
    Launch dateJune 20, 1996, 14:49:00.0075 (1996-06-20UTC14:49Z) UTC
    Launch siteKennedy LC-39B
    End of mission
    Landing dateJuly 7, 1996, 12:37:30 (1996-07-07UTC12:37:31Z) UTC
    Landing siteKennedy SLF Runway 33
    Orbital parameters
    Reference systemGeocentric
    RegimeLow Earth
    Perigee altitude246 kilometres (153 mi)
    Apogee altitude261 kilometres (162 mi)
    Inclination39.0 degrees
    Period89.6 minutes

    Left to right – Seated: Henricks, Kregel; Standing, Favier Linneham, Helms, Brady, Thirsk
    ← STS-77
    STS-79 →
     

    STS-78 was the fifth dedicated Life and Microgravity Spacelab mission for the Space Shuttle program, flown partly in preparation for the International Space Station project. The mission used the Space Shuttle Columbia, which lifted off successfully from Kennedy Space Center's Launch Pad 39B on June 20, 1996. This marked the 78th flight of the Space Shuttle and 20th mission for Columbia.

    Crew

    Position Astronaut
    Commander United States Terence T. Henricks
    Fourth and last spaceflight
    Pilot United States Kevin R. Kregel
    Second spaceflight
    Mission Specialist 1 United States Richard M. Linnehan
    First spaceflight
    Mission Specialist 2 United States Susan Helms
    Third spaceflight
    Mission Specialist 3 United States Charles E. Brady, Jr.
    Only spaceflight
    Payload Specialist 1 France Jean-Jacques Favier, CNES
    Only spaceflight
    Payload Specialist 2 Canada Robert Thirsk, CSA
    First spaceflight

    Backup crew

    Position Astronaut
    Payload Specialist 1 Spain Pedro Duque, ESA
    First spaceflight
    Payload Specialist 2 Italy Luca Urbani, ASI
    First spaceflight

    Mission objectives

    Mission highlights

    Launch of STS-78

    During the 16-day, 21-hour mission, the crew of Columbia assisted in the preparations for the International Space Station by studying the effects of long-duration spaceflight on the human body in readiness for ISS Expeditions, and also carried out experiments similar to those now being carried out on the orbital station.

    Following launch, Columbia climbed to an altitude of 278 kilometers (173 mi) with an orbital inclination of 39° to the Earth's equator to allow the seven-member flight crew to maintain the same sleep rhythms they were accustomed to on Earth and to reduce vibrations and directional forces that could have affected on-board microgravity experiments.

    Once in orbit, the crew entered the 40 feet (12 m) long pressurized Spacelab module to commence over 40 science experiments to take place during the mission. Not only did these experiments make use of the module's laboratory, but also employed lockers in the middeck section of the orbiter. Thirteen of the experiments were dedicated to studying the effects of microgravity on the human body, whilst another six studied the behaviour of fluids and metals in the almost weightless environment and the production of metallic alloys and protein crystals. The crew also carried out the first ever comprehensive study of sleep patterns in microgravity, research into bone and muscle loss in space, and in-flight fixes to problem hardware on the Bubble, Drop and Particle Unit (BDPU), designed to study fluid physics.

    The mission also featured a test of a procedure that was later used during the second Hubble Space Telescope servicing mission to raise the telescope's altitude without damaging the satellite's solar arrays. During the test, Columbia's vernier Reaction Control System jets were gently pulsed to boost the Shuttle's altitude without jarring any of the mission payloads. The test was successful, and was later employed by Discovery during STS-82, and was used multiple times to boost the orbit of the ISS when docked with an orbiter.

    Mission anomaly

    Although the launch went without any issue, an issue was discovered with the SRB's following recovery. Analysis showed worrying damage to the field joints which was likely caused by hot gases. This similar damage is what caused booster seals abord Space Shuttle Challenger to break resulting in a break-up mid-flight. The issue did not compromise astronaut safety because there was a hot gas path through the motors field joint but not the capture joint. Despite there being no issue with safety, it did raise questions of a new EPA required cleaning fluid.[1]

    Due to the issue, STS-79 which was meant to dock with the Space Station Mir and return astronaut Shannon Lucid, was delayed. Options of returning Shannon on a Soyuz were considered, but never followed through as the Shuttle was considered safe and able to return Shannon.

    See also

    References

    1. ^ "'Man, I'm Here': 20 Years Since the Record-Setting Mission of STS-78 (Part 1)". AmericaSpace. June 18, 2016.

    External links

    Public Domain This article incorporates public domain material from websites or documents of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=STS-78&oldid=1136075184"

    Categories: 
    Spacecraft launched in 1996
    Space Shuttle missions
    Hidden categories: 
    Articles with short description
    Short description is different from Wikidata
    Use mdy dates from November 2022
    Webarchive template wayback links
    Wikipedia articles incorporating text from NASA
    Use American English from January 2014
    All Wikipedia articles written in American English
     



    This page was last edited on 28 January 2023, at 16:41 (UTC).

    This version of the page has been revised. Besides normal editing, the reason for revision may have been that this version contains factual inaccuracies, vandalism, or material not compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki